Table 1 Figures of merit for the standard cell classification.

From: Rapid detection of microbiota cell type diversity using machine-learned classification of flow cytometry data

Standard			Percentage (Mean ± st dev)^a
abbreviation	Full name	remark	Recall^b	Precision^b	Correct predicted classification in LW^c
B02	Beads 0.2 µm		98.3 ± 0.1	99.0 ± 0.1	98.5 ± 0.5
B05	Beads 0.5 µm		99.4 ± 0.1	98.7 ± 0.1	99.3 ± 0.5
B1	Beads 1 µm		99.8 ± 0.1	99.6 ± 0.1	99.8 ± 0.3
B2	Beads 2 µm		99.4 ± 0.2	99.6 ± 0.2	99.3 ± 0.3
B4	Beads 4 µm		96.3 ± 0.3	97.8 ± 0.5	96.3 ± 0.5
B6	Beads 6 µm		98.1 ± 0.4	96.5 ± 0.3	97.6 ± 0.6
B10	Beads 10 µm		98.8 ± 0.3	99.8 ± 0.1	99.1 ± 0.3
B15	Beads 15 µm		99.8 ± 0.0	98.9 ± 0.3	99.7 ± 0.2
AJH1	Acinetobacter johnsonii	subpop 1	88.7 ± 0.6	79.2 ± 0.5	88.5 ± 1.7
AJH2		subpop 2	90.9 ± 1.0	77.9 ± 0.8	90.7 ± 2.0
ATJ1	Acinetobacter tjernbergiae	subpop 1	56.2 ± 2.1	47.0 ± 1.0	57.9 ± 0.9
ATJ2		subpop 2	58.8 ± 3.8	59.5 ± 2.7	59.1 ± 0.5
ACH1	Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus	subpop 1	72.7 ± 1.1	56.8 ± 0.8	74.8 ± 0.7
ACH2		subpop 2	63.4 ± 1.3	66.1 ± 1.9	63.5 ± 2.4
ACH3		subpop 3	78.2 ± 0.9	70.6 ± 2.4	74.1 ± 3.2
BST1	Bacillus subtilis	subpop 1	97.8 ± 0.3	95.7 ± 4.3	92.9 ± 0.2
BST2		subpop 2	80.8 ± 0.9	76.6 ± 1.1	81.2 ± 1.4
CCR1	Caulobacter crescentus	subpop 1	54.0 ± 2.0	62.0 ± 1.9	53.2 ± 0.1
CCR2		subpop 2	79.5 ± 1.9	83.1 ± 1.2	78.3 ± 4.7
CAL	Cryptococcus albidus		99.9 ± 0.0	99.8 ± 0.1	99.8 ± 2.0
MG_EXP3	Escherichia coli MG1655	exponential phase	88.2 ± 0.6	87.5 ± 1.1	87.8 ± 0.5
MG_STAT_LB		stationary phase LB	89.3 ± 1.0	90.0 ± 0.7	88.7 ± 1.3
MG_STAT_MM		stat phase M9-CAA	97.4 ± 0.8	96.7 ± 0.8	97.7 ± 1.8
DH_STAT_LB	Escherichia coli DH5α-λpir		73.0 ± 0.9	83.5 ± 1.1	72.6 ± 0.6
LLC	Lactococcus lactis		34.0 ± 3.3	49.9 ± 3.0	34.8 ± 1.8
PKM1	Pseudomonas knackmussii		94.0 ± 0.8	87.7 ± 0.7	93.6 ± 1.1
PMG	Pseudomonas migulae		32.9 ± 2.8	39.5 ± 3.9	32.6 ± 3.1
PPT	Pseudomonas putida		27.3 ± 4.0	38.2 ± 3.4	27.5 ± 3.5
PVR1	Pseudomonas veronii	subpop 1	73.9 ± 0.7	77.2 ± 1.9	74.3 ± 4.9
PVR2		subpop 2	96.7 ± 0.7	96.7 ± 0.7	96.8 ± 0.7
SWT	Sphingomonas wittichii		44.1 ± 1.5	52.7 ± 3.4	44.4 ± 1.5
SYN	Sphingomonas yanoikuyae		66.6 ± 1.2	55.6 ± 1.0	65.0 ± 2.2

^aCalculated from the five independently built ANN classifiers.
^bSee Supplementary Notes for terminology.
^cMean percentage ± one SD of each individual standard (n = 5000 subsampled cells) in silico mixed to a background of a lake water microbial community (n = 5039), attributed to its own class.

Back to article page

Table 1 Figures of merit for the standard cell classification.

Search

Quick links