Table 2 The segmentation performance of each model on static ultrasound images

From: A deep learning based ultrasound diagnostic tool driven by 3D visualization of thyroid nodules

 

DeepLabv3+

Unet

Unet++

Attention Unet

TNVis

DSC

0.73 [0.57, 0.89]

0.80 [0.51, 1.00]

0.88 [0.74, 1.00]

0.88 [0.74, 1.00]

0.90 [0.76, 1.00]

HD95

38.6 [12.1, 65.1]

19.6 [0, 46.8]

20.1 [0, 45.2]

19.5 [0, 44.0]

15.1 [0, 38.6]

Acc

0.61 [0.42, 0.80]

0.83 [0.55, 1.00]

0.88 [0.73, 1.00]

0.89 [0.74, 1.00]

0.90 [0.75, 1.00]

Rec

0.98 [0.90, 1.00]

0.79 [0.49, 1.00]

0.88 [0.72, 1.00]

0.89 [0.74, 1.00]

0.91 [0.76, 1.00]

Spec

0.80 [0.61, 0.99]

0.89 [0.61, 1.00]

0.96 [0.86, 1.00]

0.97 [0.87, 1.00]

0.97 [0.86, 1.00]

IoU

0.60 [0.41, 0.79]

0.73 [0.45, 1.00]

0.80 [0.65, 0.95]

0.81 [0.66, 0.96]

0.84 [0.69, 0.99]

  1. DSC dice similarity coefficient, HD95 Hausdorff distance, Acc accuracy, Rec Recall, Spec Specificity, IoU Intersection over Union.
  2. Data in parentheses are 95% CIs.