Table 4 Prediction results of different methods on three constructed independent test datasets.
From: Protein–protein interaction and non-interaction predictions using gene sequence natural vector
Method | Acc. (%) | Pre. (%) | Sen. (%) | MCC (%) | F-score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. cerevisiae | |||||
Natural vector difference | 78.43 | 83.80 | 70.49 | 57.60 | 76.57 |
Codon frequency difference | 91.90 | 90.38 | 93.78 | 83.86 | 92.05 |
our method (SVM-NVDT) | 99.20 | 99.35 | 99.03 | 98.39 | 99.19 |
D. melanogaster | |||||
Natural vector difference | 79.78 | 84.87 | 72.47 | 60.20 | 78.18 |
Codon frequency difference | 89.04 | 89.71 | 88.20 | 78.10 | 88.95 |
our method (SVM-NVDT) | 94.94 | 97.62 | 92.13 | 90.03 | 94.80 |
H. Pylori | |||||
Natural vector difference | 71.60 | 71.18 | 71.19 | 43.21 | 71.49 |
Codon frequency difference | 72.84 | 79.37 | 61.73 | 46.85 | 69.44 |
our method (SVM-NVDT) | 98.56 | 98.36 | 98.77 | 97.12 | 98.56 |
