Table 1 Classification performance of the TNTCM across different datasets

From: A full-automated tumor budding annotation approach in hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images of colorectal cancer

DATASETS

SPECIFICITY (95% CI)

SENSITIVITY (95% CI)

AUC (95% CI)

PUTH-IV

0.951 (0.934, 0.968)

0.935 (0.915, 0.955)

0.988 (0.979, 0.997)

TCGA-COAD-EV

0.889 (0.809, 0.968)

0.848 (0.758, 0.939)

0.921 (0.853, 0.990)

TCGA-READ-EV

0.733 (0.620, 0.847)

0.929 (0.862, 0.995)

0.929 (0.862, 0.995)

  1. Bold values highlight the optimal results (i.e., the best performance) for each metric across the compared methods.