Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The potential of implementing superblocks for multifunctional street use in cities

Abstract

The Barcelona superblock has been proposed as a sustainable urban neighbourhood transformation strategy in cities. Superblock design reduces space assigned to cars to enable alternative uses for improving liveability and sustainability. Here, the potential for superblock transformation is systematically quantified and evaluated for cities with varying urban forms and densities. A superblock consists of nine (3 × 3) urban city blocks, including interior and exterior streets. Miniblocks, consisting of four (2 × 2) blocks, are proposed as a less-disruptive strategy to initiate urban transformation on which superblocks can build. A geospatial network-based approach is developed to find locations for introducing multifunctional streets. For possible site prioritization, the identified locations are evaluated concerning the potential disruption to traffic. The analysis reveals that the potential for superblocks and miniblocks, as well as their disruption effect, varies considerably across cities and is affected by the urban layout. For some cities, over 40% of the street network is potentially suitable for integrating superblock or miniblock design, providing opportunities for city-scale transition towards more sustainable and liveable cities. A grid-like layout in cities is not a sufficient condition for high superblock potential, and cities with irregular street layouts can show high transformation potential as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of superblock design.
Fig. 2: The relative street network length classified as superblocks or miniblocks is modelled for different f values for each case-study city.
Fig. 3: Modelled classification of the street network for selected cities.
Fig. 4: Comparison of the modelled absolute and relative street types for the case-study cities.
Fig. 5: Absolute and relative lengths of all street networks modelled as either superblocks or miniblocks.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The classified streets, including calculated NDI values and all simulated superblocks and miniblocks for the geometric scenario G1, are available for download as shapefiles or GeoJSON files: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4562462.

Code availability

The workflows and code used are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Rosenzweig, C. W. et al. Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network (Urban Climate Change Reserach Network, 2015).

  2. Pozoukidou, G. & Chatziyiannaki, Z. 15‐minute city: decomposing the new urban planning eutopia. Sustainability 13, 928 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Willsher, K. Paris agrees to turn Champs-Élysées into ‘extraordinary garden’. The Guardian (10 January 2021).

  4. Laker, L. Milan announces ambitious scheme to reduce car use after lockdown. The Guardian (21 April 2020).

  5. Burgen, S. Two-way street: how Barcelona is democratising public space. The Guardian (23 December 2020).

  6. Stavroulaki, I. & Pont, M. B. A systematic review of the scientific literature on the theme of multi-functional streets. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 588, 052406 (2020).

  7. Lydon, M., Garcia, T., Flynn, J. & Norheim, J. S. Tactical Urbanism—Guide to Materials v1.0 (Street Plans Collaborative, 2016).

  8. A New Strategy of Sustainable Neighbourhood Planning: Five Principles Discussion Note 3 (UN Habitat, 2015).

  9. Khreis, H., Van Nunen, E., Mueller, N., Zandieh, R. & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. Commentary: how to create healthy environments in cities. Epidemiology 28, 60–62 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Engel-Yan, J., Kennedy, C., Saiz, S. & Pressnail, K. Toward sustainable neighbourhoods: the need to consider infrastructure interactions. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 32, 45–57 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Superilla Barcelona (Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2021); https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/superilles/en/

  12. Palenzuela, S. R. in International Encyclopedia of Transportation (ed. Vickerman, R.) 249–257 (Elsevier, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10709-2

  13. Rueda, S. in Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning (eds Nieuwenhuijsen, M. & Khreis, H.) 135–153 (Springer, 2019).

  14. Zografos, C., Klause, K. A., Connolly, J. J. T. & Anguelovski, I. The everyday politics of urban transformational adaptation: struggles for authority and the Barcelona superblock project. Cities 99, 102613 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan of Barcelona (2013–2018) (BCN Ecologia, 2014).

  16. Barcelona Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2020 (Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2013).

  17. Scudellari, J., Staricco, L. & Vitale Brovarone, E. Implementing the Supermanzana approach in Barcelona. Critical issues at local and urban level. J. Urban Des. 25, 675–696 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mueller, N. et al. Changing the urban design of cities for health: the superblock model. Environ. Int. 134, 105132 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frey, H. et al. SUPERBE (Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie, 2020).

  20. Liang, C. Shaping a Good Superblock Neighbourhood in Transcona, Winnipeg https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/handle/1993/24039 (2014).

  21. Spain: EIB to Provide €95 Million to Finance 40 Climate Action Projects in Barcelona (European Investment Bank, 2020); https://www.eib.org/en/press/all/2020-215-eib-to-provide-eur95-million-to-finance-40-climate-action-projects-in-barcelona

  22. Tarbatt, J. & Tarbatt, C. S. The Urban Block (RIBA, 2020); https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021193

  23. Chen, F. & Thwaites, K. Chinese Urban Design (Routledge, 2016); https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315571799

  24. Scoppa, M., Bawazir, K. & Alawadi, K. Straddling boundaries in superblock cities. Assessing local and global network connectivity using cases from Abu Dhabi, UAE. Transp. Res. Part A 130, 770–782 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Berghauser Pont, M. et al. The spatial distribution and frequency of street, plot and building types across five European cities. Environ. Plan. B 46, 1226–1242 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bobkova, E., Berghauser Pont, M. & Marcus, L. Towards analytical typologies of plot systems: quantitative profile of five European cities. Environ. Plan. B https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319880902 (2019).

  27. Marshall, S. Streets & Patterns (Spon Press, 2005); https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203589397

  28. Scoppa, M., Bawazir, K. & Alawadi, K. Walking the superblocks: street layout efficiency and the sikkak system in Abu Dhabi. Sustain. Cities Soc. 38, 359–369 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gajer, S. Deconstructing the Superblock: Universal Solutions vs Cultural Specificity in Chinese Urban Planning (Carleton Univ., 2015).

  30. Feng, C. & Peponis, J. The definition of syntactic types: the generation, analysis, and sorting of universes of superblock designs. Environ. Plan. B 47, 1031–1046 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kan, H. Y., Forsyth, A. & Rowe, P. Redesigning China’s superblock neighbourhoods: policies, opportunities and challenges. J. Urban Des. 22, 757–777 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stupar, A., Jovanović, P. & Vojvodić, J. I. Strengthening the social sustainability of super-blocks: Belgrade’s emerging urban hubs. Sustainability 12, 903 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moosavi, V. Urban morphology meets deep learning: Exploring urban forms in one million cities, town and villages across the planet. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02939 (2017).

  34. Roberts, D. Superblocks. Barcelona’s Plan to Free Itself from Cars (Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, 2019).

  35. Melia, S., Parkhurst, G. & Barton, H. The paradox of intensification. Transp. Policy 18, 46–52 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meerow, S. A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 125011 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ge, X. & Han, D. Sustainability-oriented configurational analysis of the street network of China’s superblocks: beyond Marshall’s model. Front. Archit. Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.07.001 (2020).

  38. Foody, G. et al. Mapping and the Citizen Sensor (Ubiquity Press, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5334/bbf.a

  39. Maheshwari, T. An Urban Design Response to the Technological Shift in Transportation (ETH Zürich, 2020).

  40. Han, B., Sun, D., Yu, X., Song, W. & Ding, L. Classification of urban street networks based on tree-like network features. Sustainability 12, 628 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Boeing, G. D. Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form. (University of California, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moore, E. J., Kichainukon, W. & Phalavonk, U. Maximum flow in road networks with speed-dependent capacities—application to Bangkok traffic. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 35, 489–499 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rajalakshmi, V. & Vaidyanathan, S. G. in Progress in Advanced Computing and Intelligent Engineering Vol. 2 (eds Panigrahi, C. R. et al.) 577–583 (Springer, 2019).

  44. Loder, A., Ambühl, L., Menendez, M. & Axhausen, K. W. Understanding traffic capacity of urban networks. Sci. Rep. 9, 16283 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kelbaugh, D. The Urban Fix: Resilient Cities in the War Against Climate Change, Heat Islands and Overpopulation (Taylor & Francis, 2019); https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429057441

  46. Pettorelli, N., Durant, S. M. & du Toit, J. T. Rewilding (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560962

  47. Vitale Brovarone, E., Scudellari, J. & Staricco, L. Planning the transition to autonomous driving: a policy pathway towards urban liveability. Cities 108, 102996 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gerten, C., Fina, S. & Rusche, K. The sprawling planet: simplifying the measurement of global urbanization trends. Front. Environ. Sci. 7, 00140 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fleming, S. Sweden says goodbye to parking spaces, hello to meeting places (World Economic Forum, 2021); https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/02/sweden-local-parking-community

  50. Boeing, G. Spatial information and the legibility of urban form: big data in urban morphology. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 56, 102013 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Overpass API http://overpass-api.de (2021).

  52. Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A. & Swart, P. J. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In Proc. 7th Python Sci. Conf. (SciPy 2008) (eds Varoquaux, G. et al.) http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_2/ (2008).

  53. Gillies, S. et al. Shapely: Manipulation and Analysis of Geometric Objects v.1.1 https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/latest/manual.html (2020).

  54. High Resolution Population Density Maps (Meta, 2021); https://dataforgood.facebook.com

  55. Lustenberger, P., Schumacher, F., Spada, M., Burgherr, P. & Stojadinovic, B. Assessing the performance of the European natural gas network for selected supply disruption scenarios using open-source information. Energies 12, 4685 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Skiena, S. S. The Algorithm Design Manual (Springer, 2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-070-4

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under the project grant 196070 (S.E.). R. Mutschler and F. Khayatian are acknowledged for providing early feedback and K. Orehounig for providing the supportive research context and computation hardware. Map data are copyrighted by OpenStreetMap and available from https://openstreetmap.org.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author confirms sole responsibility for the entire study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Eggimann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Isabelle Anguelovski, Chen Feng and Johannes Müller for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary materials.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eggimann, S. The potential of implementing superblocks for multifunctional street use in cities. Nat Sustain 5, 406–414 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00855-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00855-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene