Fig. 3: Iron source apportionment results (mean ± standard deviation) based on model calculations with iron isotope ratios of different size particles from urban and marine aerosols. | npj Climate and Atmospheric Science

Fig. 3: Iron source apportionment results (mean ± standard deviation) based on model calculations with iron isotope ratios of different size particles from urban and marine aerosols.

From: Stable iron isotopic composition of atmospheric aerosols: An overview

Fig. 3

Source apportionment results in a Hiroshima, b North Atlantic and Northwest Pacific. Marine aerosols are classified according to the dominant impact of air masses71,152. For the Northwest Pacific, bulk particles are referred to coarse (PM>2.5) + fine (PM2.5) fractions. Original data of Hiroshima, Northwest Pacific and North Atlantic is from Kurisu et al.148,152. and Conway et al.71, respectively. See Supplementary Tables 46 for model calculation uncertainties of the results.

Back to article page