Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluation of two easy-to-implement digital breathing interventions in the context of daily stress levels in a series of N-of-1 trials: results from the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians (ASIP) study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 January 2026

Evaluation of two easy-to-implement digital breathing interventions in the context of daily stress levels in a series of N-of-1 trials: results from the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians (ASIP) study

  • Valentin Max Vetter  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5003-77661,2,
  • Tobias Kurth  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-26201 &
  • Stefan Konigorski  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-68193,4,5,6 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1615 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Patient education
  • Research data
  • Clinical trial design

Abstract

Physicians face intense work-related stress, which can harm their health, increase the risk of medical errors, lower healthcare quality, and increase costs within the healthcare system. In this 4-week intervention study, individual-level and population-level effects of two short and easy-to-perform breathing exercises designed to reduce stress are evaluated among 76 physicians in residency in Germany in a series of N-of-1 trials. Levels of stress and levels of stress expected for the following day were assessed electronically every day via the StudyU App (protocol adherence: 91.9%). Average intervention effects were estimated using Bayesian linear regression models. They were overall small on the population level, but they showed large heterogeneity between individuals, with strong effects for selected individuals, with stress reduction of up to 3 points on a 1 to 10 stress scale. Thirty-one participants benefited from the anti-stress exercises. Three (mindfulness breathing) and seven participants (box breathing) had a ≥70% probability for a daily stress reduction of ≥0.5 points and thereby fulfilled our responder criteria. Of the 17 participants who completed the follow-up survey about 4.5 months after completion of the individual N-of-1 trials, 58% reported that they felt they had benefited from the intervention and 42% planned to use it in the future. The results highlight the value of personalized perspectives: while the studied interventions showed only small positive benefits for the “average person”, they may well help actual individual persons, here 10 of 76 or even 31 of 76 participants.

Similar content being viewed by others

Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials

Article Open access 09 January 2023

Effectiveness of deep breathing exercises on anxiety, depression and sleep quality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

Article Open access 23 July 2025

Effect of coherent breathing on mental health and wellbeing: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Article Open access 13 December 2023

Data availability

The study setup, all information on the protocol of the conducted N-of-1 trials as well as all data collected as part of the N-of-1 trials are publicly available through the StudyU data repository at https://designer.studyu.health (mindfulness breathing: “ASIP-Studie: Anti-Stress Übung”, box breathing: “ASIP-Studie: Box-Atmung”). All data used to produce the results shown in this manuscript (including the data from the baseline and follow-up questionnaires collected through REDCap) are published at https://github.com/HIAlab/ASIP. Statistical code used to produce all statistical analyses and figures is available at https://github.com/HIAlab/ASIP.

References

  1. Stucky, E. R. et al. Intern to attending: assessing stress among physicians. Acad. Med. 84, 251–257 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace, J. E., Lemaire, J. B. & Ghali, W. A. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet 374, 1714–1721 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson, W. T. et al. Challenge of culture, conscience, and contract to general practitioners’ care of their own health: qualitative study. BMJ 323, 728–731 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fahrenkopf, A. M. et al. Rates of medication errors among depressed and burnt out residents: prospective cohort study. BMJ 336, 488–491 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shanafelt, T. D. et al. Burnout and self-reported patient care in an internal medicine residency program. Ann. Intern. Med. 136, 358–367 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goehring, C. et al. Psychosocial and professional characteristics of burnout in Swiss primary care practitioners: a cross-sectional survey. Swiss Med. Wkly. 135, 101–108 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dyrbye, L. N. et al. Association of clinical specialty with symptoms of burnout and career choice regret among US resident physicians. JAMA 320, 1114–1130 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klein, J. et al. Burnout and perceived quality of care among German clinicians in surgery. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 22, 525–530 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramirez, A. et al. Burnout and psychiatric disorder among cancer clinicians. Br. J. Cancer 71, 1263–1269 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyrbye, L. N. et al. Burnout and suicidal ideation among US medical students. Ann. Intern. Med. 149, 334–341 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu, K. & Marshall, V. Prevalence of depression and distress in a large sample of. Am. J. Psychiatry 144, 1561–1566 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raspe, M. et al. Arbeitsbedingungen und Gesundheitszustand junger Ärzte und professionell Pflegender in deutschen Krankenhäusern. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforsch. Gesundheitsschutz 63, 113–121 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank, E. & Dingle, A. D. Self-reported depression and suicide attempts among US women physicians. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 1887–1894 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graham, J. et al. How hospital consultants cope with stress at work: implications for their mental health. Stress Health. 17, 85–89 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van der Heijden, F. et al. Suicidal thoughts among medical residents with burnout. Arch. Suicide Res. 12, 344–346 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panagopoulou, E., Montgomery, A. & Benos, A. Burnout in internal medicine physicians: differences between residents and specialists. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 17, 195–200 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cannon, W. B. Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage (D. Appleton and Company, 1915).

  18. Chrousos, G. P. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5, 374–381 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D. & Miller, G. E. Psychological stress and disease. JAMA 298, 1685–1687 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chrousos, G. P. and P.W. Gold, The concepts of stress and stress system disorders: overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. JAMA 267, 1244–1252 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. McEwen, B. S. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 171–179 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C. & Gordon, L. U. Strategies for measuring stress in studies of psychiatric and physical disorders. in Measuring Stress: a Guide for Health and Social Scientists, Vol 28, 3–26 (Oxford Academic, 1995).

  23. Dhabhar, F. S. Effects of stress on immune function: the good, the bad, and the beautiful. Immunol. Res. 58, 193–210 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Padro, C. J. & Sanders, V. M. Neuroendocrine regulation of inflammation. Semin. Immunol. 26, 357–368 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sweitzer, M. M. et al. Delay discounting and smoking: association with the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence but not cigarettes smoked per day. Nicotine Tob. Res. 10, 1571–1575 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pomerleau, O. F. & Pomerleau, C. S. Research on stress and smoking: progress and problems. Br. J. Addict. 86, 599–603 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sinha, R. Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1141, 105–130 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fields, S. A. et al. The relationship between stress and delay discounting: a meta-analytic review. Behav. Pharmacol. 25, 434–444 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miller, G. E., Cohen, S. & Ritchey, A. K. Chronic psychological stress and the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines: a glucocorticoid-resistance model. Health Psychol. 21, 531 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kivimäki, M. et al. Work stress in the etiology of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 32, 431–442 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Turner, A. I. et al. Psychological stress reactivity and future health and disease outcomes: a systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychoneuroendocrinology 114, 104599 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Firth-Cozens, J. & Greenhalgh, J. Doctors’ perceptions of the links between stress and lowered clinical care. Soc. Sci. Med. 44, 1017–1022 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yates, S. W. Physician stress and burnout. Am. J. Med. 133, 160–164 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pottier, P. et al. Effect of stress on clinical reasoning during simulated ambulatory consultations. Med. Teach. 35, 472–480 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tawfik, D. S. et al. Physician burnout, well-being, and work unit safety grades in relationship to reported medical errors. Mayo Clin. Proc. 93, 1571–1580 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Owoc, J. et al. Burnout, well being, and self reported medical errors among physicians. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 131, 626–632 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brown, S. D., Goske, M. J. & Johnson, C. M. Beyond substance abuse: stress, burnout, and depression as causes of physician impairment and disruptive behavior. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 6, 479–485 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van den Hombergh, P. et al. High workload and job stress are associated with lower practice performance in general practice: an observational study in 239 general practices in the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv. Res. 9, 1–8 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. West, C. P. et al. Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. JAMA 302, 1294–1300 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shanafelt, T. D. et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann. Surg. 251, 995–1000 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Halbesleben, J. R. & Rathert, C. Linking physician burnout and patient outcomes: exploring the dyadic relationship between physicians and patients. Health Care Manag. Rev. 33, 29–39 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Regehr, C. et al. Interventions to reduce the consequences of stress in physicians: a review and meta-analysis. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 202, 353–359 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shanafelt, T., Goh, J. & Sinsky, C. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern. Med. 177, 1826–1832 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Han, S. et al. Estimating the attributable cost of physician burnout in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 170, 784–790 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Willard-Grace, R. et al. Burnout and health care workforce turnover. Ann. Fam. Med. 17, 36–41 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rutledge, T. et al. A real-time assessment of work stress in physicians and nurses. Health Psychol. 28, 194 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Linzer, M. et al. Predicting and preventing physician burnout: results from the United States and the Netherlands. Am. J. Med. 111, 170–175 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Taylor, H., Strauss, C. & Cavanagh, K. Can a little bit of mindfulness do you good? A systematic review and meta-analyses of unguided mindfulness-based self-help interventions. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 89, 102078 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zaccaro, A. et al. How breath-control can change your life: a systematic review on psycho-physiological correlates of slow breathing. Front. Human Neurosci. 12, 353 (2018).

  50. Röttger, S. et al. The effectiveness of combat tactical breathing as compared with prolonged exhalation. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 46, 19–28 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bouchard, S. et al. Using biofeedback while immersed in a stressful videogame increases the effectiveness of stress management skills in soldiers. PloS ONE 7, e36169 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dillard, C. C. et al. Slow breathing reduces biomarkers of stress in response to a virtual reality active shooter training drill. Healthcare 11, 2351 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Balban, M. Y. et al. Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal. Cell Rep. Med. 4, 100895 (2023).

  54. Fincham, G. W. et al. Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: a meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Sci. Rep. 13, 432 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Boettcher, J. et al. Internet-based mindfulness treatment for anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Behav. Ther. 45, 241–253 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Carrington, P. et al. The use of meditation–relaxation techniques for the management of stress in a working population. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 22, 221–231 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kühberger, A. et al. The significance fallacy in inferential statistics. BMC Res. Notes 8, 84 (2015).

  58. McShane, B. B. et al. Abandon statistical significance. Am. Stat. 73, 235–245 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L. & Lazar, N. A. Moving to a world beyond “p< 0.05”, 1–19 (Taylor & Francis, 2019).

  60. Witmer, J. (ed.) Journal of Statistics Education, Vol 27, 136–137 (2019).

  61. Rosenberg, A. & Hamiel, D. Reducing test anxiety and related symptoms using a biofeedback respiratory practice device: a randomized control trial. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 46, 69–82 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. James, T. A., James, D. & Larkey, L. K. Heart-focused breathing and perceptions of burden in Alzheimer’s caregivers: An online randomized controlled pilot study. Geriatr. Nurs. 42, 397–404 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Goodwin, A. M. et al. Protocol for randomized personalized trial for stress management compared to standard of care. Front. Psychol. 14, 1233884 (2023).

  64. Zainal, N. H. & Newman, M. G. Mindfulness enhances cognitive functioning: a meta-analysis of 111 randomized controlled trials. Health Psychol. 18, 369–395 (2024).

  65. Holman, D., Johnson, S. & O’Connor, E. Stress management interventions: improving subjective psychological well-being in the workplace. In Handbook of well-being, 1–13 (DEF, 2018).

  66. Nikles, J. & Mitchell, G. The essential guide to N-of-1 trials in health, Vol. 10 (Springer, 2015).

  67. Hawksworth, O. et al. A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials. Trials 25, 263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zhou, L. et al. Analyzing population-level trials as N-of-1 trials: an application to gait. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 38, 101282 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Vetter, V. M., Kurth, T. and Konigorski, S. Evaluation of easy-to-implement anti-stress interventions in a series of N-of-1 trials: study protocol of the anti-stress intervention among physicians study. Front. Psychiatry 15, 1420097 (2024).

  70. Daza, E. J. Causal analysis of self-tracked time series data using a counterfactual framework for N-of-1 Trials. Methods Inf. Med 57, e10–e21 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Piccininni, M. et al. Causal inference for N-of-1 trials. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.10360.

  72. Collins, F. S. & Varmus, H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 793–795 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Schork, N. J. Personalized medicine: time for one-person trials. Nature 520, 609–611 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ginsburg, G. S. & Phillips, K. A. Precision medicine: from science to value. Health Aff. 37, 694–701 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kim-McManus, O. et al. A framework for N-of-1 trials of individualized gene-targeted therapies for genetic diseases. Nat. Commun. 15, 9802 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Guyatt, G. et al. Determining optimal therapy—randomized trials in individual patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 314, 889–892 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Gabler, N. B. et al. N-of-1 trials in the medical literature: a systematic review. Med. Care 49, 761–768 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kravitz, R. L. et al. Effect of Mobile device–supported single-patient multi-crossover trials on treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 178, 1368–1377 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nurmi, J. et al. Biofeedback and digitalized motivational interviewing to increase daily physical activity: series of factorial N-of-1 randomized controlled trials piloting the precious app. JMIR Form. Res. 7, e34232 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sniehotta, F. F. et al. Testing self-regulation interventions to increase walking using factorial randomized N-of-1 trials. Health Psychol. 31, 733 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Justo, C. F. Reducción de los niveles de estrés y ansiedad en médicos de Atención Primaria mediante la aplicación de un programa de entrenamiento en conciencia plena (mindfulness). Aten. Primaria 42, 564–570 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  82. McCue, J. D. & Sachs, C. L. A stress management workshop improves residents’ coping skills. Arch. Intern. Med. 151, 2273–2277 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Saadat, H. et al. Wellness program for anesthesiology residents: a randomized, controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 56, 1130–1138 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sood, A. et al. Stress management and resilience training among Department of Medicine faculty: a pilot randomized clinical trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 26, 858–861 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Schumer, M. C., Lindsay, E. K. & Creswell, J. D. Brief mindfulness training for negative affectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Consult Clin. Psychol. 86, 569–583 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Creswell, J. D. Mindfulness interventions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 491–516 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kristensen, T. S. et al., The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 31, 438–449 (2005).

  88. Nübling, M. et al. Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen—Erprobung eines Messinstrumentes (COPSOQ). in Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (Wirtschaftsverlag NW, 2005).

  89. Siegrist, J. et al. A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 82, 1005–1013 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Klein, E. M. et al. The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale – psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample. BMC Psychiatry 16, 159 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Braunheim, L. et al. The effects of effort-reward imbalance on the job, overcommitment, and income on life satisfaction in Germany from a longitudinal perspective. Soc. Sci. Med. 341, 116523 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Janke, S. & Glöckner-Rist, A. Deutsche version der satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). in (eds Danner, D. & Glöckner-Rist, A.) Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. (Mannheim: GESIS, 2014).

  93. Kase, S. M. et al. A pilot study exploring interventions for physician distress in pediatric subspecialists. Pediatr. Res. 88, 398–403 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Konigorski, S. et al. StudyU: a platform for designing and conducting innovative digital N-of-1 trials. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e35884 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Vohra, S. et al. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 statement. BMJ 350, h1738 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Harris, P. A. et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J. Biomed. Inform. 95, 103208 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Rödel, A. et al. Fragebogen zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen. Z. Differ. Diagn. Psychol. 25, 227–238 (2004).

  98. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 385–396 (1983).

  99. Beschoner, P. et al. The prevalence of effort-reward imbalance and its associations with working conditions, psychosocial resources and burden among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of the egePan-Voice study. PloS ONE 18, e0287509 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Koch, P. et al. The effect of effort-reward imbalance on the health of childcare workers in Hamburg: a longitudinal study. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 12, 1–9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189, 4–7 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. & Miller, J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4, 114–123 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Yang, J., Steingrimsson, J. A. & Schmid, C. H. Sample size calculations for n-of-1 trials. Preprint at arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.08970 (2021).

  104. Lesage, F.-X., Berjot, S. & Deschamps, F. Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup. Med. 62, 600–605 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Naughton, F. & Johnston, D. A starter kit for undertaking n-of-1 trials. Eur. Health Psychol. 16, 196–205 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Lu, C. P. et al. The effect of mindfulness-based interventions on reducing stress in future health professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 16, 765–792 (2023).

  107. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ellen Zitzmann for her valuable input and help in developing the mindfulness-based breathing exercise and recording the intervention audio files.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Valentin Max Vetter & Tobias Kurth

  2. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases (including Division of Lipid Metabolism), Biology of Aging working group, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Valentin Max Vetter

  3. Digital Health—Machine Learning Group, Hasso-Plattner-Institute for Digital Engineering, Potsdam, Germany

    Stefan Konigorski

  4. Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Stefan Konigorski

  5. Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

    Stefan Konigorski

  6. Digital Engineering Faculty, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Stefan Konigorski

Authors
  1. Valentin Max Vetter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tobias Kurth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Konigorski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

V.M.V.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, project administration. T.K.: conceptualization, resources, supervision, writing—review and editing. S.K.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, supervision, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Valentin Max Vetter or Stefan Konigorski.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

V.M.V.: none. T.K.: reports outside of the submitted, to have received research grants from the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). He also received personal compensation from Eli Lilly & Company, Novartis, the BMJ, and Frontiers. S.K.: none.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplements.

Checklist.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vetter, V.M., Kurth, T. & Konigorski, S. Evaluation of two easy-to-implement digital breathing interventions in the context of daily stress levels in a series of N-of-1 trials: results from the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians (ASIP) study. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02317-3

Download citation

  • Received: 13 April 2025

  • Accepted: 22 December 2025

  • Published: 10 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02317-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Effective Trialing of Digital Interventions

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing