Table 1 Summary statistics across the four river regions.

From: Fragmentation by major dams and implications for the future viability of platypus populations

Region

River/Creek

Survey section (km)

Sample size

Proxy of abundance

Allelic richness

Ho

SE

He

SE

FIS

SE

Upper Murray Rivers

Ovens

36

19

27

1.375

0.144

0.003

0.145

0.003

0.005

0.004

Mitta-Mitta above dam

23

13

19

1.370

0.140

0.003

0.143

0.003

0.013

0.005

Mitta-Mitta below dam

18

4

4

1.395

0.152

0.003

0.153

0.003

−0.019

0.009

Snowy Rivers

Snowy

26

56

46

1.365

0.139

0.002

0.141

0.002

0.010

0.002

Thredbo

33

19

37

1.365

0.141

0.003

0.141

0.003

−0.003

0.004

Eucumbene above dam

18

4

36

1.370

0.144

0.003

0.143

0.003

−0.026

0.009

Eucumbene below dam

20

20

50

1.346

0.137

0.003

0.136

0.003

−0.001

0.004

Central NSW Rivers

Wingecarribee*

7

42

**

4.113

0.703

0.060

0.731

0.044

0.053

0.047

Nepean above dam*

0.5

11

**

3.942

0.549

0.063

0.646

0.064

0.142

0.051

Nepean below dam*

4

7

**

4.706

0.589

0.095

0.608

0.059

0.096

0.107

Border Rivers

Tenterfield

96

39

207

1.353

0.135

0.003

0.138

0.003

0.015

0.003

Severn above dam

50

23

115

1.335

0.133

0.003

0.133

0.003

−0.003

0.004

Severn below dam

60

17

83

1.333

0.130

0.003

0.131

0.003

0.005

0.005

  1. The number of samples and a proxy of abundance calculated as (unique number of captures/number of sampling nights) × (length of the river surveyed) based on Hawke et al.21; Ho—observed heterozygosity; He—expected Hardy-Weinberg heterozygosity; FIS—inbreeding coefficient.
  2. Note that small sample sizes in Mitta-Mitta below the dam and Eucumbene above the dam (both 4 individuals) are likely to result in unreliable estimates of diversity.
  3. SE standard error, NSW New South Wales.
  4. *Microsatellite data.
  5. **Comparable estimates are not available due to different survey techniques see Kolomyjec et al.31,53,55.