Table 2 Summary of responses of participants to the PRE-USE and post-use QUESTIONNAIRES

From: Consumer insights from a feasibility study on remote and extended use of a novel non-invasive wearable fetal electrocardiogram monitor

PRE-USE QUESTIONNAIRE (N = 70)

Question

Measure

Value

Q1: Do you think a device that continuously monitors your baby’s heartbeat in pregnancy over days or weeks could be useful?

Median(IQR)a

10.0, (1.0)

Low score in the dataset

Count(Percentage)

4 (6%)

High score in the dataset

Count(Percentage)

66 (94%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

89–100%

Q2: How interested are you to wear a monitor that continuously records your baby’s heartbeat over days or weeks?

 

9.0 (3.0)

Low score in the dataset

Count(Percentage)

15 (21%)

High score in the dataset

Count(Percentage)

55 (79%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

69–88%

Q3: Do you think a monitor that continuously records your baby’s heartbeat over days or weeks would make you feel more or less reassured?

 

10.0 (2.0)

Low score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

8 (11%)

High score in the dataset

Count(Percentage)

62 (89%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

81–96%

Q4: Do you think a monitor that continuously records your baby’s heartbeat over days or weeks would make you feel more or less anxious?

 

2.0 (4.0)

Low score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

60 (86%)

High score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

10 (14%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

6–23%

Q5: Would you be happy to wear a baby heartbeat monitor device for 24 h?

 

8.0 (4.0)

Low score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

20 (29%)

High score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

50 (71%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

61–82%

Q6: Would you be happy to wear a fetal heartbeat monitor device for longer than 24 h over days or weeks?

 

6.0 (4.0)

Low score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

38 (54%)

High score in the dataset

Count(Percentage)

32 (46%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

34–57%

Q7: Would you be happy to wear this device at home?

 

9.0 (2.0)

Low score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

7 (10%)

High score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

63 (90%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

83–97%

Q8: If you have a complicated pregnancy or if your pregnancy became complicated would you be more or less likely to want to wear a fetal monitoring device?

 

10.0 (1.0)

Low score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

5 (7%)

High score in dataset

Count(Percentage)

65 (93%)

 

95% CI of Proportion of high score

87–99%

POST USE QUESTIONNAIRE (N = 70)

Question

Measure

Value

Comfort of Wearing the Device

Median(IQR)a

9.0 (2.0)

Comfort of Removing the Sensor Patch

Median(IQR)a

8.0 (2.8)

Skin Irritation

Median(IQR)a

1.0 (2.0)

Willingness to Wear the Device for 24 h or Longer

Median(IQR)a

8.0 (2.8)

Preference for the New Device Over CTG

Median(IQR)a

5.0 (2.0)

Overall Satisfaction with the Device

Median(IQR)a

9.0 (2.8)

  1. NB: As per convention, a Likert score of ≥7 was considered as high.
  2. aData was non-parametrically distributed.