Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj climate and atmospheric science
  3. articles
  4. article
Overestimation of the recent observed near-surface wind speed recovery in China
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 January 2026

Overestimation of the recent observed near-surface wind speed recovery in China

  • Yan Yan1,2,
  • Jia Wu1,2,
  • Qingchen Chao1,2 &
  • …
  • Ying Sun1,2 

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 694 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate sciences
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

In this study, the variations in near-surface wind speed (SWS) across China were analysed using 55 years of observational data from 2044 meteorological stations spanning 1970–2024. The results indicate that the SWS in China experienced a persistent decline from 1970 to 2004, then remained constant from 2005 to 2014 and shifted to recovery after 2015. The seasonal and spatial analyses confirmed that the slowdown period occurred nearly nationwide, whereas the apparent recovery displayed a strong spatial heterogeneity. On the basis of long-term station records and metadata from China, station-by-station analysis revealed that SWS records are strongly influenced by widespread relocations; 1237 stations (60.5% of the total stations) with SWS discontinuities were related to relocations, leading to an overestimation of the so-called “recovery phase” at national and regional scales. This emphasized the importance of homogenization to ensure the reliability of the SWS dataset. Afterwards, the SWS breakpoints were detected and adjusted. After homogenization, the SWS displayed slight but significantly negative trends (–‍0.06 m s⁻¹ per decade) after 2005. Representative non-relocated stations were used to validate the homogenized results, and revealed that the homogenized series accurately captured more robust signal from non-relocated stations, which confirmed the consistent declining trends across China and further implied the effect of station relocation. Notably, compared with the original records, the reduction in the homogenized SWS ranged from 3% to 11% among the subregions. This could substantially impact on the assessment of wind energy resources and requires careful attention.

Similar content being viewed by others

Growing climate change risk concerns with rising regional disparities in China

Article Open access 20 August 2025

Unsupervised detection of large-scale weather patterns in the northern hemisphere via Markov State Modelling: from blockings to teleconnections

Article Open access 16 May 2024

Seasonal predictability of the dominant surface ozone pattern over China linked to sea surface temperature

Article Open access 15 January 2024

Data availability

Due to confidentiality agreements, the SWS data used in this study are not publicly available. The researchers could obtain the raw SWS and homogenized SWS data from the first author or corresponding author upon request. Additionally, the interpolated annual mean gridded SWS data over North China, generated using a method consistent with the widely adopted CN05.1 dataset, are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17402946.

References

  1. Pryor, S. C. & Barthelmie, R. J. Climate change impacts on wind energy: a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 14, 430–437 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pryor, S. C. & Barthelmie, R. J. Assessing climate change impacts on the near-term stability of the wind energy resource over the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8167–8171 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leung, D. Y. C. & Yang, Y. Wind energy development and its environmental impact: a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 16, 1031–1039 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. IRENA. Renewable energy statistics 2025 (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2025).

  5. Jacobson, M. Z. & Kaufman, Y. Wind reduction by aerosol particles. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L24814 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, X., McElroy, M. B. & Kiviluoma, J. Global potential for wind-generated electricity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10933–10938 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tobin, I. et al. Land surface wind speed (in “State of the Climate in 2013”). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, S28–S29 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, C. G. et al. Impacts of wind stilling on solar radiation variability in China. Sci. Rep. 5, 15135. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15135 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, N. et al. Numerical simulations on influence of urban land cover expansion and anthropogenic heat release on urban meteorological environment in Pearl River Delta. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 126, 469–479 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, X. et al. PM2.5 pollution in China and how it has been exacerbated by terrain and meteorological conditions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 105–119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, Y. et al. Decreasing atmospheric visibility associated with weakening winds from 1980 to 2017 over China. Atmos. Environ. 222, 117314 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paulot, F., Naik, V. & Horowitz, L. Reduction in near-surface wind speeds with increasing CO2 may worsen winter air quality in the Indo-Gangetic plain. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099039. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099039 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hobbins, M. T. Regional evapotranspiration and pan evaporation: complementary interactions and long-term trends across the conterminous United States. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins (2004).

  14. Rayner, D. P. Wind run changes: the dominant factor affecting pan evaporation trends in Australia. J. Clim. 20, 3379–3394 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Song, Z. W. et al. Distribution and trends in reference evapotranspiration in the North China Plain. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 136, 240–247 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. McVicar, T. R. et al. Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: implications for evaporation. J. Hydrol. 416, 182–205 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, K. & Dickinson, R. E. A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Rev. Geophys. 50, RG2005 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, X. et al. Effect of surface wind speed decline on modeled hydrological conditions in China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 2803–2813 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, Y. P. et al. Effects of land use and cover change on surface wind speed in China. J. Arid Land 11, 345–356 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng, D. S. et al. Climate change impacts on the extreme power shortage events of wind-solar supply systems worldwide during 1980–2022. Nat. Commun. 15, 5225 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng, D. S. et al. Strategies for climate-resilient global wind and solar power systems. Nature 643, 1263–1270 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roderick, M. L. et al. On the attribution of changing pan evaporation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L17403 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pryor, S. C. et al. Wind speed trends over the contiguous US. J. Geophys. Res. D. 114, D14105 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dunn, R. J. H. et al. HadISD: A quality-controlled global synoptic report database for selected variables at long-term stations from 1973–2011. Climate 8, 1649–1679 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, D., von Storch, H. & Geyer, B. High-resolution wind hindcast over the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea in East Asia: evaluation and wind climatology analysis. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 111–129 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng, Z. et al. A reversal in global terrestrial stilling and its implications for wind energy production. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 979–985 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ding, Y. H., Li, X. & Li, Q. P. Advances of surface wind speed changes over China under global warming. J. Appl. Meteorol. Sci. 31, 1–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dumitrescu, A. et al. Recent climatic changes in Romania from observational data (1961–2013). Theor. Appl. Climatol. 122, 111–119 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vautard, R. et al. Northern Hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nat. Geosci. 3, 756–761 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, J. et al. Changes in terrestrial near-surface wind speed and their possible causes: an overview. Clim. Dyn. 51, 2039–2078 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, G. et al. Rapid urbanization induced daily maximum wind speed decline in metropolitan areas: a case study in the Yangtze River Delta (China). Urban Clim. 43, 101147 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Berrisford, P., Tobin, I., Dunn, R. J. H., Vautard, R. & McVicar, T. R. Land surface wind speed (in “State of the Climate in 2014. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, S33–S34 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dunn, R. J. H. et al. Surface winds (in “State of the climate in 2015”). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, S38–S40 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Azorin-Molina, C., Dunn, R. J. H., Mears, C. A., Berrisford, P. & McVicar, T. R. Surface winds [in “State of the climate in 2016”]. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, S37–S39 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wohland, J., Folini, D. & Pickering, B. Wind speed stilling and its recovery due to internal climate variability. Earth Syst. Dyn. 12, 1239–1251 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou, L. H. et al. A continuous decline of global seasonal wind speed range over land since 1980. J. Clim. 9443–9461; (2021).

  37. Wu, J. & Shi, Y. Changes in surface wind speed and its different grades over China during 1961–2020 based on a high-resolution dataset. Int. J. Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7453 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miao, H. Z. Y. et al. The reversal of surface wind speed trend in Northeast China: impact from aerosol emissions. Clim. Dyn. 63, 43 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guo, H., Xu, M. & Hu, Q. Changes in near-surface wind speed in China: 1969–2005. Int. J. Climatol. 31, 349–358 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, J. C. & Paik, K. Recent recovery of surface wind speed after decadal decrease: a focus on South Korea. Clim. Dyn. 45, 1699–1712 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, X. et al. The decreasing wind speed in southwestern China during 1969–2009, and possible causes. Quat. Int. 263, 71–84 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zha, J. L., Wu, J., Zhao, D. M. & Tang, J. P. A possible recovery of the near-surface wind speed in Eastern China during winter after 2000 and the potential causes. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 136, 119–134 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, Z. T. & Wang, K. Stilling and recovery of the surface wind speed based on observation, reanalysis, and geostrophic wind theory over China from 1960 to 2017. J. Clim. 33, 3989–4008 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wu, J., Shi, Y. & Xu, Y. Evaluation and projection of surface wind speed over China based on CMIP6 GCMs. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 125, e2020JD033611 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Enloe, J., O’Brien, J. J. & Smith, S. ENSO impacts on peak wind gusts in the United States. J. Clim. 17, 1728–1737 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xu, M. et al. Steady decline of East Asian monsoon winds, 1969–2000: evidence from direct ground measurements of wind speed. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, D24111 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fu, G. B. et al. Temporal variation of wind speed in China for 1961–2007. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 104, 313–324 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Clifton, A. & Lundquist, J. K. Data clustering reveals climate impacts on local wind phenomena. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 51, 1547–1557 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Earl, N. et al. 1980–2010 variability in U.K. surface wind climate. J. Clim. 26, 1172–1191 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chen, L., Li, D. & Pryor, S. C. Wind speed trends over China: quantifying the magnitude and assessing causality. Int. J. Climatol. 33, 2579–2590 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wever, N. Quantifying trends in surface roughness and the effect on surface wind speed observations. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D11 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zha, J. L., Shen, C. & Zhao, D. M. Slowdown and reversal of terrestrial near-surface wind speed and its future changes over eastern China. Environ. Res. 16, 034028 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li, D. et al. Statistical bias correction for simulated wind speeds over CORDEX-East Asia. Earth Space Sci. 6, 200–211 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stull, R. B. An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8 (Springer, 1988).

  55. Ramanathan, V. C. et al. Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5326–5333 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bichet, A., Wild, M., Folini, D. & Schär, C. Causes for decadal variations of speed over land: sensitivity studies with a global climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L11701 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Li, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z. & Fang, G. Recent recovery of surface wind speed in northwest China. Int. J. Climatol. 38, 4445–4458 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wan, H., Wang, X. L. & Swail, V. R. Homogenization and trend analysis of Canadian near-surface wind speeds. J. Clim. 23, 1209–1225 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Degaetano, A. T. Identification and implications of biases in U.S. surface wind observation, archival and summarization methods. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 60, 151–162 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Feng, S., Hu, Q. & Qian, W. H. Quality control of daily meteorological data in China, 1951–2000: a new dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 24, 853–870 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Masters, F. J. et al. Toward objective, standardized intensity estimates from surface wind speed observations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 1665–1682 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Thomas, B. R. & Swail, V. R. Buoy wind inhomogeneities related to averaging method and anemometer type: application to long time series. Int. J. Climatol. 31, 1040–1055 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hong, H. P. et al. Basis for recommending an update of wind velocity pressures in Canadian design codes. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 41, 206–221 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Azorin-Molina, C. et al. Evaluating anemometer drift: A statistical approach to correct biases in wind speed measurement. Atmos. Res. 203, 175–188 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Dunn, R. J. H. et al. Reduction in reversal of global stilling arising from correction to encoding of calm periods. Environ. Res. Commun. 4, 061003 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Patzert, W., LaDochy, S. D., Ramirez, P. & Willis, J. Los Angeles Weather Station’s relocation impacts climatic and weather records. Calif. Geogr. 55, 42–52 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Liu, Y. et al. Impacts of anemometer changes, site relocations and processing methods on wind speed trends in China. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 17, 1123–1131 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  68. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896 (2021).

  69. Ramon, J., Lledó, L., Torralba, V., Soret, A. & Doblas-Reyes, F. J. What global reanalysis best represents near-surface winds? Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 145, 3236–3251 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Molina, M. O., Gutiérrez, C. & Sánchez, E. Comparison of ERA5 surface wind speed climatologies over Europe with observations from the HadISD dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 41, 4864–4878 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gandoin, R. & Garza, J. Underestimation of strong wind speeds offshore in ERA5: evidence, discussion and correction. Wind Energy Sci. 9, 1727–1745 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Liu, W. L. et al. Rapid acceleration of Arctic near-surface wind speed in a warming climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL109385 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Shen, C. et al. Increases of offshore wind potential in a warming world. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL109494 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Fan, W. et al. Evaluation of global reanalysis land surface wind speed trends to support wind energy development using in situ observations. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 60, 33–50 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Shen, C. et al. Does CRA-40 outperform other reanalysis products in evaluating near-surface wind speed changes over China?. Atmos. Res. 266, 105948 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wang, X. L. et al. Trends and variability of storminess in the Northeast Atlantic region, 1874–2007. Clim. Dyn. 33, 1179–1195 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Shen, C. et al. March near-surface wind speed hiatus over China since 2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104230 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Zhang, Z. T. & Wang, K. Homogenization of observed surface wind speed based on geostrophic wind theory over China from 1970 to 2017. J. Clim. 36, 3667–3679 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wang, X. L. & Feng, Y. RHtestsV4 user manual. Climate Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, 29 https://etccdi.pacificclimate.org/RHtest/RHtestsV4_UserManual_10Dec2014.pdf (2013).

  80. Lee, J. C. Y. & Fields, M. J. An overview of wind-energy-production prediction bias, losses and uncertainties. Wind Energy Sci. 6, 311–365; (2021).

  81. Shi, T., Yang, Y. J., Sun, D. B., Huang, Y. & Shi, C. Influence of changes in meteorological observational environment on urbanization bias in surface air temperature: a review. Front. Clim. 3, 781999 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Zhou, C. L. et al. A century-long homogenized dataset of near-surface wind speed observations since 1925 rescued in Sweden. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 14, 2167–2177 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Cao, L. J., and Yan Z. W. Progress in research on homogenization of climate data. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 3, 59-67 (2012).

  84. Andres-Martin, M. et al. Uncertainty in surface wind speed projections over the Iberian Peninsula: CMIP6 GCMs versus a WRF-RCM. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1529, 101–108 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Deng, H., Hua, W. & Fan, G. Z. Evaluation and projection of near-surface wind speed over China based on CMIP6 models. Atmospheric 12, 1062 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zha, J. L., Zhao, D. M. & Fan, W. X. Future projections of the near-surface wind speed over eastern China based on CMIP5 datasets. Clim. Dyn. 54, 2361–2385 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Shen, C. et al. Centennial-scale variability of terrestrial near-surface wind speed over China from reanalysis. J. Clim. 34, 5829–5846 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Li, Z.-B., Sun, M., Shen, C. & Chen, D. L. ENSO-driven seasonal variability in near-surface wind speed and wind power potential across China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL115537 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Shen, C., Li, Z. B., Liu, F., Chen, H. W. & Chen, D. L. A robust reduction in near-surface wind speed after volcanic eruptions: Implications for wind energy generation. Innovation 6, 100734 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Shen, C. et al. Unravelling the future role of internal variability in South Asian near-surface wind speed. Earth Syst. Dyn. 16, 1959–1979 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Miao, H., Xu, H., Huang, G. & Yang, K. Evaluation and future projections of wind energy resources over the Northern Hemisphere in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Renew. Energy 211, 809–821 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  92. WMO. WMO guidelines on the calculation of climate normals, WMO-No. 1203. https://library.wmo.int/viewer/55797?medianame=1203_en_#page=1&viewer=picture&o=bookmark&n=0&q (2017).

  93. Cao, L. J., Ju, X. H. & Liu, X. N. Penalized maximal F test for the homogeneity study of the annual mean wind speed over China. Meteorol. Mon. 36, 52–56 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Azorin-Molina, C. et al. An approach to homogenize daily peak wind gusts: An application to the Australian series. Int. J. Climatol. 39, 2260–2277 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Wang, X. L., Chen, H. F., Wu, Y. H., Feng, Y. & Pu, Q. New techniques for the detection and adjustment of shifts in daily precipitation data series. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 49, 2416–2436 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sen, P. K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63, 1379–1389 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Theil, H. A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. Henri Theil's. Contributions Econ. Econ. (Adv. Stud. Theor). Appl. Econ. 23, 20 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Mondal, A., Kundu, S. & Mukhopadhyay, A. Rainfall trend analysis by Mann-Kendall test: a case study of north-eastern part of Cuttack district, Orissa. Int. J. Geol. Earth Environ. Sci. 2, 70–78 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  99. You, Q. et al. Observed surface wind speed in the Tibetan Plateau since 1980 and its physical causes. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 1873–1882 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the meteorological measurements provided by China Meteorological Administration (http://data.cma.cn/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China

    Yan Yan, Jia Wu, Qingchen Chao & Ying Sun

  2. Key Laboratory for Climate Studies, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China

    Yan Yan, Jia Wu, Qingchen Chao & Ying Sun

Authors
  1. Yan Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qingchen Chao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ying Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.Y. and W.J. conceived and designed the study, developed the methodology, conducted the investigation, performed formal analysis, and drafted the original manuscript. C.Q. contributed to the study framework design and acquired funding. S.Y. participated in result discussions and manuscript editing. All authors were involved in writing the paper, as well as in discussing and interpreting the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Y., Wu, J., Chao, Q. et al. Overestimation of the recent observed near-surface wind speed recovery in China. npj Clim Atmos Sci (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01322-x

Download citation

  • Received: 21 October 2025

  • Accepted: 05 January 2026

  • Published: 16 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01322-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (npj Clim Atmos Sci)

ISSN 2397-3722 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene