Table 3 Comparison of the proposed method’s predictive performance on various data distributions in five-fold cross-validation and test sets
Dataset cohort | Methods | IDH | 1p/19q | Pathology types | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACC | AUC | SPE | SEN | ACC | AUC | SPE | SEN | ACC | AUC | SPE | SEN | ||
Validation | CD | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.86 |
CL | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.83 | |
CM | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.87 | |
SSL-MISS-Net | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.72 | |
Test Set | CD | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.72 |
CL | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.70 | |
CM | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.72 | |
SSL-MISS-Net | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.87 | |