Table 2 The clinicopatholgical characteristics of patients included in POPLAR and OAK trials.

From: Pan-cancer analysis of SETD2 mutation and its association with the efficacy of immunotherapy

 

SETD2 mutant

SETD2 nonmutant

P

Number of patients

24

545

 

Age(median, range, year)

63(39–80)

63(33–82)

0.34

Race (White/Other, %)

83/17

72/28

0.11

Sex (male/female, %)

63/37

62/38

0.49

Smoking status (current/former/never, %)

21/71/8

14/66/20

0.07

ECOG performance status (1/0, %)

67/33

64/36

0.40

Subtype (squamous/non-squamous, %)

38/62

28/72

0.15

Line of treatment (second/third, %)

63/37

73/27

0.13

Mean diameter of target lesion

78.88

77.52

0.45

Mean number of metastatic sites

3.04

2.91

0.33

KRAS mutant status (positive/negative/unknown, %)

0/21/79

7/22/71

0.11

EGFR mutant status (positive/negative/unknown, %)

8/63/29

9/69/22

0.50

EML4-ALK mutant status (positive/negative/unknown, %)

0/63/37

0/49/51

0.37

PD-L1 expressiona (positive/negative/unknown, %)

58/13/29

42/32/26

0.02

TMB (mean ± SE)

17.13 ± 2.32

10.65 ± 0.45

0.001

  1. ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncolgy group.
  2. aThe threshold for PD-L1 positivity and negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumor cells or immune cells.
  3. The bold values mean P < 0.05.