Table 1 Characteristics of the ten studies included in the systematic review on the diagnostic and triage accuracy of symptom checkers.

From: The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review

First author (year)

Study design

Participants

Intervention

Symptom checker(s) used

Comparator

Outcome measures

Hageman (2015)21

Prospective cross-sectional study

86 hand clinic patients

Outpatients prospectively input data and symptoms into symptom checker to guess diagnosis

WebMD

Diagnosis from a hand surgeon

Diagnostic accuracy (top 3)

Semigran (2015)1

Vignette cross-sectional study

45 standardised vignettes:

15 emergency

15 non-emergency

15 self-care

Patient data and symptoms from various cases input into 23 symptom checkers

Ask MD, BetterMedicine. DocResponse, Doctor Diagnose, Drugs.com, EarlyDoc, Esagil, Family Doctor, FreeMD, HMS Family Health Guide, Healthline, Healthwise, Healthy Children, Isabel, iTriage, Mayo Clinic, MEDoctor, NHS Symptom Checkers, Steps2Care, Symcat, Symptify, Symptomate, WebMD

True diagnosis and appropriate triage advice

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis, top 3 and top 20 results)

Triage accuracy (overall, emergency, non-emergency, self-care)

Powley (2016)15

Prospective cross-sectional study

34 inflammatory arthritis patients

Patients completed NHS and WebMD symptom checkers with their presenting symptoms

NHS Choices, WebMD

Diagnosis from secondary care

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis, top 5)

Berry (2019)22

Retrospective cross-sectional study

ED records of 168 HIV/hepatitis C patients

Retrospective input of patient data into symptom checkers

Mayo Clinic, WebMD, Symptomate, Symcat, Isabel

Emergency department physician determined diagnosis

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis, top 3 and top 10)

Triage accuracy

Nazario Arancibia (2019)16

Prospective cross-sectional study

214 low-priority ED patients

Patients interviewed using questions from symptom checker to produce differentials

Mediktor

Emergency department diagnosis

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis, top 3, top 5, and top 10)

Shen (2019)17

Vignette cross-sectional study

42 vignettes of ophthalmic conditions

Cases inputted into symptom checker to record results

WebMD

True diagnosis and appropriate triage advice

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis and top 3). Triage accuracy (emergency, non-emergency)

Gilbert (2020)23

Vignette cross-sectional study

200 primary care vignettes

Vignettes used to input into symptom checkers and to assess general practitioners (GPs)

ADA, Babylon, Buoy, K health, Mediktor, Symptomate, WebMD, YourMD

True diagnosis and GPs

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis, top 3 and top 5)

Triage accuracy

Hill (2020)18

Vignette cross-sectional study

48 vignettes with ‘Australia-specific conditions’

Vignettes summarised and entered in symptom checkers

36 symptom checkers,

17 diagnostic only, 9 triage only advice. 10 that provide both.

True diagnosis and appropriate triage advice

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis, top 3 and top 10)

Triage accuracy (emergency, non-emergency, self-care)

Yu (2020)19

Retrospective cross-sectional study

100 ED patient records

Retrospectively using patient records to input information into symptom checkers

Drugs.com

FamilyDoctor

Given ED triage level

Triage accuracy

Yoshida (2021)20

Vignette cross-sectional study

27 vignettes of orofacial pain conditions

Vignettes of varied orofacial conditions input into symptom checkers

Esagil, FreeMD, Healthline, Isabel, Mayo Clinic, MEDoctor, Symcat, Symptify, Symptomate, WebMD, ADA

True diagnosis by resident in orofacial pain and oral medicine

Diagnostic accuracy (primary diagnosis, top 4)