Table 1 dLDS performance in terms of R2
Model type | Protocol | Worm number | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
Per-worm | Stim | 1 | 0.86 |
2 | 0.78 | ||
3 | 0.83 | ||
4 | 0.79 | ||
5 | 0.79 | ||
6 | 0.81 | ||
7 | 0.7 | ||
Aligned | Stim | 1 | 0.87 |
2 | 0.84 | ||
3 | 0.85 | ||
4 | 0.82 | ||
5 | 0.75 | ||
6 | 0.8 | ||
7 | 0.83 | ||
Per-worm | NoStim | 1 | 0.85 |
2 | 0.86 | ||
3 | 0.81 | ||
4 | 0.85 | ||
5 | 0.77 |
Model type | Protocol | Worm number | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
Per-worm | Stim | 1 | 0.86 |
2 | 0.78 | ||
3 | 0.83 | ||
4 | 0.79 | ||
5 | 0.79 | ||
6 | 0.81 | ||
7 | 0.7 | ||
Aligned | Stim | 1 | 0.87 |
2 | 0.84 | ||
3 | 0.85 | ||
4 | 0.82 | ||
5 | 0.75 | ||
6 | 0.8 | ||
7 | 0.83 | ||
Per-worm | NoStim | 1 | 0.85 |
2 | 0.86 | ||
3 | 0.81 | ||
4 | 0.85 | ||
5 | 0.77 |