Table 2 Experimental results reveal an optimization tradeoff between trackable diffusion rates and localization error for MFX-enabled single particle tracking
From: Parameter optimization for MINFLUX microscopy enabled single particle tracking
\({{\rm{S}}}\) | PL | DMP | \({{{\rm{t}}}}_{{{\rm{dwell}}}}\) | \({{{\rm{D}}}}_{{{\rm{eMSD}}}}\) \([{{\rm{\mu }}}{{{\rm{m}}}}^{2}/{{\rm{s}}}]\) | \({{{\rm{\sigma }}}}_{{{\rm{eMSD}}}}\) \(\left[{{\rm{nm}}}\right]\) | \({{{\rm{\sigma }}}}_{{{\rm{CRLB}}}}\) \([{{\rm{nm}}}]\) | \(\left\langle {{\rm{\eta }}}\right\rangle\) | \(\left\langle {{{\rm{t}}}}_{{{\rm{loc}}}}\right\rangle\) \([{{\rm{\mu }}}{{\rm{s}}}]\) | \(\frac{\left\langle {{\rm{N}}}\right\rangle }{\left\langle {{\rm{\eta }}}\right\rangle {{{\rm{N}}}}_{{{\rm{PL}}}}}\) | \({{\rm{n}}}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 10 | 0 | 100 | 2.46 | 30.30 | 20.03 | 1 | 150 | 2.13 | 855 |
II | 10 | 5 | 100 | 0.07 | 16.52 | 20.03 | 1 | 150 | 4.10 | 924 |
II | 10 | 2 | 100 | 0.49 | 15.53 | 20.03 | 1 | 150 | 4.49 | 988 |
II | 10 | 0 | 100 | 0.63 | 28.02 | 20.03 | 1 | 150 | 3.36 | 1075 |
II | 10 | 0 | 100 | 0.63 | 27.96 | 20.03 | 1 | 150 | 3.36 | 1061 |
II | 20 | 0 | 100 | 0.52 | 22.78 | 14.35 | 1 | 151 | 2.27 | 841 |
II | 50 | 0 | 100 | 0.48 | 14.05 | 9.08 | 2 | 282 | 0.71 | 534 |
III | 10 | 0 | 100 | 0.46 | 30.37 | 20.03 | 1 | 150 | 1.53 | 576 |
III | 20 | 0 | 100 | 0.36 | 23.51 | 14.35 | 2 | 281 | 0.67 | 325 |
III | 50 | 0 | 100 | 0.23 | 13.46 | 9.08 | 5 | 676 | 0.22 | 323 |
II | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0.28 | 4.67 | 9.08 | 5 | 437 | 0.23 | 779 |
II | 50 | 0 | 100 | 0.28 | 5.50 | 9.08 | 3 | 414 | 0.42 | 763 |
II | 50 | 0 | 200 | 0.21 | 10.91 | 9.08 | 2 | 483 | 0.82 | 564 |
II | TIRF SPT | 0.64 | 39.86 | - | 1 | 14925 | - | 1810 | ||