Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Precision Oncology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj precision oncology
  3. articles
  4. article
Multi-omics fusion network for prediction of early recurrence in colorectal liver metastases
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 January 2026

Multi-omics fusion network for prediction of early recurrence in colorectal liver metastases

  • Ralph Saber1,2,
  • Mayra Carneiro2,
  • Emmanuel Montagnon2,
  • An Tang2,3,
  • Simon Turcotte2,4 &
  • …
  • Samuel Kadoury1,2 

npj Precision Oncology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1614 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer genomics
  • Cancer imaging
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Prognostic markers

Abstract

Nearly half of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases. While surgical removal offers a potential cure, the majority experience recurrence within two years. Accurate tools to predict the recurrence risk are lacking. This study proposes a multi-omics framework combining computed tomography, transcriptomic (RNA) sequencing, and the Clinical Risk Score (CRS) to predict the likelihood of two-year recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection. Our approach addresses undetected RNA transcripts by introducing generative adversarial imputation and leverages generative learning and transformers to manage high dimensional gene expression data. Imaging features are extracted using a foundation model alongside interpretable radiomics. Tested on a prospectively maintained dataset of 129 patients, the pipeline achieved an area under the curve of 0.75 ± 0.05, outperforming unimodal and bimodal approaches and the CRS. This assistive tool can improve risk stratification, inform patients of their expected outcomes, guide follow-up care and inspire clinical trials for post-operative treatments.

Similar content being viewed by others

A fusion model to predict the survival of colorectal cancer based on histopathological image and gene mutation

Article Open access 20 March 2025

Colorectal liver metastasis: molecular mechanism and interventional therapy

Article Open access 04 March 2022

Orosomucoid 1 promotes colorectal cancer progression and liver metastasis by affecting PI3K/AKT pathway and inducing macrophage M2 polarization

Article Open access 28 August 2023

Data availability

Anonymized imaging, RNA sequencing, and associated patient clinicopathological characteristics are available upon reasonable request from the study authors, conditional on approval by our Research Ethics Board. The underlying code to implement the proposed pipeline will be made publicly available on https://github.com/rksaber/recurrence_prediction.

Code availability

The underlying code to implement the proposed pipeline will be made publicly available on https://github.com/rksaber/recurrence_prediction.

References

  1. Siegel, R. L. et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70, 145–164 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leung, U. et al. Colorectal cancer liver metastases and concurrent extrahepatic disease treated with resection. Ann. Surg. 265, 158–165 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amoretti, M. et al. Production and detection of cold antihydrogen atoms. Nature 419, 456–459 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buisman, F. E. et al. Recurrence patterns after resection of colorectal liver metastasis are modified by perioperative systemic chemotherapy. World J. Surg. 44, 876–886 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tomlinson, J. S. et al. Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 4575–4580 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fong, Y., Fortner, J., Sun, R. L., Brennan, M. F. & Blumgart, L. H. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg. 230, 309–18; discussion 318–21 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wong, G. Y. M. et al. Performance of prognostic models incorporating KRAS mutation status to predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. HPB 24, 1316–1325 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teng, S. et al. Tissue-specific transcription reprogramming promotes liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. Cell Res. 30, 34–49 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, L., Sun, M., Wang, J. & Wan, S. Multi-omics based artificial intelligence for cancer research. In Cutting Edge Artificial Intelligence Spatial Transcriptomics and Proteomics Approaches Analyze Cancer, Vol. 163 of Advances in Cancer Research, (eds Madan, E., Fisher, P. B. & Gogna, R.) Ch. 9 303–356 (Academic Press, 2024).

  10. Wu, B. et al. Prognosis prediction of stage IV colorectal cancer patients by mRNA transcriptional profile. Cancer Med. 11, 4900–4912 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Staal, F. C. et al. Radiomics for the prediction of treatment outcome and survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Clin. Colorectal Cancer 20, 52–71 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Montagnon, E. et al. Radiomics analysis of baseline computed tomography to predict oncological outcomes in patients treated for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis. PLoS ONE 19, e0307815 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lubner, M. G. et al. CT textural analysis of hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer: pre-treatment tumor heterogeneity correlates with pathology and clinical outcomes. Abdom. Imaging 40, 2331–2337 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ye, S. et al. Association of CT-based delta radiomics biomarker with progression-free survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases undergo chemotherapy. Front. Oncol. 12, 843991 (2022).

  15. Aerts, H. J. W. L. et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat. Commun. 5, 4006 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, S. & Metaxas, D. On the challenges and perspectives of foundation models for medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 91, 102996 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wesdorp, N. et al. Advanced image analytics predicting clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review of the literature. Surg. Oncol. 38, 101578 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maaref, A. et al. Predicting the response to FOLFOX-based chemotherapy regimen from untreated liver metastases on baseline CT: a deep neural network approach. J. Digit. Imaging 33, 937–945 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Granata, V. et al. Radiomics and machine learning analysis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in colorectal liver metastases prognostic assessment. Radiol. Med. 128, 1310–1332 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luo, X. et al. Prognostication of colorectal cancer liver metastasis by CE-based radiomics and machine learning. Transl. Oncol. 47, 101997 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keyl, J. et al. Deep learning-based assessment of body composition and liver tumour burden for survival modelling in advanced colorectal cancer. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 14, 545–552 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J. & Maier-Hein, K. H. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 203–211 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Q. et al. Exploring tumor heterogeneity in colorectal liver metastases by imaging: unsupervised machine learning of preoperative ct radiomics features for prognostic stratification. Eur. J. Radiol. 175, 111459 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, M. et al. A multi-omics machine learning framework in predicting the survival of colorectal cancer patients. Comput. Biol. Med. 146, 105516 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lu, W. et al. Folfox treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms. Cancer Med. 9, 1419–1429 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun Tian, S. L., Fulong, W. & Chen, G. Identification of two subgroups of folfox resistance patterns and prediction of folfox response in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Investig. 39, 62–72 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Amniouel, S. & Jafri, M. S. High-accuracy prediction of colorectal cancer chemotherapy efficacy using machine learning applied to gene expression data. Front. Physiol. 14, 1272206 (2024).

  28. Kim, J. et al. Transcriptomes of the tumor-adjacent normal tissues are more informative than tumors in predicting recurrence in colorectal cancer patients. J. Transl. Med. 21, 209 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng, S. et al. Machine learning-based screening and validation of liver metastasis-specific genes in colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 14, 17679 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alleman, K. et al. Multimodal deep learning-based prognostication in glioma patients: a systematic review. Cancers 15, 545 (2023).

  31. Ho, D., Tan, I. B. H. & Motani, M. Predictive models for colorectal cancer recurrence using multi-modal healthcare data. In Proc. Conference Health, Inference, and Learning, CHIL ’21, 204–213 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).

  32. Chaudhary, K., Poirion, O. B., Lu, L. & Garmire, L. X. Deep learning-based multi-omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 24, 1248–1259 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pink, R. C. et al. Pseudogenes: pseudo-functional or key regulators in health and disease? RNA 17, 792–798 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zajac, P. et al. MAGE-A antigens and cancer immunotherapy. Front. Med. 4, 18 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weon, J. L. & Potts, P. R. The MAGE protein family and cancer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 37, 1–8 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lu, T. et al. Adamts18 deficiency promotes colon carcinogenesis by enhancing β-catenin and p38MAPK/ERK1/2 signaling in the mouse model of AOM/DSS-induced colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 8, 18979–18990 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, X. et al. Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays. Cancers 14, 2664 (2022).

  38. Wang, M., Miao, Z., Cen, H., He, J. & Wei, C. Long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) CHROMR promotes the expression of the CNNM1 gene by adsorbing hsa-mir-1299 to obtain drug resistance in diffuse large B lymphoma cells. Transl. Cancer Res. 11, 1362–1371 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, S.-L. et al. Lipocalin 2 negatively regulates cell proliferation and epithelial to mesenchymal transition through changing metabolic gene expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 108, 2176–2186 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Carion, N. et al. End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2020. ECCV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (eds Vedaldi, A., Bischof, H., Brox, T., Frahm, JM.) vol. 12346, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 (Springer, Cham, 2020).

  41. Kirillov, A. et al. Segment Anything. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 3992-4003, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00371 (Paris, France, 2023).

  42. Radford, A. et al. Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 139:8748-8763, Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/radford21a.html.

  43. Girdhar, R. et al. Imagebind: one embedding space to bind them all. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 15180-15190 (2023).

  44. Ma, J. et al. Segment anything in medical images. Nat. Commun. 15, 654 (2024).

  45. Thawakar, O. et al. XrayGPT: Chest Radiographs Summarization using Large Medical Vision-Language Models. In Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, 440–448 (Bangkok, Thailand, 2024).

  46. Pai, S. et al. Foundation model for cancer imaging biomarkers. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 354–367 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saber, R. et al. Radiomics using computed tomography to predict CD73 expression and prognosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases. J. Transl. Med. 21, 507 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wesdorp, N. et al. Identifying genetic mutation status in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases using radiomics-based machine-learning models. Cancers 15, 5648 (2023).

  49. Elforaici, M. E. A. et al. Semi-supervised vit knowledge distillation network with style transfer normalization for colorectal liver metastases survival prediction. Med. Image Anal. 99, 103346 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vorontsov, E., Tang, A., Pal, C. & Kadoury, S. Liver lesion segmentation informed by joint liver segmentation https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.07734 (2018).

  51. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with deseq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, Y., Parmigiani, G. & Johnson, W. E. Combat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data. NAR Genom. Bioinformatics 2, lqaa078 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yoon, J., Jordon, J. & van der Schaar, M. GAIN: Missing data imputation using generative adversarial nets https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02920 (2018).

  54. Saber, R., Routy, B., Turcotte, S. & Kadoury, S. RNA sequencing-based histological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer with generative adversarial data imputation. In Proc. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics 1–4 (IEEE, 2023).

  55. Xu, L., Skoularidou, M., Cuesta-Infante, A. & Veeramachaneni, K. Modeling tabular data using conditional GAN. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,Vol. 32 (2019).

  56. van Griethuysen, J. J. M. et al. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 77 21, e104–e107 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 58, 267–288 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chen, T. et al. A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 119:1597-1607. Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/chen20j.html (2020).

  59. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 770–778 (IEEE, 2016).

  60. Wang, F. & Liu, H. Understanding the behaviour of contrastive loss. In Proc.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2495–2504 (IEEE, 2021).

  61. Bakr, S. et al. Data for NSCLC radiogenomics (version 4). The Cancer Imaging Archive https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.7hs46erv Data set (2017).

  62. Messaoudi, N. et al. Prognostic value of CD73 expression in resected colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Oncoimmunology 9, 1746138 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Vickers, A. J., van Calster, B. & Steyerberg, E. W. A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis. Diagn. Progn. Res. 3, 18 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advance in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Guyon, I. et al.) 4765–4774 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017).

  65. Arik, S. Ö. & Pfister, T. TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35, 6679-6687, https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 (2021).

  66. Huang, X., Khetan, A., Cvitkovic, M. & Karnin, Z. Tabtransformer: tabular data modeling using contextual embeddings https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06678 (2020).

  67. Hollmann, N., Müller, S., Eggensperger, K. & Hutter, F. TabPFN: a transformer that solves small tabular classification problems in a second. In Proc. 11th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.K., S.T., and A.T. are researchers at the Research Center of the University of Montreal Hospital (CRCHUM), supported by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Santé (FRQS). RS is supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et Technologie (FRQNT). ST is supported by the FRQS Clinician Scientist Senior Salary Award (No. 349577). ST obtained support for RNA sequencing by a Terry Fox Marathon of Hope Cancer Centres Network grant and pre-clinical research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Turnstone Biologics. The CRCHUM Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Biobank and Prospective Database is supported by the Université de Montréal Roger des Groseillers Research Chair in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology. The funders played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript. The authors wish to express their gratitude to L. Rousseau, S. Langevin, and J. Bilodeau for their contributions to patient recruitment, biospecimen aquisition and processing, and to the CRCHUM histopathology core facility and R. Kosovskaia for RNA extraction and sequencing logistics. Moreover, M. Cerny, V. Hamilton, T. Derennes, and A. Ilinca are recognized for their work in editing segmentations and differentiating liver metastases from benign coexisting liver lesions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical laboratory at Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Ralph Saber & Samuel Kadoury

  2. Research Center of the University of Montreal Hospital (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada

    Ralph Saber, Mayra Carneiro, Emmanuel Montagnon, An Tang, Simon Turcotte & Samuel Kadoury

  3. Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    An Tang

  4. Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Service, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Department of Surgery, Univeristé de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Simon Turcotte

Authors
  1. Ralph Saber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mayra Carneiro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emmanuel Montagnon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. An Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Simon Turcotte
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Samuel Kadoury
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.C. preprocessed RNA sequencing data. E.M. performed CT image collection and preparation. A.T. supervised the manual validation of CT segmentations. S.K. and S.T. performed project conceptualization and supervision tasks. R.S. implemented the methodology, performed formal analysis, data curation, software analysis, validation, visualization, and wrote the original draft. All authors reviewed the manuscript prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Kadoury.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Outside the submitted work, S.T. has received consultant fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Turnstone Biologics, speaking fees from Celgene and AstraZeneca, and has research funding from Lovance Biotherapeutics and Turnstone Biologics. The remaining authors have no financial or non-financial competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saber, R., Carneiro, M., Montagnon, E. et al. Multi-omics fusion network for prediction of early recurrence in colorectal liver metastases. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01264-2

Download citation

  • Received: 28 May 2025

  • Accepted: 23 December 2025

  • Published: 10 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01264-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Onc.)

ISSN 2397-768X (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer