Fig. 3: Traditional vs eDNA biodiversity similarity across landuse types. | Communications Biology

Fig. 3: Traditional vs eDNA biodiversity similarity across landuse types.

From: Environmental DNA provides higher resolution assessment of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem function via spatio-temporal nestedness and turnover partitioning

Fig. 3

Venn diagrams showing the proportion of genera detected for each sampling method (eDNA = blue, traditional = orange) across each landuse type. Sample sizes were 56 for eDNA (average of each sites’ 3 replicate samping) and 56 for traditional sampling.

Back to article page