Table 1 Characteristics of included studies evaluating wearable EEG for MCI detection

From: Wearable EEG devices in the detection of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review

Author (Year)

Country

Publication type

Setting

MCI diagnostic criteria

Sample size (MCI/HC)

Mean age, years (MCI/HC)

Female, % (MCI/HC)

Education, years (MCI/HC)

Baseline cognition (MCI/HC)

Rutkowski et al. (2023a)33

Poland

Journal article

Laboratory

MoCA ≤ 25

18/9

70.8

96.3

NR

MoCA: 20.2/27.7

Boudaya et al. (2024)34

Germany

Journal article

NR

CERAD task-based scoring

13/11

63–83

72.8/58.3

NR

NR

Wu et al. (2023)35

China

Journal article

NR

MoCA ≤ 26, MMSE ≥ 24

44/42

68.8/67.7

52.3/45.2

9.7/10.2

MoCA: 21.7/27.2; MMSE: 25.3/27.5

Li et al. (2023)36

China

Journal article

Laboratory

MoCA < 26 + linical interview

61/59

71.0/67.9

44.0/53.0

5.1/7.9

MoCA: 23.2/27.1; MMSE: 25.1/28.8

Chai et al. (2023)37

China

Journal article

Laboratory

MoCA ≤ 26,

MMSE ≥ 24

40/39

69.7/69.5

42.5/53.8

5.9/6.3

MoCA: 21.6/27.2; MMSE: 25.3/28.7

Perez-Valero et al. (2022)30

Spain

Journal article

Hospital

CSF biomarkers or β-amyloid PET

5/8

73.4/67.0

0/87.5

NR

NR

Lee et al. (2022a)38

Korea

Journal article

Hospital

SCID-I and MINI

21/21

74.7/73.7

66.7/71.4

7.9/9.3

NR

Lee et al. (2022b)39

Korea

Journal article

Hospital

Petersen/McKhann criteria + K-MMSE-2

21/22

72.5/68.3

62.0/68.0

8.0/9.8

MoCA: 16.0/22.9; MMSE: 22.1/27.5

Boudaya et al. (2022)40

Germany

Conference Paper

NR

CERAD task-based scoring

9/8

63-83

NR

NR

NR

Jiang et al. (2019)32

China

Journal article

Community

Petersen Diagnostic Criteria

152/184

71.6/71.7

NR

8.2/9.4

MoCA: 23.2/28.3

Jin-Young et al. (2022)41

Korea

Journal article

Hospital

SNSB-C ≤ 16th percentile

151/69

74.7/73.1

44.4/47.8

10.3/10.3

NR

Chen et al. (2023)42

China

Conference Paper

Hospital

MRI, CSF, neuropsychological scales

32/27

NR

NR

NR

NR

Rutkowski et al. (2021a)43

Japan

Conference Paper

Laboratory

MoCA ≤ 25

22/23

73.6 ± 4.95

66.7

NR

NR

Rutkowski et al. (2022)44

Japan

Conference Paper

Laboratory

MoCA ≤ 25

22/23

73.6 ± 4.95

66.7

NR

NR

Rutkowski et al. (2023b)45

Japan

Conference Paper

Laboratory

MoCA ≤ 25

22/23

73.6 ± 4.95

66.7

NR

NR

Rutkowski et al. (2021b)46

Japan

Conference Paper

Laboratory

MoCA ≤ 25

10/5

74.3 ± 6.4

73.3

NR

NR

Meghdadi et al. (2021)51

USA

Journal article

NR

DSM-5/comprehensive criteria (1–1.5 SD)

53/55

71.2/68.8

38.0/45.0

NR (58%/50% university)

MMSE: 26.8/29.7

Segaert et al. (2022)47

UK

Journal article

Hospital

Petersen criteria

23/23

70.0/72.0

56.5/52.2

14.0/16.0

ACE-R: 85/95

Xue et al. (2024)48

China

Journal article

NR

MoCA ≤ 26

40/40

62.3/2.5

50.0/40.0

6.0/8.5

MoCA: 20.3/27.9; MMSE: 25.3/28.7

Jiang et al. (2025)49

China

Journal article

Community

2018 Chinese Dementia Guidelines

21/20

70.3/70.0

28.6/40.0

9.5/11.1

MoCA: 19.9/26.7; MMSE: 26.7/28.1

Hata et al. (2025)50

Japan

Journal article

Hospital

CDR = 0.5

48/121

66.7/74.3

37.8/33.9

NR

MMSE: 25.7/29.7

  1. Data collection settings were categorized as follows: Laboratory, controlled research environments; Hospital, clinical healthcare facilities including memory clinics and neurology departments; Community, community health centers or primary care settings.
  2. ACE-R Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised, CDR Clinical Dementia Rating, CERAD Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DSM-5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, HC healthy controls, K-MMSE-2 Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination-2, MCI mild cognitive impairment, MINI Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NR not reported, PET positron emission tomography, SCID-I, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, SNSB-C Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core.