Fig. 5: Comparison of FedWeight and FedAvg in capturing influential features. | npj Digital Medicine

Fig. 5: Comparison of FedWeight and FedAvg in capturing influential features.

From: FedWeight: mitigating covariate shift of federated learning on electronic health records data through patients re-weighting

Fig. 5

SHAP values were leveraged to identify feature importance, calculated from test data fed into the trained model. For mortality and ICU length of stay prediction, SHAP values were summed across all samples. For ventilator and sepsis prediction, SHAP values were aggregated across all time windows and samples, resulting in a one-dimensional vector of feature importance. We then calculated the Pearson correlation of feature importance between the federated and centralized model. ad Pearson correlation of SHAP-based feature importance for clinical outcome predictions in eICU. The models were validated on the bootstrapped test sets of five target hospitals (167, 199, 252, 420, 458). e Pearson correlation of SHAP-based feature importance for cross-dataset federated learning, where models were trained on eICU, and the correlation was computed on the bootstrapped test set of MIMIC-III. One-sided Wilcoxon test p values were calculated against the baseline. * denotes the p values <0.05, and ** represents the p values <0.01.

Back to article page