Fig. 1: Social brain variation is preferentially explained by social traits in women, and by personality and demographic traits in men. | Communications Biology

Fig. 1: Social brain variation is preferentially explained by social traits in women, and by personality and demographic traits in men.

From: Dissecting the midlife crisis: disentangling social, personality and demographic determinants in social brain anatomy

Fig. 1

Extending previous social neuroscience studies, the richness of the UK Biobank resource allowed uniquely isolating marginal correlations, which prevail over a wide variety of competing explanatory factors. A generative probabilistic model was estimated for each of the 36 social brain regions in our population sample of middle-aged adults. These region-by-region analyses revealed numerous dominant specific (i.e., partial) trait associations in social brain structure. Colors indicate which individual traits have the largest magnitude (i.e., strongest positive or negative association) in explaining its regional gray matter volume, relative to the other 39 out of 40 total examined traits (cf. Supplementary Data 1). Red indicates markers in the social trait category, purple indicates the personality trait category, and blue indicates the demographic trait category. Sharing one’s home with other individuals was the single most frequent trait association to show the largest magnitude in explaining social brain volume for women, in atlas regions including the AI, AM, HC, IFG TPJ and pSTS (left). The personality trait of being a morning person was the most common trait to show the strongest trait association in social brain structure for men, in atlas regions including the AI, HC, FP, IFG, PCC and pMCC (right). Dominant trait associations from the partial correlation analysis are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1 (cf. Table 3 and Supplementary Data 2 for a description of the social brain region abbreviations).

Back to article page