Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
PCBP1 binding to single-stranded poly-cytosine motifs enhances cGAS sensing and impairs breast cancer development
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 January 2026

PCBP1 binding to single-stranded poly-cytosine motifs enhances cGAS sensing and impairs breast cancer development

  • Cécile Fréreux  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-82451,
  • Joseph A. Q. Karam  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4536-73621,
  • Breege V. Howley  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-88801,
  • Bryan Granger  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-6663-37552,
  • Paramita Chakraborty3,
  • Silvia Vaena4,
  • Martin Romeo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7941-18624,
  • Annamarie C. Dalton  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-0798-415X1,
  • Bidyut K. Mohanty5,
  • Shikhar Mehrotra  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-95043 &
  • …
  • Philip H. Howe  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1358-13131,4 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1149 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Breast cancer
  • Cell signalling
  • DNA
  • Tumour-suppressor proteins

Abstract

The cGAS-STING pathway plays a central role in controlling tumor progression through nucleic acid sensing and type I Interferon production. Here, we identify Poly(rC) Binding Protein 1 as a tumor suppressor that amplifies cGAS-STING signaling in breast cancer. Using patient datasets and a transgenic mouse model with conditional PCBP1 knockout in mammary epithelial cells, we show that PCBP1 expression correlates with improved survival, reduced tumor burden, increased type I Interferon and Interferon Stimulated Gene expression, and elevated cytotoxic T cell infiltration. Mechanistically, PCBP1 binds cytosine-rich single-stranded motifs via its KH domains and increases cGAS affinity to these nucleic acids. Mutation of PCBP1’s conserved GXXG loops impairs nucleic acid binding and cGAS activation. Although cGAS is a double-stranded DNA sensor with no intrinsic sequence specificity, we uncover that the single-stranded nucleic-acid binding protein PCBP1 enhances cGAS sensing by engaging sequence-specific motifs, acting as a nucleic acid co-sensor that impairs tumorigenesis.

Similar content being viewed by others

PCBP2 maintains antiviral signaling homeostasis by regulating cGAS enzymatic activity via antagonizing its condensation

Article Open access 23 March 2022

Computational design of constitutively active cGAS

Article 02 January 2023

cGAS and cancer therapy: a double-edged sword

Article 18 January 2022

Data availability

Bulk and single nuclei RNA-sequencing datasets generated during this study are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession numbers GSE307616 and GSE307750, respectively. Source data are provided with this paper in the supplementary data. The TCGA BRCA dataset is available online at https://www.cancer.gov/tcga. The Tabula Muris dataset is available online at http://tabula-muris.sf.czbiohub.org. Unedited Western blot images are available in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Zhang, X. et al. The cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS forms an oligomeric complex with DNA and undergoes switch-like conformational changes in the activation loop. Cell Rep. 6, 421–430 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Civril, F. et al. Structural mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensing by cGAS. Nature 498, 332–337 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, X. et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is activated by double-stranded DNA-induced oligomerization. Immunity 39, 10.1016 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lu, C. et al. DNA sensing in mismatch repair-deficient tumor cells is essential for anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Cell 39, 96–108 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Härtlova, A. et al. DNa damage primes the type I interferon system via the cytosolic DNA sensor STING to promote anti-microbial innate immunity. Immunity 42, 332–343 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, J., Kim, H. S. & Chung, J. H. Molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial DNA release and activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 510–519 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X. & Chen, Z. J. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 339, 786–791 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, J. et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science 339, 826–830 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ablasser, A. et al. CGAS produces a 2′-5′-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING. Nature 498, 380–384 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hopfner, K. P. & Hornung, V. Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 501–521 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Motwani, M., Pesiridis, S. & Fitzgerald, K. A. DNA sensing by the cGAS–STING pathway in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 657–674 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka, Y. & Chen, Z. J. STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Sci. Signal. 5, ra20 (2012).

  13. Corrales, L. et al. Direct activation of STING in the tumor microenvironment leads to potent and systemic tumor regression and immunity. Cell Rep. 11, 1018–1030 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, H. et al. cGAS is essential for the antitumor effect of immune checkpoint blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Usa. 114, 1637–1642 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, T. et al. Antitumor activity of cGAMP via stimulation of cGAS-cGAMP-STING-IRF3 mediated innate immune response. Sci. Rep. 12, 19049 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vonderhaar, E. P. et al. STING activated tumor-intrinsic type I interferon signaling promotes CXCR3 dependent antitumor immunity in pancreatic cancer. CMGH 12, 41–58 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, T. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells equipped by IFNα empower T cells with potent anti-tumor immunity. Oncogene 41, 1866–1881 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mowat, C., Mosley, S. R., Namdar, A., Schiller, D. & Baker, K. Anti-tumor immunity in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers requires type I IFN–driven CCL5 and CXCL10. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20210108 (2021).

  19. Glück, S. et al. Innate immune sensing of cytosolic chromatin fragments through cGAS promotes senescence. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1061–1070 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, J. et al. STING inhibits the reactivation of dormant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 616, 806–813 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pathare, G. R. et al. Structural mechanism of cGAS inhibition by the nucleosome. Nature 587, 668–672 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cao, D., Han, X., Fan, X., Xu, R. M. & Zhang, X. Structural basis for nucleosome-mediated inhibition of cGAS activity. Cell Res. 30, 1088–1097 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kujirai, T. et al. Structural basis for the inhibition of cGAS by nucleosomes. Science 370, 455–458 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michalski, S. et al. Structural basis for sequestration and autoinhibition of cGAS by chromatin. Nature 587, 678–682 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xie, W. et al. Human cGAS catalytic domain has an additional DNA-binding interface that enhances enzymatic activity and liquid-phase condensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11946–11955 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Andreeva, L. et al. CGAS senses long and HMGB/TFAM-bound U-turn DNA by forming protein-DNA ladders. Nature 549, 394–398 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Luecke, S. et al. cGAS is activated by DNA in a length-dependent manner. EMBO Rep. 18, 1707–1715 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herzner, A. M. et al. Sequence-specific activation of the DNA sensor cGAS by Y-form DNA structures as found in primary HIV-1 cDNA. Nat. Immunol. 16, 1025–1033 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Du, Z. et al. Crystal structure of the first KH domain of human poly(C)-binding protein-2 in complex with a C-rich strand of human telomeric DNA at 1.7 Å. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 38823–38830 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Braddock, D. T., Baber, J. L., Levens, D. & Clore, G. M. Molecular basis of sequence-specific single-stranded DNA recognition by KH domains: Solution structure of a complex between hnRNP K KH3 and single-stranded DNA. EMBO J. 21, 3476–3485 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valverde, R., Edwards, L. & Regan, L. Structure and function of KH domains. FEBS J. 275, 2712–2726 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dickey, T. H., Altschuler, S. E. & Wuttke, D. S. Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins: multiple domains for multiple functions. Structure 21, 1074–1084 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chaudhury, A. et al. TGF-Β-mediated phosphorylation of hnRNP E1 induces EMT via transcript-selective translational induction of Dab2 and ILEI. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 286–293 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grelet, S. et al. A regulated PNUTS mRNA to lncRNA splice switch mediates EMT and tumour progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1105–1115 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tripathi, V. et al. Direct regulation of alternative splicing by SMAD3 through PCBP1 is essential to the tumor-promoting role of TGF-β. Mol. Cell 64, 549–564 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Howley, B. V. & Howe, P. H. TGF-beta signaling in cancer: post-transcriptional regulation of EMT via hnRNP E1. Cytokine 118, 19–26 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ansa-Addo, E. A. et al. RNA binding protein PCBP1 is an intracellular immune checkpoint for shaping T cell responses in cancer immunity. Sci. Adv. 6 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz3865 (2020).

  38. Shi, H. et al. PCBP1 depletion promotes tumorigenesis through attenuation of p27Kip1 mRNA stability and translation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37, 187 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zheng, Y. et al. The RNA-binding protein PCBP1 represses lung adenocarcinoma progression by stabilizing DKK1 mRNA and subsequently downregulating β-catenin. J. Transl. Med. 20, 343 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ji, F. J. et al. Expression of both poly r(C) binding protein 1 (PCBP1) and miRNA-3978 is suppressed in peritoneal gastric cancer metastasis. Sci. Rep. 7, 15488 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goldman, M. J. et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 675–678 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Christenson, J. L. et al. MMTV-PyMT and derived Met-1 mouse mammary tumor cells as models for studying the role of the androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancer progression. Horm. Cancer 8, 69–77 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rusinova, I. et al. INTERFEROME v2.0: an updated database of annotated interferon-regulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 1040–1046 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ghanem, L. R. et al. The Poly(C) binding protein Pcbp2 and its retrotransposed derivative Pcbp1 are independently essential to mouse development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 36, 304–319 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Woo, S. R., Corrales, L. & Gajewski, T. F. Innate immune recognition of cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 33, 445–474 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fuertes, M. B. et al. Host type I IFN signals are required for antitumor CD8+ T cell responses through CD8α+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2005–2016 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Diamond, M. S. et al. Type I interferon is selectively required by dendritic cells for immune rejection of tumors. J. Exp. Med. 208, 1989–2003 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zitvogel, L., Galluzzi, L., Kepp, O., Smyth, M. J. & Kroemer, G. Type I interferons in anticancer immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 405–414 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Liao, C. Y., Lei, C. Q. & Shu, H. B. PCBP1 modulates the innate immune response by facilitating the binding of cGAS to DNA. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 2334–2343 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hollingworth, D. et al. KH domains with impaired nucleic acid binding as a tool for functional analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6873–6886 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kranzusch, P. J., Lee, A. S. Y., Berger, J. M. & Doudna, J. A. Structure of human cGAS reveals a conserved family of second-messenger enzymes in innate immunity. Cell Rep. 3, 1362–1368 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Beck, M. A. et al. DNA hypomethylation leads to cGAS-induced autoinflammation in the epidermis. EMBO J. 40, e108234 (2021).

  53. Lai, J. et al. Zebularine elevates STING expression and enhances cGAMP cancer immunotherapy in mice. Mol. Ther. 29, 1758–1771 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ng, K.aL. amN. elson et al. Activation of Cgas-sting pathway by hypomethylating agent in TP53 mutated MDS/AML. Blood 144, 2726 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Michaelis, L. & Menten, M. L. Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem. Z. 49, 333–369 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Johnson, K. A. & Goody, R. S. The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper. Biochemistry 50, 8264–8269 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Grelet, S. et al. TGFβ-induced expression of long noncoding lincRNA Platr18 controls breast cancer axonogenesis. Life Sci. Alliance 5, e202101261 (2022).

  58. Wang, J. et al. VSIG-3 as a ligand of VISTA inhibits human T-cell function. Immunology 156, 74–85 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sinha, V. C. et al. Single-cell evaluation reveals shifts in the tumor-immune niches that shape and maintain aggressive lesions in the breast. Nat. Commun. 12, 5024 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bai, F. et al. Loss of function of GATA3 induces basal-like mammary tumors. Theranostics 12, 720–733 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mohamed, G. A. et al. Lineage plasticity enables low-ER luminal tumors to evolve and gain basal-like traits. Breast Cancer Res. 25, 23 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Murayama, T. et al. Targeting DHX9 triggers tumor-intrinsic interferon response and replication stress in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 14, 468–491 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ren, X., Liu, Q., Zhou, P., Zhou, T., Wang, D., Mei, Q., Flavell, R. A., Liu, Z., Li, M., Pan, W. & Zhu, S. DHX9 maintains epithelial homeostasis by restraining R-loop-mediated genomic instability in intestinal stem cells. Nat. Commun. 15, 3080 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Karam, J. A. Q. et al. The RNA-binding protein PCBP1 modulates transcription by recruiting the G-quadruplex-specific helicase DHX9. J. Biol. Chem. 300, 107830 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, X. et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP containing mixed Phosphodiester linkages is an endogenous high-affinity ligand for STING. Mol. Cell 51, 226–235 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chen, Y. A. et al. Extrachromosomal telomere repeat DNA is linked to ALT development via cGAS-STING DNA sensing pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 1124–1131 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Neil, C. et al. The pseudoknot region and poly-(C) tract comprise an essential RNA packaging signal for assembly of foot-and-mouth disease virus. PLoS Pathog. 20, e1012283 (2024).

  68. Martin, L. R., Neal, Z. C., McBride, M. S. & Palmenberg, A. C. Mengovirus and encephalomyocarditis virus poly(c) tract lengths can affect virus growth in murine cell culture. J. Virol. 74, 3074–3081 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Penza, V., Russell, S. J. & Schulze, A. J. The long-lasting enigma of polycytidine (polyC) tract. PLoS Pathogens 17, e1009739 (2021).

  70. Ryu, M. S., Zhang, D., Protchenko, O., Shakoury-Elizeh, M. & Philpott, C. C. PCBP1 and NCOA4 regulate erythroid iron storage and heme biosynthesis. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 1786–1797 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Germain, P. L., Lun, A., Macnair, W. & Robinson, M. D. Doublet identification in single-cell sequencing data using scDblFinder. F1000Research 10, 979 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hafemeister, C. & Satija, R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol. 20, 296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Alquicira-Hernandez, J., Sathe, A., Ji, H. P., Nguyen, Q. & Powell, J. E. ScPred: accurate supervised method for cell-type classification from single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 20, 264 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schaum, N. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Squair, J. W. et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5692 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all members of Dr. Philip Howe’s laboratory, Dr. Shikhar Mehrotra, and Paramita Chakraborty for their technical help and helpful feedback. We also thank members of the Hollings Cancer Centre Translational Science Shared Resource, the Bioinformatics Core and the Flow Cytometry & Cell Sorting Shared Resource. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grant [CA154663] to P.H.H. The work was also supported in part by the Translational Science Shared Resource, Bioinformatics Core and Flow Cytometry & Cell Sorting Shared Resource, Hollings Cancer Centre, Medical University of South Carolina [P30 CA138313]. Funding for open access charge: National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Cécile Fréreux, Joseph A. Q. Karam, Breege V. Howley, Annamarie C. Dalton & Philip H. Howe

  2. Bioinformatics Core, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Bryan Granger

  3. Department of Surgery, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Paramita Chakraborty & Shikhar Mehrotra

  4. Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Silvia Vaena, Martin Romeo & Philip H. Howe

  5. Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, SC, USA

    Bidyut K. Mohanty

Authors
  1. Cécile Fréreux
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph A. Q. Karam
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Breege V. Howley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bryan Granger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paramita Chakraborty
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Silvia Vaena
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Martin Romeo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Annamarie C. Dalton
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bidyut K. Mohanty
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shikhar Mehrotra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Philip H. Howe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.F. conceived the study, designed the methodology, acquired all data, and wrote the manuscript. J.A.Q.K. assisted with EMSAs, and B.M. contributed additional methodological support. P.C. provided expertise in methodology and acquisition of flow cytometry data, with resource support from S.M. Library preparation for bulk and single-nuclei RNA sequencing was performed by S.V. and Romeo Martin. Bioinformatic analysis of bulk RNA sequencing was carried out by C.F., and single-nuclei RNA sequencing analysis by B.G. A.D. analysed the CD8/CD3 multiplex IHC. Additional supervision was provided by B.V.H. and P.H.H.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip H. Howe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Francisco Venegas Solis and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Isabela Pedroza-Pacheco and Johannes Stortz. [A peer review file is available].

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary File

Supplementary data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fréreux, C., Karam, J.A.Q., Howley, B.V. et al. PCBP1 binding to single-stranded poly-cytosine motifs enhances cGAS sensing and impairs breast cancer development. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09456-z

Download citation

  • Received: 07 January 2025

  • Accepted: 19 December 2025

  • Published: 07 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09456-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer