Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj climate and atmospheric science
  3. articles
  4. article
Unprecedented 2024 East Antarctic winter heatwave driven by polar vortex weakening and amplified by anthropogenic warming
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2026

Unprecedented 2024 East Antarctic winter heatwave driven by polar vortex weakening and amplified by anthropogenic warming

  • Haosu Tang1,
  • Sihan Li1,
  • Julie M. Jones1,
  • Sergi González-Herrero2,
  • Andrew Orr3,
  • Friederike E. L. Otto4,
  • James A. Screen5,
  • Kyle R. Clem6,
  • Deniz Bozkurt7,
  • Jennifer L. Catto5,
  • Charlie C. Suitters5,
  • Michelle L. Maclennan3 &
  • …
  • Yiming Sun8 

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate sciences
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

During July–August 2024, East Antarctica experienced the most intense winter heatwave in the 46-year satellite era, with regional mean surface air temperatures across Dronning Maud Land exceeding the climatological mean by more than 9°C for 17 consecutive days. To explore the physical drivers and quantify the anthropogenic contribution to this unprecedented event, we propose a multi-model, multi-method attribution framework integrating regional climate model-based storyline attribution, circulation analogues, and large-ensemble probabilistic attribution. The results show that a pronounced weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex initiated a quasi-barotropic high-pressure anomaly, which enhanced meridional heat and moisture transport and accounted for approximately 50% of the observed surface warming. Across different models and attribution methods, synthesis of the attribution results indicates that anthropogenic warming intensified the event by approximately 0.7°C and more than doubled the likelihood of such exceptional winter heatwaves in the current climate. Probabilistic attribution further indicates that, compared to a natural climate without human influence, the likelihood of such events increases from 2–3 times today to ~6 times under moderate emissions and up to 26 times under high emissions by 2100. These findings reveal how human-induced warming is transforming even the coldest regions, with implications for ice shelf stability and predictability of future Antarctic extremes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Warming-induced hydrothermal anomaly over the Earth’s three Poles amplifies concurrent extremes in 2022

Article Open access 06 January 2024

Storylines reveal contrasting thermodynamic effects of climate change on 2020/21 East Asian cold extremes

Article Open access 06 May 2025

Climate warming amplified the 2020 record-breaking heatwave in the Antarctic Peninsula

Article Open access 27 May 2022

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are openly accessible. ERA5 datasets could be retrieved at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels-monthly-means?tab=overview. JRA3Q datasets could be obtained from https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/d640000/dataaccess/#. The CMIP6 model outputs can be accessed at the ESGF portal (https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6/). The outputs of HadGEM3-A-N216 large ensemble simulations are available from the Met Office at https://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/eucleia/data/EUCLEIA/output/MOHC/HadGEM3-A-N216. The WRF model version used for the PGW experiments is available from https://gitlabext.wsl.ch/atmospheric-models/CRYOWRF and the package used to generate the PGW deltas is available at https://github.com/sergigonzalezh/PGWERA5WRF. The daily READER datasets can be obtained from https://legacy.bas.ac.uk/met/READER/.

Code availability

All the codes for analyses and diagnostics are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Turner, J. et al. Antarctic climate change and the environment. (2009).

  2. Rignot, E. et al. Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979-2017. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1095–1103 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stokes, C. R. et al. Response of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet to past and future climate change. Nature 608, 275 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, T. et al. Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet in the early 21st century. Remote Sens. 15, 1677 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kingslake, J., Ely, J. C., Das, I. & Bell, R. E. Widespread movement of meltwater onto and across Antarctic ice shelves. Nature 544, 349–352 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stokes, C. R., Sanderson, J. E., Miles, B. W., Jamieson, S. S. & Leeson, A. A. Widespread distribution of supraglacial lakes around the margin of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet. Sci. Rep. 9, 13823 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tuckett, P. A. et al. Continent-wide mapping shows increasing sensitivity of East Antarctica to meltwater ponding. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 775–783 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mahagaonkar, A., Moholdt, G., Glaude, Q. & Schuler, T. V. Katabatic and foehn winds control the distribution of supraglacial lakes in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 666, 119482 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Cox, T., Espinosa, Z. I. & Donohoe, A. The Largest Ever Recorded Heatwave-Characteristics and Attribution of the Antarctic Heatwave of March 2022. Geophys. Res. Lett.s 50, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl104910 (2023).

  10. Wille, J. D. et al. The Extraordinary March 2022 East Antarctica “Heat” Wave. Part I: Observations and Meteorological Drivers. J. Clim. 37, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-23-0175.1 (2024).

  11. NASA. A Series of Rare Disturbances in the Stratosphere, <https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/153258/a-series-of-rare-disturbances-in-the-stratosphere> (2024).

  12. Zi, Y. et al. The sudden stratospheric warming events in the Antarctic in 2024. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL115257 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raphael, M. et al. Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc. 106, S357–S400 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song, J., Zhang, J., Du, S., Xu, M. & Zhao, S. Impact of early winter Antarctic sea ice reduction on Antarctic stratospheric polar vortex. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 130, e2024JD041831 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. NSIDC. 2024 Antarctic sea ice maximum extent finishes at second lowest, <https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today/analyses/2024-antarctic-sea-ice-maximum-extent-finishes-second-lowest> (2024).

  16. González-Herrero, S., Barriopedro, D., Trigo, R. M., López-Bustins, J. A. & Oliva, M. Climate warming amplified the 2020 record-breaking heatwave in the Antarctic Peninsula. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00450-5 (2022).

  17. Zou, X. et al. Strong Warming Over the Antarctic Peninsula During Combined Atmospheric River and Foehn Events: Contribution of Shortwave Radiation and Turbulence. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd038138 (2023).

  18. Gilbert, E., Orr, A., Renfrew, I. A., King, J. C. & Lachlan-Cope, T. A 20-Year Study of Melt Processes Over Larsen C Ice Shelf Using a High-Resolution Regional Atmospheric Model: 2. Drivers of Surface Melting. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres. 127, e2021JD036012 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Orr, A. et al. Characteristics of surface “melt potential” over Antarctic ice shelves based on regional atmospheric model simulations of summer air temperature extremes from 1979/80 to 2018/19. J. Clim. 36, 3357–3383 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gorodetskaya, I. V. et al. Record-high Antarctic Peninsula temperatures and surface melt in February 2022: a compound event with an intense atmospheric river. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00529-6 (2023).

  21. Wille, J. D. et al. Atmospheric rivers in Antarctica. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 6, 178–192 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bozkurt, D., Marín, J. C. & Barrett, B. S. Temperature and moisture transport during atmospheric blocking patterns around the Antarctic Peninsula. Weather Clim. Extremes 38, 100506 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Evangelista, H. et al. The June 2022 extreme warm event in central West Antarctica. Antarct. Sci. 35, 319–327 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, H. et al. Extreme warm events in the South Orkney Islands, Southern Ocean: Compounding influence of atmospheric rivers and föhn conditions. Q. J. R. Meteorological Soc. 149, 3645–3668 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pohl, B. et al. Relationship between weather regimes and atmospheric rivers in East Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 126, e2021JD035294 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maclennan, M. L. et al. Climatology and surface impacts of atmospheric rivers on West Antarctica. Cryosphere 17, 865–881 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nicolas, J. P. et al. January 2016 extensive summer melt in West Antarctica favoured by strong El Niño. Nat. Commun. 8, 15799 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Scott, R. C., Nicolas, J. P., Bromwich, D. H., Norris, J. R. & Lubin, D. Meteorological drivers and large-scale climate forcing of West Antarctic surface melt. J. Clim. 32, 665–684 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Terpstra, A., Gorodetskaya, I. V. & Sodemann, H. Linking sub-tropical evaporation and extreme precipitation over East Antarctica: An atmospheric river case study. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 126, e2020JD033617 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, X. C. et al. Tropical teleconnection impacts on Antarctic climate changes. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 680–698 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Man, K. et al. Century-long West Antarctic snow accumulation changes induced by tropical teleconnections. Sci. Adv. 11, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adr2821 (2025).

  32. Turner, J. et al. Antarctic temperature variability and change from station data. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 2986–3007 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Clem, K. R. et al. Record warming at the South Pole during the past three decades. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 762–770 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Clem, K. R., Bozkurt, D., Kennett, D., King, J. C. & Turner, J. Central tropical Pacific convection drives extreme high temperatures and surface melt on the Larsen C Ice Shelf, Antarctic Peninsula. Nat. Commun. 13, 3906 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fogt, R. L. & Bromwich, D. H. Decadal variability of the ENSO teleconnection to the high-latitude South Pacific governed by coupling with the southern annular mode. J. Clim. 19, 979–997 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jones, J. M. et al. Assessing recent trends in high-latitude Southern Hemisphere surface climate. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 917–926 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Raphael, M. N. et al. THE AMUNDSEN SEA LOW Variability, Change, and Impact on Antarctic Climate. Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc. 97, 111–121 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rahaman, W., Chatterjee, S., Ejaz, T. & Thamban, M. Increased influence of ENSO on Antarctic temperature since the Industrial Era. Sci. Rep. 9, 6006 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution working group I sixth Assess. Rep. intergovernmental panel Clim. change 2, 2391 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Siegert, M. J. et al. Antarctic extreme events. Front. Environ. Sci. 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1229283 (2023).

  41. Gillett, N. P. et al. Attribution of polar warming to human influence. Nat. Geosci. 1, 750–754 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dalaiden, Q., Schurer, A. P., Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., Goosse, H. & Hegerl, G. C. West Antarctic surface climate changes since the mid-20th century driven by anthropogenic forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099543 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, S. et al. Recent warming trends in Antarctica revealed by multiple reanalysis. Adv. Clim. Change Res. (2025).

  44. Sciences, N. A. o. et al. Attribution of extreme weather events in the context of climate change. (National Academies Press, 2016).

  45. Shepherd, T. G. et al. Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change. Climatic Change 151, 555–571 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T. & Shepherd, T. G. Attribution of climate extreme events. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 725–730 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, J. et al. Storyline attribution of human influence on a record-breaking spatially compounding flood-heat event. Sci. Adv.s 9, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2714 (2023).

  48. Williams, R. S. et al. Future Antarctic climate: Storylines of midlatitude jet strengthening and shift emergent from CMIP6. J. Clim. 37, 2157–2178 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhai, Z., Wang, Y., Wu, Q. & Hou, S. Record-breaking warm late-winter over Antarctica in 2024: The role of western Pacific warm pool and Pacific decadal oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2024GL114528 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gehring, J. et al. Orographic flow influence on precipitation during an atmospheric river event at Davis, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 127, e2021JD035210 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Goosse, H. et al. Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1919 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kittel, C. et al. Clouds drive differences in future surface melt over the Antarctic ice shelves. Cryosphere 2021, 1–20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Takaya, K. & Nakamura, H. A formulation of a phase-independent wave-activity flux for stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 58, 608–627 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Li, X., Holland, D. M., Gerber, E. P. & Yoo, C. Rossby waves mediate impacts of tropical oceans on West Antarctic atmospheric circulation in austral winter. J. Clim. 28, 8151–8164 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Clem, K. R., Renwick, J. A. & McGregor, J. Autumn cooling of western East Antarctica linked to the tropical Pacific. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres. 123, 89–107 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. González-Herrero, S. et al. Impact attribution of the March 2022 Antarctic heatwave reveals amplification by cloud feedbacks and increased future meltwater. Commun. Earth Environ. (accepted).

  57. Josey, S. A. et al. Record-low Antarctic sea ice in 2023 increased ocean heat loss and storms. Nature 636, 635–639 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ezber, Y., Bozkurt, D. & Ilicak, M. Modeling the Impacts of Antarctic Sea Ice Decline: Responses of Atmospheric Dynamics. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 130, e2024JD041558 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lim, E. P. et al. Characteristics of Antarctic stratospheric variability during winter: A case study of the 2024 sudden stratospheric warming and its surface impacts. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 131, e2025JD045089 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kuipers Munneke, P. et al. Intense winter surface melt on an Antarctic ice shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 7615–7623 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Saba, G. K. et al. Winter and spring controls on the summer food web of the coastal West Antarctic Peninsula. Nat. Commun. 5, 4318 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ropert-Coudert, Y. et al. A complete breeding failure in an Adélie penguin colony correlates with unusual and extreme environmental events. Ecography 38, 111–113 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorological Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Marshall, G. J., Fogt, R. L., Turner, J. & Clem, K. R. Can current reanalyses accurately portray changes in Southern Annular Mode structure prior to 1979?. Clim. Dyn. 59, 3717–3740 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kosaka, Y. et al. The JRA-3Q Reanalysis. J. Meteorological Soc. Jpn. 102, 49–109 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Gillett, N. P. et al. The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Dev. 9, 3685–3697 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ciavarella, A. et al. Upgrade of the HadGEM3-A based attribution system to high resolution and a new validation framework for probabilistic event attribution. Weather Clim. Extremes 20, 9–32 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Christidis, N. et al. A New HadGEM3-A-Based System for Attribution of Weather- and Climate-Related Extreme Events. J. Clim. 26, 2756–2783 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang, X. B. et al. Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. -Clim. Change 2, 851–870 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Thompson, D. W. J., Baldwin, M. P. & Solomon, S. Stratosphere-troposphere coupling in the Southern Hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 62, 708–715 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. An introduction to the bootstrap. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1994).

  72. Otto, F. E. L., Massey, N., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Jones, R. G. & Allen, M. R. Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl050422 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Natural Environment Research Council highlight topic grant PICANTE (NE/Y503290/1). S.G.H. is financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) (project number 215406) and PGW analyses are produced with computational resources by the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) (projects s1242, s1308). D.B. acknowledges support from ANID-FONDECYT-1240190, ANID-FONDAP-1523A0002, and COPAS COASTAL ANID FB210021. We acknowledge Fraser Lott (Met Office) for producing and sharing the latest HadGEM3-A large ensemble dataset, and Steve Colwell (British Antarctic Survey) for providing the latest Antarctic weather station data. Moreover, we appreciate the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Working Group on Coupled Modelling and the contributing climate modeling groups for their efforts in producing and publicly sharing their model outputs (Supplementary Table 2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Planning, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Haosu Tang, Sihan Li & Julie M. Jones

  2. WSL Institute for the Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Davos, Switzerland

    Sergi González-Herrero

  3. British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK

    Andrew Orr & Michelle L. Maclennan

  4. Grantham Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

    Friederike E. L. Otto

  5. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    James A. Screen, Jennifer L. Catto & Charlie C. Suitters

  6. School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Kyle R. Clem

  7. Departamento de Meteorología, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile

    Deniz Bozkurt

  8. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Yiming Sun

Authors
  1. Haosu Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sihan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julie M. Jones
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergi González-Herrero
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrew Orr
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Friederike E. L. Otto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. James A. Screen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kyle R. Clem
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Deniz Bozkurt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jennifer L. Catto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Charlie C. Suitters
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Michelle L. Maclennan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yiming Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.T., S.L., and J.M.J. conceived and designed the study. H.T. conducted the investigation, curated and analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. S.L. and J.M.J. contributed to methodology development and formal analysis, and oversaw project administration. S.G.H. conducted the WRF experiments and assisted with the storyline attribution. A.O. contributed substantially to the interpretation of the results and to the critical revision of the manuscript. F.E.L.O., J.A.S., K.R.C., D.B., J.L.C., C.C.S., M.L.M., and Y.S. made important contributions to the interpretation of the results and to the manuscript revisions. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haosu Tang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, H., Li, S., Jones, J.M. et al. Unprecedented 2024 East Antarctic winter heatwave driven by polar vortex weakening and amplified by anthropogenic warming. npj Clim Atmos Sci (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01392-x

Download citation

  • Received: 03 December 2025

  • Accepted: 13 March 2026

  • Published: 01 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01392-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Polar–Midlatitude Interactions: Impacts on Weather Extremes and Climate Dynamics

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (npj Clim Atmos Sci)

ISSN 2397-3722 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene