Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj climate and atmospheric science
  3. articles
  4. article
Projected and historical amplification of moisture fluxes towards Antarctica by synoptic eddies
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 April 2026

Projected and historical amplification of moisture fluxes towards Antarctica by synoptic eddies

  • Patrick Martineau1,
  • Hua Lu2 &
  • Thomas J. Bracegirdle2 

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate sciences
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

Synoptic weather systems play a crucial role in transporting moisture to Antarctica. Climate models project significant changes in these systems, including a wintertime intensification and a summertime poleward shift, with implications for Antarctic ice mass balance. Our analysis of CMIP6 model output shows synoptic moisture fluxes across the Antarctic Circle increasing by 2–6% per decade under high-emission scenarios, accounting for 24% of winter and 93% of summer total moisture transport trends. This increase is mainly associated with enhanced eddy moisture anomalies rather than stronger eddy wind anomalies that are often used to gauge storm track activity. Eddy-driven moisture variability also accounts for a substantial fraction of inter-model uncertainty in future projections. Furthermore, using a large-ensemble approach, we show that differences between reanalysis and multi-model mean externally forced trends could possibly be due to natural climatic variability, while potential model biases cannot be excluded.

Similar content being viewed by others

Antarctic extreme seasons under 20th and 21st century climate change

Article Open access 07 November 2024

A comparison of the meridional meandering of extratropical precipitation during boreal winter: eddy momentum flux versus Eulerian storm tracks

Article Open access 13 March 2025

Seasonally distinct contributions of greenhouse gases and anthropogenic aerosols to historical changes in Arctic moisture budget

Article Open access 15 November 2023

Data availability

MERRA-2 was obtained from the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets?project=MERRA-2). CFSR, CFSv2, and JRA-55 data were obtained from the research data archive (RDA; https://rda.ucar.edu/). ERA5 was obtained from the climate data store (https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6). CMIP6 model data were obtained from the Earth System Grid Federation (e.g. https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/). Code can be provided upon request.

References

  1. Wang, H. et al. Influence of sea-ice anomalies on Antarctic precipitation using source attribution in the Community Earth System Model. Cryosphere 14, 429–444 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanna, E. et al. Mass balance of the ice sheets and glaciers – Progress since AR5 and challenges. Earth-Sci. Rev. 201, 102976 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rendfrey, T. S., Pettersen, C., Bassis, J. N. & Mateling, M. E. CloudSat observations show enhanced moisture transport events increase snowfall rate and frequency over Antarctic ice sheet basins. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 129, e2023JD040556 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budd, W. F., Reid, P. A. & Minty, L. J. Antarctic moisture flux and net accumulation from global atmospheric analyses. Ann. Glaciol. 21, 149–156 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delaygue, G., Masson, V. & Jouzel, J. Climatic stability of the geographic origin of Antarctic precipitation simulated by an atmospheric general circulation model. Ann. Glaciol. 29, 45–48 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Slonaker, R. L. & Van Woert, M. L. Atmospheric moisture transport across the Southern Ocean via satellite observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 104, 9229–9249 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Connolley, W. M. & King, J. C. Atmospheric water-vapour transport to Antarctica inferred from radiosonde data. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 119, 325–342 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsukernik, M. & Lynch, A. H. Atmospheric Meridional Moisture Flux over the Southern Ocean: A Story of the Amundsen Sea. J. Clim. 26, 8055–8064 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trenberth, K. E. & Stepaniak, D. P. Covariability of components of poleward atmospheric energy transports on seasonal and interannual timescales. J. Clim. 16, 3691–3705 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Q., Li, T. & Zhou, W. Impacts of Multi-Timescale Circulations on Meridional Moisture Transport. J. Clim. 34, 1–64 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tietäväinen, H. & Vihma, T. Atmospheric moisture budget over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean based on the ERA-40 reanalysis. Int. J. Climatol. 28, 1977–1995 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turner, J., Marshall, G. J. & Lachlan-Cope, T. A. Analysis of synoptic-scale low pressure systems within the Antarctic Peninsula sector of the circumpolar trough. Int. J. Climatol. 18, 253–280 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simmonds, I., Keay, K. & Lim, E. P. Synoptic activity in the seas around Antarctica. Month. Weather Rev. 131, 272–288 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uotila, P., Pezza, A. B., Cassano, J. J., Keay, K. & Lynch, A. H. A comparison of low pressure system statistics derived from a high-resolution NWP output and three reanalysis products over the Southern Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114, 1–19 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Irving, D., Simmonds, I. & Keay, K. Mesoscale cyclone activity over the ice-free Southern Ocean: 1999-2008. J. Clim. 23, 5404–5420 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sinclair, V. A. & Dacre, H. F. Which extratropical cyclones contribute most to the transport of moisture in the Southern Hemisphere? J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 124, 2525–2545 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Naakka, T., Nygård, T. & Vihma, T. Air moisture climatology and related physical processes in the antarctic on the basis of ERA5 reanalysis. J. Clim. 34, 4463–4480 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papritz, L. et al. The role of extratropical cyclones and fronts for Southern Ocean freshwater fluxes. J. Clim. 27, 6205–6224 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maclennan, M. L., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Shields, C. & Wille, J. D. Contribution of Atmospheric Rivers to Antarctic Precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, 1–8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gorodetskaya, I. V. et al. The role of atmospheric rivers in anomalous snow accumulation in East Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6199–6206 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gorodetskaya, I. V., Silva, T., Schmithüsen, H. & Hirasawa, N. Atmospheric River Signatures in Radiosonde Profiles and Reanalyses at the Dronning Maud Land Coast, East Antarctica. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 37, 455–476 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maclennan, M. L. et al. Climatology and surface impacts of atmospheric rivers on West Antarctica. Cryosphere 17, 865–881 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guo, Y., Shinoda, T., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E. & Chang, E. K. M. Statistical Relationship between Atmospheric Rivers and Extratropical Cyclones and Anticyclones. J. Clim. 33, 7817–7834 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, H. et al. Extreme warm events in the South Orkney Islands, Southern Ocean: Compounding influence of atmospheric rivers and föhn conditions. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 149, 3645–3668 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Franzke, C. L. E. & Harnik, N. Long-term trends of the atmospheric circulation and moist static energy budget in the JRA-55 reanalysis. J. Clim. 36, 2959–2984 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chemke, R., Ming, Y. & Yuval, J. The intensification of winter mid-latitude storm tracks in the Southern Hemisphere. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 553–557 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chemke, R. & Polvani, L. M. Linking midlatitudes eddy heat flux trends and polar amplification. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 3, 1–8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cox, T., Donohoe, A., Armour, K. C., Frierson, D. M. W. & Roe, G. H. Trends in atmospheric heat transport since 1980. J. Clim. 37, 1539–1550 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dufour, A., Charrondière, C. & Zolina, O. Moisture transport in observations and reanalyses as a proxy for snow accumulation in East Antarctica. Cryosphere 13, 413–425 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chemke, R. The future poleward shift of Southern Hemisphere summer mid-latitude storm tracks stems from ocean coupling. Nat. Commun. 13, 1730 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chang, E. K. M., Guo, Y. & Xia, X. CMIP5 multimodel ensemble projection of storm track change under global warming. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 117, 1–19 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Uotila, P., Lynch, A. H., Cassano, J. J. & Cullather, R. I. Changes in Antarctic net precipitation in the 21st century based on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) model scenarios. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 112, 1–19 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krinner, G., Largeron, C., Ménégoz, M., Agosta, C. & Brutel-Vuilmet, C. Oceanic forcing of Antarctic climate change: a study using a stretched-grid atmospheric general circulation model. J. Clim. 27, 5786–5800 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grieger, J., Leckebusch, G. C. & Ulbrich, U. Net precipitation of Antarctica: thermodynamical and dynamical parts of the climate change signal. J. Clim. 29, 907–924 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dalaiden, Q., Goosse, H., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Cavitte, M. G. P. & Henderson, N. Future Antarctic snow accumulation trend is dominated by atmospheric synoptic-scale events. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 62 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organisation. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 8, 10539–10583 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. van Loon, H. & Jenne, R. L. The zonal harmonic standing waves in the southern hemisphere. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 992–1003 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goyal, R., Jucker, M., Gupta, A. S. & England, M. H. A New Zonal Wave-3 Index for the Southern Hemisphere. J. Clim. 35, 5137–5149 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Goyal, R., Jucker, M., Sen Gupta, A., Hendon, H. H. & England, M. H. Zonal wave 3 pattern in the Southern Hemisphere generated by tropical convection. Nat. Geosci. 14, 732–738 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jain, S. et al. Importance of internal variability for climate model assessment. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 6, 68 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Xin, M. et al. West-warming East-cooling trend over Antarctica reversed since early 21st century driven by large-scale circulation variation. Environmental Research Letters 18, (2023).

  42. Turner, J. et al. Extreme temperatures in the Antarctic. J. Clim. 34, 2653–2668 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bromwich, D. H., Nicolas, J. P. & Monaghan, A. J. An Assessment of Precipitation Changes over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean since 1989 in Contemporary Global Reanalyses*. J. Clim. 24, 4189–4209 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Orsi, A. H., Johnson, G. C. & Bullister, J. L. Circulation, mixing, and production of Antarctic Bottom Water. Prog. Oceanogr. 43, 55–109 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kobayashi, S. et al. The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II 93, 5–48 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gelaro, R. et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Saha, S. et al. The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 1015–1058 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saha, S. et al. The NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2. J. Clim. 27, 2185–2208 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wallace, J. M. & Gutzler, D. S. Teleconnections in the Geopotential Height Field during the Northern Hemisphere Winter. Month. Weather Rev. 109, 784–812 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wilks Dan, S. “The Stippling Shows Statistically Significant Grid Points”: How Research Results are Routinely Overstated and Overinterpreted, and What to Do about It. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 2263–2273 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Patrick Martineau was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research JP19H05702 and JP25H02094. Hua Lu and Thomas Bracegirdle are supported by the NERC through SURface FluxEs In AnTarctica project (NE/X009319/1). We are grateful to the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for making ERA5 data available. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme, which, through its Working Group on Coupled Modelling, coordinated and promoted CMIP6. We thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) for archiving the data and providing access, and the multiple funding agencies who support CMIP6 and ESGF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan

    Patrick Martineau

  2. British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK

    Hua Lu & Thomas J. Bracegirdle

Authors
  1. Patrick Martineau
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hua Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas J. Bracegirdle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.M. led and coordinated the various components of the study throughout. All authors (P.M., H.L., and T.B.) discussed the results and aided in their interpretation. P.M. took the lead in writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Martineau.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martineau, P., Lu, H. & Bracegirdle, T.J. Projected and historical amplification of moisture fluxes towards Antarctica by synoptic eddies. npj Clim Atmos Sci (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01376-x

Download citation

  • Received: 15 July 2025

  • Accepted: 03 March 2026

  • Published: 02 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01376-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (npj Clim Atmos Sci)

ISSN 2397-3722 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene