Table 5 Quality assessment of reported methods and results

CHEERS-2022 reporting criteria	Bernard et al.²⁴ (2022) ²⁴	Cloosterman et al.²⁵	de Jong et al.²⁶	Gumley et al.²⁷	Seppen et al.²⁸	Miranda et al.²⁹	van der Hout et al.³⁰
Methods
Health economic analysis plan	×	×	×	P	P	×	P
Study population	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Setting & location	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Comparators	✓	✓	P	✓	✓	✓	✓
Perspective	P	✓	✓	✓	P	✓	✓
Time horizon	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Discount rate	P	×	×	✓	✓	P	✓
Selection of outcomes	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Measurement of outcomes	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Valuation of outcomes	✓	P	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Measurement & Valuation of resources & costs	✓	P	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Currency, price date, & conversion	✓	×	P	✓	✓	✓	✓
Rationale & description of the model	NA	✓	NA	NA	NA	P	NA
Analytics & assumptions	✓	P	✓	✓	✓	P	✓
Characterizing heterogeneity	×	×	×	×	×	×	×
Characterizing distributional effects	×	×	×	×	×	×	×
Characterizing uncertainty	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Approach to engagement with people affected by the study	×	P	×	P	×	P	×
Results
Study parameters	P	×	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Summary of main results	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Effect of uncertainty	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Effect of engagement with people affected by the study	×	×	×	×	×	×	×

Note: Reporting criteria items from the CHEERS-2022 statement³⁴. Notation: ✓: reported fully; P: reported partially; ×: not reported; NA: not applicable.

Quick links

Search