Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluation of methods for early detection of Tropilaelaps mites in European honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 May 2026

Evaluation of methods for early detection of Tropilaelaps mites in European honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies

  • Cooper Nat Schouten  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-94991,
  • Kelly Lees2,
  • John M. K. Roberts3,
  • Emma Thompson Brewster1,
  • Flemin Gabriel4 &
  • …
  • Koi Tonny4 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 469 Accesses

  • 5 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biological techniques
  • Ecology
  • Microbiology
  • Zoology

Abstract

Tropilaelaps mites are emerging ectoparasitic parasites of European honey bees (Apis mellifera) that pose a serious threat to apiculture and pollination security globally. There is a paucity of evidence to support current detection methods used in biosecurity programs. We conducted field trials in Papua New Guinea using 27 infested A. mellifera colonies across six apiaries to evaluate six Tropilaelaps detection methods: bump test, alcohol wash, modified rapid brood uncapping, worker brood uncapping, environmental DNA (eDNA) swabs, and sticky mats with an acaricide. eDNA swabs and acaricides with sticky mats had the highest sensitivity detecting Tropilaelaps in 100% and 92% of the tested infested colonies respectively, while the alcohol wash and bump test had a sensitivity of 41% and 33% in the tested hives. Cost analysis identified rapid brood uncapping as the most cost-effective method (A$6.87 per test), while eDNA swabs and acaricide-treated sticky mats, despite their high sensitivity, were substantially more expensive (A$28.75 and A$57.08 per test, respectively). This study provides critical evidence to strengthen current honey bee biosecurity surveillance protocols and underscores the need for adoption of the most sensitive, standardized, cost-effective Tropilaelaps detection methods to improve early detection and thereby strengthen international honey bee biosecurity.

Similar content being viewed by others

Sensitivity of current Tropilaelaps mercedesae monitoring methods in Apis mellifera colonies

Article Open access 09 April 2026

Varroa mite resistance in a hybrid honey bee (Apis mellifera) population in Southern California

Article Open access 27 March 2026

Managing the parasitic honey bee mite Tropilaelaps mercedesae through combined cultural and chemical control methods

Article Open access 27 October 2024

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the support and insights of the PNG National Department of Agriculture and Livestock Highlands Regional Office and the PNG Coffee Industry Cooperation. We also wish to thank Dr Anneliese Austin for assistance in the field and Dr Kate Huges for manuscript proofs.

Funding

This work was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) under grant LS/2014/042 ‘Strengthening beekeeping industries for improved production and livelihoods in Fiji, PNG and Solomon Islands’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Military Road, East Lismore, NSW, Po 1572480, Australia

    Cooper Nat Schouten & Emma Thompson Brewster

  2. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Tocal, NSW, Australia

    Kelly Lees

  3. Australian Capital Territory, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, 2601, Australia

    John M. K. Roberts

  4. Coffee Industry Cooperation Limited, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea

    Flemin Gabriel & Koi Tonny

Authors
  1. Cooper Nat Schouten
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly Lees
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John M. K. Roberts
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emma Thompson Brewster
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Flemin Gabriel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Koi Tonny
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cooper Nat Schouten.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schouten, C.N., Lees, K., Roberts, J.M.K. et al. Evaluation of methods for early detection of Tropilaelaps mites in European honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52776-1

Download citation

  • Received: 09 March 2026

  • Accepted: 07 May 2026

  • Published: 16 May 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52776-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Tropilaelaps mercedesae
  • Honey bee biosecurity
  • Surveillance methods
  • Beekeeping
  • Apiculture
  • Environmental DNA (eDNA)
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology