Fig. 4: Comparison between the experimental and simulation results of the AgCN microwire growth behavior. | npj 2D Materials and Applications

Fig. 4: Comparison between the experimental and simulation results of the AgCN microwire growth behavior.

From: Controlled epitaxy and patterned growth of one-dimensional crystals via surface treatment of two-dimensional templates

Fig. 4

a–c SEM images of the AgCN microwires grown on pristine and plasma-treated WS2. d–f Simulation results obtained with various simulation parameters. The simulation results shown in d–f correspond to \({G}_{0}\) = 11, 7, and 3, respectively. Other parameter conditions; \(P=0.6,\,\alpha =2.\) g Comparison between the experimental and simulated AgCN microwire length distributions. The error bars indicate the standard deviation from 10 simulations. h Identified \({G}_{0}\) value and the experimental nucleation density. The error bars indicate the standard deviation from 10 ~ 15 samples.

Back to article page