Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj climate and atmospheric science
  3. articles
  4. article
Logarithmic CO2 warming reverses North Atlantic winter atmospheric circulation changes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 09 January 2026

Logarithmic CO2 warming reverses North Atlantic winter atmospheric circulation changes

  • Rei Chemke1 &
  • Ivan Mitevski2 

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 978 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate sciences
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

The North Atlantic climate is strongly influenced by large-scale atmospheric circulation, including the storm track and jet stream, which shape regional precipitation, temperature, and wind patterns. Climate models project an intensification of the winter circulation through the 21st century, however, it remains unclear whether abrupt or non-monotonic changes might occur under ongoing warming. Here we show that under continued CO2 emissions beyond 2100, the intensification reverses, with both the storm track and jet stream returning toward their 20th-century states. We attribute this reversal to the logarithmic relationship between CO2 and temperature, which leads to a reduced meridional temperature gradient and weakened atmospheric circulation at high CO2 concentrations. This behavior also alters regional climate patterns, reversing storm track-induced warming and wetting at higher mid-latitudes and cooling and drying at lower mid-latitudes over eastern North America and the North Atlantic. Our findings suggest that mitigation policies should account for the pace of continued emissions as well as the potential reversals in climate impacts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Persistent austral winter storm track weakening beyond doubling of CO2 concentrations

Article Open access 24 February 2025

Future climate change shaped by inter-model differences in Atlantic meridional overturning circulation response

Article Open access 16 June 2021

Future extratropical cyclones with more moisture and fewer associated atmospheric rivers

Article Open access 09 January 2026

Data availability

The data used in the manuscript are publicly available for CMIP6 (https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/), and the CESM data is available upon request.

References

  1. Zappa, G., Shaffrey, L. C., Hodges, K. I., Sansom, P. G. & Stephenson, D. B. A multimodel assessment of future projections of North Atlantic and European extratropical cyclones in the CMIP5 climate models. J. Clim. 26, 5846–5862 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lehmann, J. & Coumou, D. The influence of mid-latitude storm tracks on hot, cold, dry and wet extremes. Sci. Rep. 5, 17491 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, E. K. M., Ma, C., Zheng, C. & Yau, A. M. W. Observed and projected decrease in Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclone activity in summer and its impacts on maximum temperature. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 2200–2208 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ionita, M., Nagavciuc, V., Kumar, R. & Rakovec, O. On the curious case of the recent decade, mid-spring precipitation deficit in Central Europe. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 3, 49 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yau, A. M. W. & Chang, E. K. M. Finding storm track activity metrics that are highly correlated with weather impacts. Part I: frameworks for evaluation and accumulated track activity. J. Clim. 33, 10169–10186 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knight, J. R., Folland, C. K. & Scaife, A. A. Climate impacts of the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L17706 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, E. K. M., Guo, Y. & Xia, X. CMIP5 multimodel ensemble projection of storm track change under global warming. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D23118 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Woollings, T., Gregory, J. M., Pinto, J. G., Reyers, M. & Brayshaw, D. J. Response of the North Atlantic storm track to climate change shaped by ocean-atmosphere coupling. Nat. Geosci. 5, 313–317 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey, B. J., Shaffrey, L. C. & Woollings, T. J. Equator-to-pole temperature differences and the extra-tropical storm track responses of the CMIP5 climate models. Clim. Dyn. 43, 1171–1182 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann, J., Coumou, D., Frieler, K., Eliseev, A. V. & Levermann, A. Future changes in extratropical storm tracks and baroclinicity under climate change. Env. Res. Lett. 9, 084002 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey, B. J., Cook, P., Shaffrey, L. C. & Schiemann, R. The response of the Northern Hemisphere storm tracks and jet streams to climate change in the CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 climate models. J. Geophys. Res. 125, e32701 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chemke, R., Zanna, L., Orbe, C., Sentman, L. T. & Polvani, L. M. The future intensification of the North Atlantic winter storm track: the key role of dynamic ocean coupling. J. Clim. 35, 2407–2421 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, W., Fedorov, A. V., Xie, S. & Hu, S. Climate impacts of a weakened Atlantic Meridional overturning circulation in a warming climate. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4876 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seager, R., Naik, N. & Vecchi, G. A. Thermodynamic and dynamic mechanisms for large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle in response to global warming. J. Clim. 23, 4651–4668 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, E. K. M., Yau, A. M. W. & Zhang, R. Finding storm track activity metrics that are highly correlated with weather impacts. Part II: estimating precipitation change associated with projected storm track change over Europe. J. Clim. 35, 2423–2440 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2391 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  17. O’Gorman, P. A. & Schneider, T. Energy in midlatitude transient eddies in idealized simulations of changed climates. J. Clim. 21, 5797–5806 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitevski, I., Chemke, R., Orbe, C. & Polvani, L. M. Southern Hemisphere Winter storm tracks respond differently to low and high CO2 forcings. J. Clim. 37, 5355–5372 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Manzini, E., Karpechko, A. Y. & Kornblueh, L. Nonlinear response of the stratosphere and the North Atlantic-European climate to global warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 4255–4263 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou, W., Leung, L. R. & Lu, J. Seasonally and regionally dependent shifts of the atmospheric Westerly Jets under global warming. J. Clim. 35, 5433–5447 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Breul, P., Ceppi, P., Simpson, I. R. & Woollings, T. Seasonal and regional jet stream changes and drivers. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 6, 824–842 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, J. H. A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18701 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, Y., Ting, M., Seager, R., Huang, H. & Cane, M. A. Changes in storm tracks and energy transports in a warmer climate simulated by the GFDL CM2.1 model. Clim. Dyn. 37, 53–72 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chemke, R. & Coumou, D. Human influence on the recent weakening of storm tracks in boreal summer. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 7, 86 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Butler, A. H., Thompson, D. W. J. & Heikes, R. The steady-state atmospheric circulation response to climate change-like thermal forcings in a simple general circulation model. J. Clim. 23, 3474–3496 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yuval, J. & Kaspi, Y. Eddy activity sensitivity to changes in the vertical structure of baroclinicity. J. Atmos. Sci. 73, 1709–1726 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nie, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, G. & Yang, X. Quantifying Eddy generation and dissipation in the jet response to upper- versus lower-level thermal forcing. J. Atmos. Sci. 79, 2703–2720 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yuval, J. & Kaspi, Y. Eddy activity response to global warming-like temperature changes. J. Clim. 33, 1381–1404 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pithan, F. & Mauritsen, T. Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models. Nat. Geosci. 7, 181–184 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liang, Y. C., Polvani, L. M. & Mitevski, I. Arctic amplification, and its seasonal migration, over a wide range of abrupt CO2 forcing. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 5, 14 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mitevski, I., Orbe, C., Chemke, R., Nazarenko, L. & Polvani, L. M. Non monotonic response of the climate system to abrupt CO2 forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e90861 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hurrell, J. W. et al. The Community Earth System Model: a framework for collaborative research. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 94, 1339–1360 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. O’Gorman, P. A. Understanding the varied response of the extratropical storm tracks to climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19176–19180 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Coumou, D., Lehmann, J. & Beckmann, J. The weakening summer circulation in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. Science 348, 324–327 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chemke, R. The future poleward shift of Southern Hemisphere summer mid-latitude storm tracks stems from ocean coupling. Nat. Commun. 13, 1730 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chemke, R., Ming, Y. & Yuval, J. The intensification of winter mid-latitude storm tracks in the Southern Hemisphere. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 553–557 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chemke, R. Persistent austral winter storm track weakening beyond doubling of CO2 concentrations. Nat. Commun. 16, 1935 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Karbi, I. & Chemke, R. Emergence of winter large-scale transient atmospheric waves in the northern hemisphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2024GL113410 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Karbi, I. & Chemke, R. Seasonally asymmetric projected changes in austral atmospheric waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL117 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cox, P. M. et al. Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability. Nature 494, 341–344 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cox, P. M., Huntingford, C. & Williamson, M. S. Emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability. Nature 553, 319–322 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hall, A., Cox, P., Huntingford, C. & Klein, S. Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 269–278 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Simpson, I. R. et al. Emergent constraints on the large-scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? J. Clim. 34, 6355–6377 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chemke, R. & Yuval, J. Human induced weakening of the Northern Hemisphere tropical circulation. Nature 617, 529–532 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chemke, R. & Yuval, J. Atmospheric circulation to constrain subtropical precipitation projections. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 287–292 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.C. is grateful for the support of the Willner Family Leadership Institute for the Weizmann Institute of Science and the Zuckerman STEM Leadership Program. I.M. was supported by a Harry Hess postdoctoral fellowship from Princeton Geosciences. This work is supported by the Israeli Science Foundation Grant 407/25.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

    Rei Chemke

  2. Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Ivan Mitevski

Authors
  1. Rei Chemke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivan Mitevski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.C. analyzed the data and, together with I.M., discussed and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rei Chemke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chemke, R., Mitevski, I. Logarithmic CO2 warming reverses North Atlantic winter atmospheric circulation changes. npj Clim Atmos Sci (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01314-3

Download citation

  • Received: 23 October 2025

  • Accepted: 23 December 2025

  • Published: 09 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01314-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (npj Clim Atmos Sci)

ISSN 2397-3722 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene