Table 1 Summary of PO clinical trials tested in the PFSratio-based analysis

From: Benchmarking progression-free survival ratio as primary endpoint in precision oncology clinical trials

Study

year(s)

Site

Tumor types treated

Type of molecular screening

Primary endpoint

PFSratio analysis

n° of patients evaluable for PFSratio

WINTHER (NCT01856296)

2013–2015

Multicentric, international

Advanced cancers that progressed on standard Tx

Targeted genomic (236 cancer-related genes panel) + transcriptomic (microarrays)

PFSratio

Proportion of patients with PFSratio >1.5

107

MASTER (NCT03127215)

2012–ongoing

Multicentric, national

Advanced rare cancers or cancers in young patients ( < 51 years) that progressed on standard Tx

WGS/WES + transcriptomic (RNAseq)

Feasibility and clinical relevance of comprehensive molecular analysis in rare cancers

Proportion of patients with PFSratio >1.3

255

MOSCATO 01 (NCT01566019)

2011–2016

Monocentric

Advanced cancers that progressed on standard Tx

Targeted genomic (40-75 cancer-related genes panel) or WES + transcriptomic (RNAseq)

PFSratio

Proportion of patients with PFSratio >1.3

194

POG570 (NCT02155621)

2012– ongoing

Monocentric

Advanced cancers that progressed on standard Tx

WGS + transcriptomic (RNAseq)

Feasibility and clinical relevance of comprehensive molecular analysis in advanced cancers

Not done

190

SHIVA (NCT01771458)

2012–2014

Multicentric, national

Advanced cancers that progressed on standard Tx

Targeted genomic (45 cancer-related genes panel) + IHC for ER, PR and AR

PFS

Proportion of patients with PFSratio >1.3

95

  1. AR androgen receptor, ER estrogen receptor, IHC immunohistochemistry, PFSratio progression free survival ratio, PR progesterone receptor, Tx treatment, WES whole exome sequencing, WGS whole genome sequencing.