Abstract
The rapid penetration of artificial intelligence in education has triggered unprecedented ethical risk perception and response challenges for educators, but existing research lacks systematic exploration of deep ethical cognitive mechanisms. To address this, this study operationalizes macro level sociotechnical imaginaries into micro level psychological perceptions to construct and test a theoretical model that integrates dual-dimensional risk perception, AI Literacy, and situational factors. PLS-SEM analysis of 502 Chinese educators reveals that: both Inhibitory Ethical Risk and Promotional Professional Risk are significantly and positively associated with Defensive and Constructive Coping strategies simultaneously, challenging the traditional one dimensional risk hypothesis; AI Literacy significantly attenuated the positive association between Inhibitory Ethical Risk and Constructive Coping, supporting the hypothesis of the Literacy Sedative Effect; The strength of the positive association between Promotional Professional Risk and Constructive Coping in lower tier schools is 2.78 times stronger than that in first tier schools, providing empirical evidence for the Reverse Matthew Effect. This study proposes a dual-dimensional risk-coping framework, revealing the cognitive decoupling mechanism of AI Literacy and challenging the classical Matthew Effect, providing a new perspective for understanding individual behavior in disruptive technological change; at the same time, it also provides practical guidance for cultivating cautious and proactive adopters and developing differentiated AI Literacy training strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to his doctoral supervisors, Professor Martin Cortazzi and Professor Haomin Zhang, for their invaluable guidance and insightful comments on this manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee. The study (ref: FHSS250054) was reviewed and approved by the Faculty Ethics Committee, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Macau, on 15 Aug 2025.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Hu, Y. & Tang, H. AI literacy and school tier moderate educators’ ethical coping mechanisms through sedative and reverse Matthew effects. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52376-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52376-z
