Fig. 2: Comparison of accumulated precipitation forecasts from High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model at the McEwen precipitation gauge during the Waverly event provides insights into the forecast bias. | npj Climate and Atmospheric Science

Fig. 2: Comparison of accumulated precipitation forecasts from High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model at the McEwen precipitation gauge during the Waverly event provides insights into the forecast bias.

From: Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting

Fig. 2: Comparison of accumulated precipitation forecasts from High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model at the McEwen precipitation gauge during the Waverly event provides insights into the forecast bias.

Precipitation forecasts (in inches) on August 21, 2021, displayed in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, are shown with red, yellow, and green lines, while observations are shown with a blue line. The McEwen precipitation accumulation data utilized in this comparison is derived from TVA-collected data. The plot illustrates the discrepancy between the accumulated precipitation forecasts and the actual observations at the McEwen gauge.

Back to article page