Fig. 6: Target repetition analysis. | Communications Biology

Fig. 6: Target repetition analysis.

From: Attention expedites target selection by prioritizing the neural processing of distractor features

Fig. 6

a Trials in which the probe contained the DC, or the PC were sorted according to whether the color of the previous target was repeated (stronger priming-driven color bias for the PC), or switched (weaker priming-driven color bias for the PC). Here exemplarily shown for trials of an attend red/green block and a red target. Difference waveforms (minus non-target) for PC (black) and DC (gray) probes for repeat (b) and switch (c) trials, signal averaged across participants (n = 22). Rectangles indicate previously determined time ranges of early and late color biasing. A stronger priming-driven bias for the PC (repeat trials) entailed a pronounced early modulation for the DC (p = 0.0130), which was much smaller and not statistically significant on switch trials (p = 0.2761). Corroborating the response time split (see Fig. 5), a strong early processing of the DC was followed by its weaker selection in the late GFBA time range and linked to faster target identification. Stars indicate significant mean amplitude modulations in the indicated time ranges (p < 0.05), the late GFBA response for DC under switch conditions (c, gray line) was only significant when considering a shorter time window (i.e., from 167 to 210 ms).

Back to article page