Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Precision Oncology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj precision oncology
  3. articles
  4. article
Preoperative positive ctDNA analysis is associated with the tumor microenvironment, and the risk of recurrence in non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 January 2026

Preoperative positive ctDNA analysis is associated with the tumor microenvironment, and the risk of recurrence in non-metastatic colorectal cancer

  • Mikail Gögenur1,
  • Lukas Balsevicius1,
  • Sarah Østrup Jensen2,3,
  • Nadia Øgaard2,3,
  • Iben Lyskjær2,3,
  • Tobias Freyberg Justesen1,
  • Michael Bzorek4,
  • Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn4,5,
  • Line Rosell Walker6,
  • Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen1,6,
  • Andreas Weinberger Rosen1,
  • Claus Lindbjerg Andersen2,3,7 &
  • …
  • Ismail Gögenur1,5,7 

npj Precision Oncology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 789 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Cancer
  • Oncology

Abstract

Recurrence after curative-intent surgery for colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related death. Circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used in the perioperative setting to detect residual disease. However, the association between preoperative ctDNA, the tumor microenvironment, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and recurrence is unknown. We explored the association between ctDNA and the tumor microenvironment in patients with non-metastatic CRC undergoing curative-intent surgery. ctDNA was assessed using a tumor-agnostic hypermethylated cfDNA test. Among 140 patients, ctDNA tested positive in 102 (72.9%) before surgery, with 38 (27.1%) tumors classified as immune infiltration high. ctDNA was associated with expression of cancer-metastasis pathways, while immune active phenotypes were associated with immune infiltration high tumors. ctDNA status could identify deficient mismatch repair tumors with an active immune phenotype. The results suggest that a positive ctDNA analysis before surgery is associated with a metastatic tumor microenvironment.

Similar content being viewed by others

The utility of ctDNA in detecting minimal residual disease following curative surgery in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article Open access 08 November 2022

Circulating tumour DNA and its clinical utility in predicting treatment response or survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article 19 April 2022

Molecular residual disease and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer

Article Open access 16 January 2023

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary data file. Code is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kapiteijn, E. et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 638–646 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bahadoer, R. R. et al. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 22, 29–42 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pagès, F. et al. International validation of the consensus Immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study. Lancet 391, 2128–2139 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bramsen, J. B. et al. Molecular-subtype-specific biomarkers improve prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer. Cell Rep. 19, 1268–1280 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guinney, J. et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 21, 1350–1356 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. El Sissy, C. et al. International validation of the immunoscore biopsy in patients with rectal cancer managed by a watch-and-wait strategy. J. Clin. Oncol. 42, 70–80 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henriksen, T. V. et al. Circulating tumor DNA in stage III colorectal cancer, beyond minimal residual disease detection, toward assessment of adjuvant therapy efficacy and clinical behavior of recurrences. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 507–517 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gögenur, M., Hadi, N. A. H., Qvortrup, C., Andersen, C. L. & Gögenur, I. ctDNA for risk of recurrence assessment in patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 29, 8666–8674 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen, S. Ø. et al. Novel DNA methylation biomarkers show high sensitivity and specificity for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer- A clinical biomarker discovery and validation study. Clin. Epigenetics 11, 158 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Øgaard, N. et al. Tumour-agnostic circulating tumour DNA analysis for improved recurrence surveillance after resection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Cancer 163, 163–176 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J. et al. An integrated TCGA pan-cancer clinical data resource to drive high-quality survival outcome Analytics. Cell 173, 400–416.e11 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dongre, A. & Weinberg, R. A. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 69–84 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ruan, K., Song, G. & Ouyang, G. Role of hypoxia in the hallmarks of human cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 107, 1053–1062 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, Y. & Zhou, B. P. TNF-α/NF-κB/Snail pathway in cancer cell migration and invasion. Br. J. Cancer 102, 639–644 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qian, D. C. et al. PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling and plasma membrane proteins are implicated in responsiveness to adjuvant dendritic cell vaccination for metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 399–406 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Danaher, P. et al. Gene expression markers of Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes. J. Immunother. Cancer 5, 18 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Louvi, A. & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. Notch and disease: a growing field. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 473–480 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, F. & Chen, Y. G. Regulation of TGF-β receptor activity. Cell Biosci. 2, 9 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fiehn, A. M. K., Reiss, B., Gögenur, M., Bzorek, M. & Gögenur, I. Development of a Fully automated method to obtain reproducible lymphocyte counts in patients with colorectal cancer. Appl. immunohistochem. Mol. morphology 30, 493–500 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zou, H. & Hastie, T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 67, 301–320 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moss J. et al. Comprehensive human cell-type methylation atlas reveals origins of circulating cell-free DNA in health and disease. Nature Communications [Internet]. 9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07466-6 (2018).

  23. Shirasawa, M. et al. Prognostic impact of peripheral blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in advanced-stage pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and its association with the immune-related tumour microenvironment. Br. J. Cancer 124, 925–932 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bettegowda, C. et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 224–ra24 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Forshew, T. et al. Noninvasive identification and monitoring of cancer mutations by targeted deep sequencing of plasma DNA. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 136–ra68 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boysen A. K. et al. Cell-free DNA levels and correlation to stage and outcome following treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Tumor Biol. 39, 1010428317730976 (2017).

  27. Anunobi, R. et al. Extracellular DNA promotes colorectal tumor cell survival after cytotoxic chemotherapy. J. Surg. Res. 226, 181–191 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Waldvogel Abramowski, S. et al. Cell-free nucleic acids are present in blood products and regulate genes of innate immune response. Transfusion 58, 1671–1681 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Korabecna, M. et al. Cell-free DNA in plasma as an essential immune system regulator. Sci. Rep. 10, 17478 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grabuschnig, S. et al. Putative origins of cell-free DNA in humans: a review of active and passive nucleic acid release mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–24 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gutierrez et al. Biomarker-directed, pembrolizumab-based combination therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: phase 2 KEYNOTE-495/KeyImPaCT trial interim results. Nat Med. 29, 1718–1727 (2023).

  32. Jensen, S., Øgaard, N., Nielsen, H. J., Bramsen, J. B. & Andersen, C. L. Enhanced performance of DNA methylation markers by simultaneous measurement of sense and antisense DNA strands after cytosine conversion. Clin. Chem. 66, 925–933 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dube, S., Qin, J. & Ramakrishnan, R. Mathematical analysis of copy number variation in a DNA sample using digital PCR on a nanofluidic device. PLoS ONE e2876, e2876 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Øgaard, N. et al. Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 131, 1707–1715 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bhattacharya, A. et al. An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data. Brief. Bioinforma. 22, bbaa163 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinforma. 32, 2847–2849 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D330–D338 (2019).

  39. Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics a J. Integr. Biol. 16, 284–287 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Biorender.com and Adobe Illustrator was used for figure preparation. This study was funded by the Misse and Valdemar Risoms Foundation (IG, no grant number), the Toyota Foundation (IG, no grant number), the Novo Nordic Foundation (CLA grants no. NNF17OC0025052 and NNF22OC0074415), and the Danish Cancer Society (CLA grant no. R231-A13845).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark

    Mikail Gögenur, Lukas Balsevicius, Tobias Freyberg Justesen, Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen, Andreas Weinberger Rosen & Ismail Gögenur

  2. Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    Sarah Østrup Jensen, Nadia Øgaard, Iben Lyskjær & Claus Lindbjerg Andersen

  3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    Sarah Østrup Jensen, Nadia Øgaard, Iben Lyskjær & Claus Lindbjerg Andersen

  4. Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark

    Michael Bzorek & Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn

  5. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn & Ismail Gögenur

  6. Department of Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark

    Line Rosell Walker & Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen

  7. Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Claus Lindbjerg Andersen & Ismail Gögenur

Authors
  1. Mikail Gögenur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lukas Balsevicius
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah Østrup Jensen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nadia Øgaard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Iben Lyskjær
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tobias Freyberg Justesen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael Bzorek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Line Rosell Walker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Andreas Weinberger Rosen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Claus Lindbjerg Andersen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ismail Gögenur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.G. and I.G. Methodology: M.G., I.G., and C.A. Investigation: M.G., S.J., N.Ø., I.L., M.B., R.D.B., and A.F. Visualization: M.G. and L.B. Funding acquisition: M.G., I.G., and C.L.A. Supervision: I.G. and C.A. Writing—original draft: M.G. Writing—review and editing: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikail Gögenur.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

MOMA_supplementary_file_1_130825

MOMA_supplementaryData_file_1_070424

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gögenur, M., Balsevicius, L., Jensen, S.Ø. et al. Preoperative positive ctDNA analysis is associated with the tumor microenvironment, and the risk of recurrence in non-metastatic colorectal cancer. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01288-2

Download citation

  • Received: 07 April 2025

  • Accepted: 13 January 2026

  • Published: 21 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01288-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Onc.)

ISSN 2397-768X (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer