Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Deep learning characterizes depression and suicidal ideation in young adults from eye movements
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 March 2026

Deep learning characterizes depression and suicidal ideation in young adults from eye movements

  • Kleanthis Avramidis1,
  • Woojae Jeong2,3,
  • Aditya Kommineni2,
  • Sudarsana R. Kadiri2,
  • Marcus Ma1,
  • Colin McDaniel4,
  • Myzelle Hughes4,
  • Thomas McGee5,
  • Elsi Kaiser6,
  • Dani Byrd6,
  • Assal Habibi4,
  • B. Rael Cahn7,
  • Idan A. Blank5,
  • Kristina Lerman1,
  • Takfarinas Medani2,
  • Richard M. Leahy2,3 &
  • …
  • Shrikanth Narayanan1,2,6,8 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1776 Accesses

  • 29 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computer science
  • Human behaviour
  • Learning algorithms

Abstract

Objective biobehavioral markers for mental health conditions remain elusive, with diagnosis typically relying on self-reports and clinical interviews. We investigate eye tracking as a potential marker of attentional and mood biases associated with symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation from self-reported screening questionnaires. We analyze eye movements from 126 young adults during reading and responding to emotionally loaded sentences. A deep learning framework was designed to account for intra-trial and inter-trial variations in eye movements, achieving an AUC of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.766–0.819) for identifying depression/suicidality against healthy controls, and 0.826 (95% CI: 0.798–0.853) for suicidality specifically. The model also exhibited moderate accuracy in differentiating depressed from suicidal individuals (AUC: 0.609, 95% CI: 0.569–0.646). Discriminative patterns were more pronounced during response generation and for stimuli of negative sentiment. These findings suggest that eye tracking can provide objective markers of self-reported symptom severity by measuring the impact of emotional stimuli on oculomotor control.

Similar content being viewed by others

Prevalence of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideas and associated factors, in particular sensory impairments, in a population of Bashkortostan in Russia

Article Open access 12 October 2023

AI-assisted multi-modal information for the screening of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article Open access 16 August 2025

Egoistic versus Prosocial Decision Making: an Eye Movement Data Report

Article Open access 22 January 2025

Data availability

The full set of anonymized eye-tracking recordings and annotations are available upon request to shri@usc.edu.

Code availability

All presented analyses were implemented in Python (v12.0). All models were trained using two NVIDIA RTX 6000 GPUs within a secure server. The associated code is publicly accessible at https://github.com/usc-sail/precog-eye-dl.

References

  1. for Health Metrics, I. & Evaluation. Global health data exchange (ghdx). https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ (2023). Accessed 4 March 2023.

  2. Organization, W. H. Suicide. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide (2023). Accessed 23 April 2025.

  3. Abi-Dargham, A. et al. Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: state of the field. World Psychiatry 22, 236–262 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bone, D., Lee, C.-C., Chaspari, T., Gibson, J. & Narayanan, S. Signal processing and machine learning for mental health research and clinical applications [perspectives]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34, 196–195 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Aung, M. S. & Rentfrow, P. J. Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 18, 83–90 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Funder, D. C. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior?. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2, 396–403 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hauser, T. U., Skvortsova, V., De Choudhury, M. & Koutsouleris, N. The promise of a model-based psychiatry: building computational models of mental ill health. Lancet Digital Health 4, e816–e828 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, L. et al. Speech-and text-based classification of neuropsychiatric conditions in a multidiagnostic setting. Nat. Ment. Health 1, 971–981 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schmaal, L. et al. ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 172 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Aguiar Neto, F. S. & Rosa, J. L. G. Depression biomarkers using non-invasive eeg: a review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 105, 83–93 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dennis, T. A. & Solomon, B. Frontal eeg and emotion regulation: electrocortical activity in response to emotional film clips is associated with reduced mood induction and attention interference effects. Biol. Psychol. 85, 456–464 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murray, E. A., Wise, S. P. & Drevets, W. C. Localization of dysfunction in major depressive disorder: prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Biol. Psychiatry 69, e43–e54 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Botteron, K. N., Raichle, M. E., Drevets, W. C., Heath, A. C. & Todd, R. D. Volumetric reduction in left subgenual prefrontal cortex in early onset depression. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 342–344 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Skaramagkas, V. et al. Review of eye tracking metrics involved in emotional and cognitive processes. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 16, 260–277 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Singley, A. T. M. & Bunge, S. A. Beyond eye gaze: what else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development?. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 25, 69–91 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stolicyn, A., Steele, J. D. & Seriès, P. Prediction of depression symptoms in individual subjects with face and eye movement tracking. Psychol. Med. 52, 1784–1792 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsypes, A., Owens, M. & Gibb, B. E. Suicidal ideation and attentional biases in children: An eye-tracking study. J. Affect. Disord. 222, 133–137 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramey, M. M., Yonelinas, A. P. & Henderson, J. M. Conscious and unconscious memory differentially impact attention: eye movements, visual search, and recognition processes. Cognition 185, 71–82 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gotlib, I. H., Krasnoperova, E., Yue, D. N. & Joormann, J. Attentional biases for negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depression. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 113, 127 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suslow, T., Junghanns, K. & Arolt, V. Detection of facial expressions of emotions in depression. Percept. Mot. Skills 92, 857–868 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sriram, H., Conati, C. & Field, T. Classification of alzheimer’s disease with deep learning on eye-tracking data. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 104–113 (2023).

  22. Kobo, O., Meltzer-Asscher, A., Berant, J. & Schonberg, T. Classification of depression tendency from gaze patterns during sentence reading. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 93, 106015 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hodgson, T. L., Parris, B. A., Gregory, N. J. & Jarvis, T. The saccadic stroop effect: evidence for involuntary programming of eye movements by linguistic cues. Vis. Res. 49, 569–574 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hollingworth, A. & Bahle, B. Eye tracking in visual search experiments. Spatial Learning and Attention Guidance 23–35 (2020).

  25. Spitzer, R. L. et al. Validation and utility of a self-report version of prime-md: the phq primary care study. Jama 282, 1737–1744 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Joormann, J. & Gotlib, I. H. Emotion regulation in depression: relation to cognitive inhibition. Cognition Emot. 24, 281–298 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maalouf, F. et al. Bias to negative emotions: a depression state-dependent marker in adolescent major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 198, 28–33 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cavanagh, J. F., Wiecki, T. V., Kochar, A. & Frank, M. J. Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 143, 1476 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, S. M. & Krajbich, I. Gaze amplifies value in decision making. Psychol. Sci. 30, 116–128 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shneidman, E. S.Suicide as Psychache: A Clinical Approach to Self-destructive Behavior (Jason Aronson, 1993).

  31. Rudd, M. D. The prevalence of suicidal ideation among college students. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 19, 173–183 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kroenke, K. et al. The phq-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J. Affect. Disord. 114, 163–173 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. & Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the gad-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166, 1092–1097 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wu, H. et al. Timesnet: Temporal 2d-variation modeling for general time series analysis. International Conference on Learning Representations (2023).

  35. Szegedy, C. et al. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–9 (2015).

  36. Sundararajan, M., Taly, A. & Yan, Q. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 3319–3328 (PMLR, 2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under cooperative agreement No. N660012324006. The content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    Kleanthis Avramidis, Marcus Ma, Kristina Lerman & Shrikanth Narayanan

  2. Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    Woojae Jeong, Aditya Kommineni, Sudarsana R. Kadiri, Takfarinas Medani, Richard M. Leahy & Shrikanth Narayanan

  3. Alfred E. Mann Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    Woojae Jeong & Richard M. Leahy

  4. Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    Colin McDaniel, Myzelle Hughes & Assal Habibi

  5. Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA

    Thomas McGee & Idan A. Blank

  6. Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    Elsi Kaiser, Dani Byrd & Shrikanth Narayanan

  7. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    B. Rael Cahn

  8. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    Shrikanth Narayanan

Authors
  1. Kleanthis Avramidis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Woojae Jeong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aditya Kommineni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sudarsana R. Kadiri
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marcus Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Colin McDaniel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Myzelle Hughes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas McGee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Elsi Kaiser
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dani Byrd
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Assal Habibi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. B. Rael Cahn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Idan A. Blank
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kristina Lerman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Takfarinas Medani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Richard M. Leahy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Shrikanth Narayanan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.A. contributed to the conception, design, analysis, and evaluation of the computational framework for eye movement analysis. K.A. and M.M. pre-processed the eye-tracking recordings. W.J., C.M., M.H., and T.M. contributed to the experimental design and acquisition of the data. D.B., A.H., R.C., Th.M., I.B., K.L., R.L., and S.N. contributed to the conception and design of the experimental procedure and data collection protocol. W.J., A.K., S.K., M.M., E.K., and D.B. contributed to the data analysis and interpretation of model results. R.L., I.B., E.K., D.B., and S.N. provided scientific oversight and supervision throughout the study implementation. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and the figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kleanthis Avramidis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Supplementary Table 7 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avramidis, K., Jeong, W., Kommineni, A. et al. Deep learning characterizes depression and suicidal ideation in young adults from eye movements. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02550-4

Download citation

  • Received: 16 May 2025

  • Accepted: 05 March 2026

  • Published: 28 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02550-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics