Table 2 Performance of Transfer Learning Group and General Group in the retrospective datasets.

From: A multicenter study on two-stage transfer learning model for duct-dependent CHDs screening in fetal echocardiography

 

AUROC (95% CI)

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Specificity (95% CI)

F1

Transfer Learning Group

DenseNet-169

0.996 (0.995–0.997)

0.973 (0.929–0.991)

0.985 (0.953–0.996)

0.977

DenseNet-121

0.994 (0.992–0.995)

0.947 (0.894–0.975)

0.995 (0.968–0.999)

0.969

ResNet-101

0.972 (0.971–0.976)

0.913 (0.853–0.951)

0.970 (0.933–0.988)

0.935

VGG-16

0.951 (0.947–0.953)

0.873 (0.807–0.920)

0.890 (0.836–0.928)

0.865

General Group

DenseNet-169

0.985 (0.984–0.988)

0.953 (0.903–0.979)

0.980 (0.946–0.994)

0.963

DenseNet-121

0.992 (0.991–0.993)

0.947 (0.894–0.975)

0.990 (0.961–0.998)

0.966

ResNet-101

0.976 (0.973–0.979)

0.913 (0.853–0.951)

0.945 (0.901–0.971)

0.919

VGG-16

0.879 (0.872–0.885)

0.673 (0.591–0.746)

0.950 (0.907–0.974)

0.774

  1. Data are metric value or metric value (95% CI).