Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Possible negative consequences of a wildlife trade ban

Nature Sustainability volume 4, pages 5–6 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

The COVID-19 outbreak has stimulated calls for a global wildlife trade ban. Such actions may only partially curb pandemic risk while negatively affecting people who depend on wildlife. More worryingly, they may provide cover for inaction on issues that would make a true difference in preventing future pandemics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Zhang, L. & Yin, F. Biodivers. Conserv. 23, 2371–2381 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Virus pushes China’s poor rat meat farmers to brink of despair. Bloomberg News (14 March 2020); https://go.nature.com/2W9PKZE

  3. National Forestry and Grassland Administration Zhongguo Linye Tongji Nianjian 2016 (China Forestry Statistical Yearbook 2016) (China Forestry Publishing House, 2017).

  4. The National People’s Congress of The People’s Republic of China Decision on Comprehensive Ban on Illegal Wildlife Trade; Eliminate (the bad habit) of Eating Wildlife (in order to) Ensure Public Health and Safety (The National People’s Congress of The People’s Republic of China, accessed 17 July 2020); https://go.nature.com/3agU1Cy

  5. Ping, X. & Zeng, Y. Sci. Sin. Vitae 50, 33–43 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Y. Hunan creates first plan to pay wildlife breeders. China Daily (19 May 2020); https://go.nature.com/3gIZaVr.

  7. Tang, A., Chen, Y. & Walsh, M. China’s epidemic-inspired wildlife ban has had big economic costs. Caixin (13 August 2020); https://go.nature.com/37gNl5L.

  8. Bonwitt, J. et al. Soc. Sci. Med. 200, 166–173 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coad, L. et al. Towards a Sustainable, Participatory and Inclusive Wild Meat Sector (Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), 2019).

  10. Booker, F. Why Eat Wild Meat? (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2019); https://go.nature.com/2K5NYGi

  11. Ritchie, R. Meat and Dairy Production (Our World in Data, accessed 25 October 2020); https://go.nature.com/3nlBatV

  12. Consumption Patterns of Wild Protein in North America (Wild Harvest Initiative, 2016); https://go.nature.com/37WtqYU

  13. Karesh, W. et al. Lancet 380, 1936–1945 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Marco, M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3888–3892 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Living Planet Report 2020 - Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (WWF, 2020).

  16. Global Biodiversity Outlook 5 (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020).

  17. Johnson, C. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20192736 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hing, S. et al. Wildl. Res. 43, 51–60 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Special Report on Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (IPCC, 2019).

  20. Willet, W. et al. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK

    Dilys Roe

  2. Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group, International Union for the Conservation of Nature https://www.iucn.org/

    Dilys Roe

  3. School of Life Sciences and School of Ecology, State Key Lab of Biological Control, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Tien Ming Lee

Authors
  1. Dilys Roe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tien Ming Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dilys Roe or Tien Ming Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Sustainability thanks Hongxin Wang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roe, D., Lee, T.M. Possible negative consequences of a wildlife trade ban. Nat Sustain 4, 5–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00676-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00676-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene