Fig. 2: AUC representing total cumulative lifespan, and growth curve reshaping in TBR1Δa strain versus the parental TBR1 strain. | Communications Biology

Fig. 2: AUC representing total cumulative lifespan, and growth curve reshaping in TBR1Δa strain versus the parental TBR1 strain.

From: Drug-dependent growth curve reshaping reveals mechanisms of antifungal resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Fig. 2

ad Drug-dependent shrinkage of the shaded area under growth curves (OD600) upon exposure to (a) hydrogen peroxide, H2O2; (b) amphotericin B, AmB; (c) caspofungin, CASP; and (d) fluconazole, FLC. Here, the representative replicates are shown. For all replicates, see Supplementary Fig. 7a–d. e Area under each growth curve (AUC) above starting population size, approximated by numerical integration via the trapezoid method with equally spaced 1-h intervals. Red circles represent individual data points. Error bars represent means and standard deviations calculated from AUC of three biological replicates. f Growth curve analysis by piecewise linear fits to ln(OD600) versus time is exemplified by TBR1Δa in normal (N) and 0.8 μg/ml AmB drug-containing (D) medium. The circles and letters next to them (B1, B2, B3) indicate breakpoints identified by the piecewise linear fitting within each growth curve. The breakpoints divide the N curve into 2, and the D curve – into 4 phases: pregrowth, adaptation, regrowth, and stationary phase. To characterize growth curve reshaping, the slope (S) and duration (T) of each growth phase (Supplementary Fig. 7e–h) were calculated for all drug concentrations.

Back to article page