Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A flexible skin-mounted haptic interface for multimodal cutaneous feedback

Abstract

Haptic feedback systems are a crucial technology for improving immersion in augmented and virtual reality applications, especially those requiring intricate finger motions. However, existing technologies are typically limited by rigid and bulky equipment that can degrade wearability while providing insufficiently nuanced tactile sensations. Here we report a lightweight and flexible finger-worn haptic device that provides controllable and nuanced cutaneous feedback. The device consists of four serpentine shape memory alloy structures in opposing pairs that manipulate a tactor, creating both individual and collective actuation patterns. In total, it can implement 11 distinctive motions for a variety of haptic sensations. In addition, because the device is composed of a soft three-dimensionally printed flexible finger cap structure and elastic cover, it can easily conform to human fingers, enhancing wearability and user comfort. We show that the haptic interface can be used in a variety of virtual and real-world activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Skin-mounted SMA haptic interface.
Fig. 2: Characterization of SSSA.
Fig. 3: Skin-mounted SMA finger haptic interface.
Fig. 4: Deployment of finger-mounted haptic interface in VR.
Fig. 5: Haptic interface for daily activities in a real-world application.
Fig. 6: Object detection application for visually impaired users.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The code for the haptics device demonstration is available via GitHub at https://github.com/ansue1234/SML_SMA_Haptics.

References

  1. Yang, T. et al. Recent advances and opportunities of active materials for haptic technologies in virtual and augmented reality. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008831 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang, Y. et al. Recent advances in multi-mode haptic feedback technologies towards wearable interfaces. Mater. Today Phys. 22, 100602 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, H. et al. Recent advances in wearable sensors and integrated functional devices for virtual and augmented reality applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2005692 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Culbertson, H., Schorr, S. B. & Okamura, A. M. Haptics: the present and future of artificial touch sensation. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 1, 385–409 (2018).

  5. Abiri, A. et al. Multi-modal haptic feedback for grip force reduction in robotic surgery. Sci. Rep. 9, 5016 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto, T., Abolhassani, N., Jung, S., Okamura, A. M. & Judkins, T. N. Augmented reality and haptic interfaces for robot‐assisted surgery. Int. J. Med. Robot. 8, 45–56 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozioko, O. & Dahiya, R. Smart tactile gloves for haptic interaction, communication, and rehabilitation. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4, 2100091 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Popescu, V. G., Burdea, G. C., Bouzit, M. & Hentz, V. R. A virtual-reality-based telerehabilitation system with force feedback. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 4, 45–51 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BD, R. et al. Retrospective assessment of smart watch haptic feedback to treat nightmares in the U.S. Military. J. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Disord. 07, 186–191 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Immonen, L. Haptics in Military Applications. Master's thesis, University of Tampere (2008).

  11. Sun, Z., Zhu, M., Shan, X. & Lee, C. Augmented tactile-perception and haptic-feedback rings as human-machine interfaces aiming for immersive interactions. Nat. Commun. 13, 5224 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, X. et al. Skin-integrated wireless haptic interfaces for virtual and augmented reality. Nature 575, 473–479 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ariza Nunez, O. J., Zenner, A., Steinicke, F., Daiber, F. & Krüger, A. Holitouch: conveying holistic touch illusions by combining pseudo-haptics with tactile and proprioceptive feedback during virtual interaction with 3DUIs. Front. Virtual Real. 3, 879845 (2022).

  14. Park, J., Kim, M., Lee, Y., Lee, H. S. & Ko, H. Fingertip skin–inspired microstructured ferroelectric skins discriminate static/dynamic pressure and temperature stimuli. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500661 (2015).

  15. Raza, A., Hassan, W. & Jeon, S. Pneumatically controlled wearable tactile actuator for multi-modal haptic feedback. IEEE Access 12, 59485–59499 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonar, H. A., Huang, J.-L. & Paik, J. Soft touch using soft pneumatic actuator–skin as a wearable haptic feedback device. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3, 2000168 (2021).

  17. Garcia, P., Giraud, F., Lemaire-Semail, B., Rupin, M. & Kaci, A. Control of an ultrasonic haptic interface for button simulation. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 342, 113624 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghenna, S. et al. Enhancing variable friction tactile display using an ultrasonic travelling wave. IEEE Trans. Haptics 10, 296–301 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leroy, E., Hinchet, R. & Shea, H. Multimode hydraulically amplified electrostatic actuators for wearable haptics. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002564 (2020).

  20. Zhu, M., Do, T. N., Hawkes, E. & Visell, Y. Fluidic fabric muscle sheets for wearable and soft robotics. Soft Robot. 7, 179–197 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizzo, R., Sgambelluri, N., Scilingo, E. P., Raugi, M. & Bicchi, A. Electromagnetic modeling and design of haptic interface prototypes based on magnetorheological fluids. IEEE Trans. Magn. 43, 3586–3600 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, J., Hinchet, R., Shea, H. & Majidi, C. Wearable soft technologies for haptic sensing and feedback. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2007428 (2021).

  23. Zhao, H. et al. A wearable soft haptic communicator based on dielectric elastomer actuators. Soft Robot. 7, 451–461 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, Y. et al. A skin-integrated multimodal haptic interface for immersive tactile feedback. Nat. Electron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-023-01074-z (2023).

  25. Ankit, A. et al. Soft actuator materials for electrically driven haptic interfaces. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4, 2100061 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jadhav, S., Kannanda, V., Kang, B., Tolley, M. T. & Schulze, J. P. Soft robotic glove for kinesthetic haptic feedback in virtual reality environments. Electron. Imaging 29, 19–24 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo, Y. et al. Adaptive tactile interaction transfer via digitally embroidered smart gloves. Nat. Commun. 15, 868 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sonar, H. A., Gerratt, A. P., Lacour, S. P. & Paik, J. Closed-loop haptic feedback control using a self-sensing soft pneumatic actuator skin. Soft Robot. 7, 22–29 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oh, S. et al. Easy‐to‐wear Auxetic SMA knot‐architecture for spatiotemporal and multimodal haptic feedbacks. Adv. Mater. 35, 2304442 (2023).

  30. Ji, X. et al. Untethered feel‐through haptics using 18‐μm thick dielectric elastomer actuators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2006639 (2021).

  31. Jung, Y. H. et al. A wireless haptic interface for programmable patterns of touch across large areas of the skin. Nat. Electron. 5, 374–385 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao, K. et al. Encoding of tactile information in hand via skin-integrated wireless haptic interface. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 893–903 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, S., Chen, Y., Yang, J., Han, T. & Yao, S. Skin-integrated stretchable actuators toward skin-compatible haptic feedback and closed-loop human-machine interactions. Npj Flex. Electron. 7, 1 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu, M. et al. Haptic-feedback smart glove as a creative human-machine interface (HMI) for virtual/augmented reality applications. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8693 (2020).

  35. Hinchet, R. & Shea, H. High force density textile electrostatic clutch. Adv. Mater. Technol. 5, 1900895 (2020).

  36. Preechayasomboon, P. & Rombokas, E. Haplets: finger-worn wireless and low-encumbrance vibrotactile haptic feedback for virtual and augmented reality. Front. Virtual Real. 2, 738613 (2021).

  37. Giraud, F. H., Joshi, S. & Paik, J. Haptigami: a fingertip haptic interface with vibrotactile and 3-DoF cutaneous force feedback. IEEE Trans. Haptics 15, 131–141 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tzemanaki, A., Al, G. A., Melhuish, C. & Dogramadzi, S. Design of a wearable fingertip haptic device for remote palpation: characterisation and interface with a virtual environment. Front. Robot. AI 5, 62 (2018).

  39. Tan, S., Klatzky, R. L., Peshkin, M. A. & Edward Colgate, J. PixeLite: a thin and wearable high bandwidth electroadhesive haptic array. IEEE Trans. Haptics 16, 555–560 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schorr, S. B. & Okamura, A. M. Three-dimensional skin deformation as force substitution: wearable device design and performance during haptic exploration of virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Haptics https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2017.2672969 (2017).

  41. Kaczmarek, K. A., Webster, J. G., Bach-y-Rita, P. & Tompkins, W. J. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38, 1–16 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ozioko, O., Navaraj, W., Hersh, M. & Dahiya, R. Tacsac: a wearable haptic device with capacitive touch-sensing capability for tactile display. Sensors 20, 4780 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ham, H. et al. Teleoperation of soft robots with real‐time fingertip haptic feedback using small batteries. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8, 2300070 (2023).

  44. Frediani, G. & Carpi, F. Tactile display of softness on fingertip. Sci. Rep. 10, 20491 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Frediani, G., Mazzei, D., De Rossi, D. E. & Carpi, F. Wearable wireless tactile display for virtual interactions with soft bodies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2, 31 (2014).

  46. Chen, S. et al. Multimodal 5‐DOF stretchable electromagnetic actuators toward haptic information delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2314515 (2024).

  47. Li, X., Lu, C., Song, Z., Ding, W. & Zhang, X.-P. Planar magnetic actuation for soft and rigid robots using a scalable electromagnet array. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7, 9264–9270 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Huang, X. et al. Shape memory materials for electrically-powered soft machines. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 4539–4551 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kang, B., Lee, Y., Piao, T., Ding, Z. & Wang, W. D. Robotic soft swim bladder using liquid–vapor phase transition. Mater. Horiz. 8, 939–947 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, W. & Ahn, S.-H. Shape memory alloy-based soft gripper with variable stiffness for compliant and effective grasping. Soft Robot. 4, 379–389 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bergmann Tiest, W. M. & Kappers, A. M. L. Haptic perception of force. Scholarpedia 10, 32732 (2015).

  52. Baud-Bovy, G. & Gatti, E. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6192 (eds Kappers, A. M. L. et al.) 231–236 (Springer, 2010).

  53. Patel, D. K. et al. Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606000 (2017).

  54. Patterson, Z. J., Patel, D. K., Bergbreiter, S., Yao, L. & Majidi, C. A method for 3D printing and rapid prototyping of fieldable untethered soft robots. Soft Robot. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2022.0003 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by an ICWERX grant from DEFENSEWERX and the Intelligence Community. This research was also supported by the MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy) in Korea, under the Human Resource Development Program for Industrial Innovation (Global) (grant no. P0017306, Global Human Resource Development for Innovative Design in Robot and Engineering) supervised by the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT). The human subject study was approved by the Carnegie Mellon University IRB (STUDY2024_00000021) and not directly funded by the ICWERX grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.K. and C.M. conceived the initial concept. B.K., N.Z., D.K.P. and G.N.S. conceived the application context. B.K., C.M., D.K.P. and N.Z. wrote the manuscript. B.K. performed fabrication of the device. B.K. and D.K.P. performed the characterization of the device. B.K. and D.K.P. created the videos. C.M. supervised the project and provided scientific and experimental advice. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmel Majidi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Electronics thanks Herbert Shea, Zhongda Sun and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Discussion, including Supplementary Figs. 1–17.

Supplementary Video 1 (download MP4 )

Overview of haptic interface.

Supplementary Video 2 (download MP4 )

Single-serpentine SMA actuator architecture.

Supplementary Video 3 (download MP4 )

Demonstration of actuator performance.

Supplementary Video 4 (download MP4 )

Cyclical actuation with varying frequencies.

Supplementary Video 5 (download MP4 )

Cyclical actuation in the diagonal direction.

Supplementary Video 6 (download MP4 )

Demonstration of actuation in the orthogonal direction.

Supplementary Video 7 (download MP4 )

Full demonstration of all actuator motions.

Supplementary Video 8 (download MP4 )

Demonstration of the wearability of the finger-mounted haptic interface.

Supplementary Video 9 (download MP4 )

VR demonstration showing various actuation modalities.

Supplementary Video 10 (download MP4 )

Sensory assistance for placing a painting on a wall.

Supplementary Video 11 (download MP4 )

Demonstration of object detection.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, B., Zavanelli, N., Sue, G.N. et al. A flexible skin-mounted haptic interface for multimodal cutaneous feedback. Nat Electron 8, 818–830 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-025-01443-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-025-01443-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing