Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
The role of white matter myelin in structural-functional network coupling
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 March 2026

The role of white matter myelin in structural-functional network coupling

  • Mark C. Nelson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1074-08141,2,
  • Wen Da Lu2,3,
  • Ilana R. Leppert2,
  • Heather A. Hansen1,
  • Christopher D. Rowley  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-69724,
  • Bratislav Misic  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-28621,2 &
  • …
  • Christine L. Tardif  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-68081,2,3 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1101 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Brain
  • Myelin biology and repair
  • Network models

Abstract

The brain is a complex network of neuronal populations interconnected by white matter tracts. The composition of these white matter connections (SC) shapes inter-regional signaling dynamics giving rise to spatial patterns of synchronous functional connectivity (FC). Several modeling approaches have proven useful for studying the mechanisms underlying the relationship between SC and FC. However, despite being a major component of white matter connectivity, the myelination of white matter tracts is not accounted for by conventional SC networks and has therefore largely been excluded from models of FC. Here, we expand structure-function brain modeling by integrating a multi-feature white matter SC network. We use multi-modal MRI to compute an SC network with connections (edges) weighted by the caliber, myelination, and length of white matter tracts. We investigate the relationship of this multi-feature SC network with both haemodynamic and electromagnetic FC. Edge myelin was strongly predictive of FC in a pattern that was heterogeneous across brain regions and timescales of neural function. Edge myelin showed strong, frequency-specific interactions with both edge caliber and length suggesting a modulatory role for white matter myelin in structure-function coupling. This was further supported by antagonistic gradients of white matter myelin and structure-function coupling along the sensory-association axis. We describe in detail the individual and joint relationships between these major white matter features and multi-frequency FC. These results illustrate the advantage of a more comprehensive characterization of white matter in structure-function models and establish how white matter myelin—known for roles in conduction velocity, plasticity, and metabolic support at the microscale—shapes brain function at the systems-level.

Similar content being viewed by others

Developmental changes of the white matter functional connectome

Article 04 February 2026

Dual-axis myelination covariance drives the functional connectivity emergence during infancy

Article Open access 19 March 2026

A macroscopic link between interhemispheric tract myelination and cortico-cortical interactions during action reprogramming

Article Open access 22 July 2022

Data availability

All data necessary to replicate this work are freely available for download at https://github.com/TardifLab/Modeling-Myelin-FC. Source data for all plots shown here can be found in Supplementary Data.

Code availability

All code necessary to replicate this work are freely available for download at https://github.com/TardifLab/Modeling-Myelin-FC. We provide the MATLAB code directly used in this analysis, along with a translated Python library for user convenience.

References

  1. Newman, M. E. J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167–256 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newman, M. Networks. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Vol. 53 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

  3. Bassett, D. S. & Sporns, O. Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 353–364 (2017).

  4. Fornito, A., Zalesky, A. & Bullmore, E. T. Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis (Elsevier, 2016).

  5. Sporns, O. Networks of the Brain (The MIT Press, 2010).

  6. Suárez, L. E., Markello, R. D., Betzel, R. F. & Misic, B. Linking structure and function in macroscale brain networks. Trends Cogn. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.008 (2020).

  7. Sporns, O. The human connectome: a complex network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1224, 109–125 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salvador, R. et al. Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1332–2342 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M. & Hyde, J. S. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Honey, C. J. et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2035–2040 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hagmann, P. et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, 1479–1493 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J. & LeBihan, D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys. J. 66, 259–267 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mori, S. & Barker, P. B. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: Its principle and applications. Anat. Rec. 257, 102–109 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mori, S. & Van Zijl, P. C. M. Fiber tracking: Principles and strategies - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15, 468–480 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Azevedo, F. A. C. et al. Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 513, 532–541 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goriely, A. Eighty-six billion and counting: do we know the number of neurons in the human brain?. Brain 148, 689–691 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seguin, C., Sporns, O. & Zalesky, A. Brain network communication: concepts, models and applications. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 557–574 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seguin, C., Tian, Y. & Zalesky, A. Network communication models improve the behavioral and functional predictive utility of the human structural connectome. Netw. Neurosci. 4, 980–1006 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Preti, M. G. & Van De Ville, D. Decoupling of brain function from structure reveals regional behavioral specialization in humans. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shine, J. M. et al. Human cognition involves the dynamic integration of neural activity and neuromodulatory systems. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 289–296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Popp, J. L. et al. Structural-functional brain network coupling predicts human cognitive ability. Neuroimage 290, 120563 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Litwińczuk, M. C., Muhlert, N., Cloutman, L., Trujillo-Barreto, N. & Woollams, A. Combination of structural and functional connectivity explains unique variation in specific domains of cognitive function. Neuroimage 262, 119531 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Z. Q., Shafiei, G., Baillet, S. & Misic, B. Spatially heterogeneous structure-function coupling in haemodynamic and electromagnetic brain networks. Neuroimage 278, 120276 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zamani Esfahlani, F., Faskowitz, J., Slack, J., Mišić, B. & Betzel, R. F. Local structure-function relationships in human brain networks across the lifespan. Nat. Commun. 13, 2053 (2022).

  25. Vázquez-Rodríguez, B. et al. Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21219–21227 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sydnor, V. J. et al. Neurodevelopment of the association cortices: patterns, mechanisms, and implications for psychopathology. Neuron 109, 2820–2846 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huntenburg, J. M., Bazin, P. L. & Margulies, D. S. Large-scale gradients in human cortical organization. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 21–31 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mesulam, M. M. From sensation to cognition. Brain 121, 1013–1052 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Margulies, D. S. et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12574–12579 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paquola, C. et al. Microstructural and functional gradients are increasingly dissociated in transmodal cortices. PLoS Biol. 17, 1–28 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huntenburg, J. M. et al. A Systematic relationship between functional connectivity and intracortical myelin in the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 27, 981–997 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Glasser, M. F. & Van Essen, D. C. Mapping human cortical areas in vivo based on myelin content as revealed by T1- and T2-weighted MRI. J. Neurosci. 31, 11597–11616 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen, J. Y. et al. Mapping neurotransmitter systems to the structural and functional organization of the human neocortex. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1569–1581 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Burt, J. B. et al. Hierarchy of transcriptomic specialization across human cortex captured by structural neuroimaging topography. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1251–1259 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shafiei, G., Baillet, S. & Misic, B. Human electromagnetic and haemodynamic networks systematically converge in unimodal cortex and diverge in transmodal cortex. PLoS Biol. 20, 1–27 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tewarie, P. et al. Predicting haemodynamic networks using electrophysiology: the role of non-linear and cross-frequency interactions. Neuroimage 130, 273–292 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Florin, E. & Baillet, S. The brain’s resting-state activity is shaped by synchronized cross-frequency coupling of neural oscillations. Neuroimage 111, 26–35 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brookes, M. J. et al. A multi-layer network approach to MEG connectivity analysis. Neuroimage 132, 425–438 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hillebrand, A. et al. Direction of information flow in large-scale resting-state networks is frequency-dependent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3867–3872 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Von Stein, A., Chiang, C. & König, P. Top-down processing mediated by interareal synchronization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14748–14753 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Baillet, S. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 327–339 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Scheeringa, R. & Fries, P. Cortical layers, rhythms and BOLD signals. Neuroimage 197, 689–698 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fries, P. Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence. Neuron 88, 220–235 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chaudhuri, R., Knoblauch, K., Gariel, M. A., Kennedy, H. & Wang, X. J. A large-scale circuit mechanism for hierarchical dynamical processing in the primate cortex. Neuron 88, 419–431 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Murray, J. D. et al. A hierarchy of intrinsic timescales across primate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1661–1663 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mahjoory, K., Schoffelen, J. M., Keitel, A. & Gross, J. The frequency gradient of human resting-state brain oscillations follows cortical hierarchies. Elife 9, 1–18 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hunt, B. A. E. et al. Relationships between cortical myeloarchitecture and electrophysiological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13510–13515 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Helbling, S. et al. Structure predicts function: combining non-invasive electrophysiology with in-vivo histology. Neuroimage 108, 377–385 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Garcés, P. et al. Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: a comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 20–34 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nelson, M. C. et al. The human brain connectome weighted by the myelin content and total intra-axonal cross-sectional area of white matter tracts. Netw. Neurosci. 7, 1363–1388 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Boshkovski, T. et al. The R1-weighted connectome: complementing brain networks with a myelin-sensitive measure. Netw. Neurosci. 5, 358–372 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Caeyenberghs, K., Metzler-Baddeley, C., Foley, S. & Jones, D. K. Dynamics of the human structural connectome underlying working memory training. J. Neurosci. 36, 4056–4066 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Deligianni, F., Carmichael, D. W., Zhang, G. H., Clark, C. A. & Clayden, J. D. NODDI and tensor-based microstructural indices as predictors of functional connectivity. PLoS ONE 11, 1–17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mancini, M. et al. Introducing axonal myelination in connectomics: a preliminary analysis of g-ratio distribution in healthy subjects. Neuroimage 182, 351–359 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Messaritaki, E. et al. Predicting meg resting-state functional connectivity from microstructural information. Netw. Neurosci. 5, 477–504 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. van den Heuvel, M. P., Mandl, R. C. W., Stam, C. J., Kahn, R. S. & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: a graph theoretical analysis. J. Neurosci. 30, 15915–15926 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lu, W. Da. et al. Mapping the aggregate g-ratio of white matter tracts using multi-modal MRI. Imaging Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.49 (2025).

  58. Gast, H. & Assaf, Y. Weighting the structural connectome: exploring its impact on network properties and predicting cognitive performance in the human brain. Netw. Neurosci. 8, 119–137 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Assaf, Y., Blumenfeld-Katzir, T., Yovel, Y. & Basser, P. J. AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 59, 1347–1354 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stikov, N. et al. In vivo histology of the myelin g-ratio with magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 118, 397–405 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Petkoski, S., Ritter, P. & Jirsa, V. K. White-matter degradation and dynamical compensation support age-related functional alterations in human brain. Cereb. Cortex 33, 6241–6256 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bells, S. et al. Changes in white matter microstructure impact cognition by disrupting the ability of neural assemblies to synchronize. J. Neurosci. 37, 8227–8238 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gong, Z. et al. Cerebral white matter myelination is associated with longitudinal changes in processing speed across the adult lifespan. Brain Commun. 6, 1–15 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Huxley, A. F. & Stämpfli, R. Evidence for saltatory conduction in peripheral myelinated nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 108, 315–339 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tasaki, I. The electro-saltatory transmission of the nerve impulse and the effect of narcosis upon the nerve fiber. Am. J. Physiol. 127, 211–227 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lillie, R. S. Factors affecting transmission and recovery in the passive iron nerve model. J. Gen. Physiol. 7, 473–507 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pajevic, S., Basser, P. J. & Fields, R. D. Role of myelin plasticity in oscillations and synchrony of neuronal activity. Neuroscience 276, 135–147 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nunez, P. L., Srinivasan, R. & Fields, R. D. EEG functional connectivity, axon delays and white matter disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 126, 110–120 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Nunez, P. L. & Srinivasan, R. Neocortical dynamics due to axon propagation delays in cortico-cortical fibers: EEG traveling and standing waves with implications for top-down influences on local networks and white matter disease. Brain Res. 1542, 138–166 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Douglas Fields, R. A new mechanism of nervous system plasticity: activity-dependent myelination. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 756–767 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Fields, R. D., Woo, D. H. & Basser, P. J. Glial regulation of the neuronal connectome through local and long-distant communication. Neuron 86, 374–386 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mount, C. W. & Monje, M. Wrapped to adapt: experience-dependent myelination. Neuron 95, 743–756 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bacmeister, C. M. et al. Motor learning drives dynamic patterns of intermittent myelination on learning-activated axons. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1300–1313 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Chorghay, Z., Káradóttir, R. T. & Ruthazer, E. S. White matter plasticity keeps the brain in tune: axons conduct while glia wrap. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 1–15 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D. & Johansen-Berg, H. Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 528–536 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Berman, S., Filo, S. & Mezer, A. A. Modeling conduction delays in the corpus callosum using MRI-measured g-ratio. Neuroimage 195, 128–139 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mancini, M., Tian, Q., Fan, Q., Cercignani, M. & Huang, S. Y. Dissecting whole-brain conduction delays through MRI microstructural measures. Brain Struct. Funct. 226, 2651–2663 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Talidou, A. & Lefebvre, J. Spatial heterogeneity in myelin sheathing impacts signaling reliability and susceptibility to injury. eNeuro 12, 1–18 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Noori, R. et al. Activity-dependent myelination: a glial mechanism of oscillatory self-organization in large-scale brain networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13227–13237 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Park, S. H. & Lefebvre, J. Synchronization and resilience in the Kuramoto white matter network model with adaptive state-dependent delays. J. Math. Neurosci. 10, 16 (2020).

  81. Karimian, M. et al. Effects of synaptic and myelin plasticity on learning in a network of Kuramoto phase oscillators. Chaos 29, 083122 (2019).

  82. Nave, K. A. Myelination and the trophic support of long axons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 275–283 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Asadollahi, E. et al. Oligodendroglial fatty acid metabolism as a central nervous system energy reserve. Nat. Neurosci. 27, (2024).

  84. Ramos-Cabrer, P. et al. Reversible reduction in brain myelin content upon marathon running. Nat. Metab. 7, 1934–1944 (2025).

  85. Harris, J. J. & Attwell, D. The energetics of CNS white matter. J. Neurosci. 32, 356–371 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Glasser, M. F., Goyal, M. S., Preuss, T. M., Raichle, M. E. & Van Essen, D. C. Trends and properties of human cerebral cortex: correlations with cortical myelin content. Neuroimage 93, 165–175 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Fuster, J. M. Gradients of Cortical Plasticity. Brain and Memory: Modulation and Mediation of Neuroplasticity (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).

  88. Fuster, J. M. The Prefrontal Cortex Vol. 4 (Elsevier, 2008).

  89. Sporns, O. Structure and function of complex brain networks. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 15, 247–262 (2013).

  90. Van Essen, D. C. et al. The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Schaefer, A. et al. Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cereb. Cortex 28, 3095–3114 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Budescu, D. V. Dominance analysis: a new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychol. Bull. 114, 542–551 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Azen, R. & Budescu, D. V. The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychol. Methods 8, 129–148 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Baum, G. L. et al. Development of structure–function coupling in human brain networks during youth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 771–778 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Thomas Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Royer, J. et al. An open MRI dataset for multiscale neuroscience. Sci. Data 9, 569 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Filley, C. M. & Fields, R. D. White matter and cognition: making the connection. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 2093–2104 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Saskia Hübner, N. et al. The connectomics of brain demyelination: functional and structural patterns in the cuprizone mouse model. Neuroimage 146, 1–18 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Asleh, J. et al. Brain-wide structural and functional disruption in mice with oligodendrocyte-specific Nf1 deletion is rescued by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 22506–22513 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ibañez, S., Sengupta, N., Luebke, J. I., Wimmer, K. & Weaver, C. M. Myelin dystrophy impairs signal transmission and working memory in a multiscale model of the aging prefrontal cortex. Elife 12, 1–29 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Metzler-Baddeley, C. et al. Dynamics of white matter plasticity underlying working memory training: multimodal evidence from diffusion MRI and relaxometry. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 1509–1520 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Osmanlıoğlu, Y. et al. System-level matching of structural and functional connectomes in the human brain. Neuroimage 199, 93–104 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Wang, P. et al. Inversion of a large-scale circuit model reveals a cortical hierarchy in the dynamic resting human brain. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat7854 (2019).

  104. Buckner, R. L. & Krienen, F. M. The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 648–665 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Hill, J. et al. Similar patterns of cortical expansion during human development and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13135–13140 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Elston, G. N. Cortex, cognition and the cell: new insights into the pyramidal neuron and prefrontal function. Cereb. Cortex 13, 1124–1138 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Colclough, G. L. et al. The heritability of multi-modal connectivity in human brain activity. Elife 6, 1–19 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Yeatman, J. D., Wandell, B. A. & Mezer, A. A. Lifespan maturation and degeneration of human brain white matter. Nat. Commun. 5, 4932 (2014).

  109. Slater, D. A. et al. Evolution of white matter tract microstructure across the life span. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 2252–2268 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Buzsáki, G. & Wang, X. J. Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 203–225 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  111. van den Heuvel, M. P. & Sporns, O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 683–696 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Sepulcre, J. et al. The organization of local and distant functional connectivity in the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, 1–15 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Betzel, R. F. & Bassett, D. S. Specificity and robustness of long-distance connections in weighted, interareal connectomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4880–E4889 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. The economy of brain network organization. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 336–349 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Nave, K. A. & Werner, H. B. Myelination of the nervous system: mechanisms and functions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 503–533 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Nave, K. A., Asadollahi, E. & Sasmita, A. Expanding the function of oligodendrocytes to brain energy metabolism. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 83, 102782 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Narine, M. & Colognato, H. Current insights into oligodendrocyte metabolism and its power to sculpt the myelin landscape. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 16, 1–17 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Lee, Y. et al. Oligodendroglia metabolically support axons and contribute to neurodegeneration. Nature 487, 443–448 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Fünfschilling, U. et al. Glycolytic oligodendrocytes maintain myelin and long-term axonal integrity. Nature 485, 517–521 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Saab, A. S. et al. Oligodendroglial NMDA receptors regulate glucose import and axonal energy metabolism. Neuron 91, 119–132 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Trevisiol, A. et al. Monitoring ATP dynamics in electrically active white matter tracts. Elife 6, 1–17 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Lord, L. D., Expert, P., Huckins, J. F. & Turkheimer, F. E. Cerebral energy metabolism and the brain’s functional network architecture: an integrative review. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 33, 1347–1354 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Koch, M. A., Norris, D. G. & Hund-Georgiadis, M. An investigation of functional and anatomical connectivity using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 16, 241–250 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Babaeeghazvini, P., Rueda-Delgado, L. M., Gooijers, J., Swinnen, S. P. & Daffertshofer, A. Brain structural and functional connectivity: a review of combined works of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and electro-encephalography. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 721206 (2021).

  125. Maier-Hein, K. H. et al. The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat. Commun. 8, 1349 (2017).

  126. Schilling, K. G. et al. Challenges in diffusion MRI tractography—lessons learned from international benchmark competitions. Magn. Reson. Imaging 57, 194–209 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Kong, R. et al. Individual-specific areal-level parcellations improve functional connectivity prediction of behavior. Cereb. Cortex 31, 4477–4500 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Barakovic, M. et al. Resolving bundle-specific intra-axonal T2 values within a voxel using diffusion-relaxation tract-based estimation. Neuroimage 227, 117617 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Marques, J. P. et al. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage 49, 1271–1281 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Mussard, E. et al. Accelerated MP2RAGE imaging using Cartesian phyllotaxis readout and compressed sensing reconstruction. Magn. Reson. Med. 84, 1881–1894 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Cruces, R. R. et al. Micapipe: a pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging and connectome analysis. Neuroimage 263, 119612 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Cox, R. W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162–173 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Cox, R. W. & Hyde, J. S. Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data. NMR Biomed. 10, 171–178 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23, 208–219 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Woolrich, M. W. et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 45, S173–S186 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W. & Smith, S. M. FSL. Neuroimage 62, 782–790 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  137. Avants, B. B. et al. The Insight ToolKit image registration framework. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 1–13 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Avants, B., Tustison, N. & Johnson, H. Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J. 1–35 (2009).

  139. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical surface-based analysis. Neuroimage 9, 179–194 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I. & Dale, A. M. Cortical surface-based analysis: II. Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9, 195–207 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  142. Fischl, B. et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 11–22 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  143. Fischl, B. et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341–355 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  144. Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., Tootell, R. B. H. & Dale, A. M. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 272–284 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  145. Tournier, J. D. et al. MRtrix3: a fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage 202, 116137 (2019).

  146. Tournier, J. D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. MRtrix: diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 22, 53–66 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  147. Tustison, N. J. et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 1310–1320 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Hoopes, A., Mora, J. S., Dalca, A. V., Fischl, B. & Hoffmann, M. SynthStrip: skull-stripping for any brain image. Neuroimage 260, 119474 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  149. Patenaude, B., Smith, S. M., Kennedy, D. N. & Jenkinson, M. A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 56, 907–922 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  150. Zhang, Y., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 45–57 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Smith, R. E., Tournier, J. D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information. Neuroimage 62, 1924–1938 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  152. Andersson, J. L. R., Skare, S. & Ashburner, J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 20, 870–888 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  153. Graham, M. S., Drobnjak, I., Jenkinson, M. & Zhang, H. Quantitative assessment of the susceptibility artefact and its interaction with motion in diffusion MRI. PLoS ONE 12, 1–25 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  154. Smith, S. M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 17, 143–155 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  155. Greve, D. N. & Fischl, B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48, 63–72 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  156. Avants, B. B., Epstein, C. L., Grossman, M. & Gee, J. C. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med. Image Anal. 12, 26–41 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  157. Beckmann, C. F. & Smith, S. M. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 137–152 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  158. Beckmann, C. F., DeLuca, M., Devlin, J. T. & Smith, S. M. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 1001–1013 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  159. Veraart, J. et al. Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 142, 394–406 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  160. Veraart, J., Fieremans, E. & Novikov, D. S. Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory. Magn. Reson. Med. 76, 1582–1593 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  161. Cordero-Grande, L., Christiaens, D., Hutter, J., Price, A. N. & Hajnal, J. V. Complex diffusion-weighted image estimation via matrix recovery under general noise models. Neuroimage 200, 391–404 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  162. Lee, H., Novikov, D. S. & Fieremans, E. Removal of partial Fourier-induced Gibbs (RPG) ringing artifacts in MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 86, 2733–2750 (2021).

  163. Andersson, J. L. R. & Sotiropoulos, S. N. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 125, 1063–1078 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  164. Christiaens, D. et al. Global tractography of multi-shell diffusion-weighted imaging data using a multi-tissue model. Neuroimage 123, 89–101 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  165. Dhollander, T., Raffelt, D. & Connelly, A. Unsupervised 3-tissue response function estimation from single-shell or multi-shell diffusion MR data without a co-registered T1 image. ISMRM Workshop Breaking Barriers Diffus. MRI 35, 1–2 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  166. Dhollander, T., Mito, R., Raffelt, D. & Connelly, A. Improved white matter response function estimation for 3-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution. In Proc. 27th International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 555 (2019).

  167. Jeurissen, B., Tournier, J. D., Dhollander, T., Connelly, A. & Sijbers, J. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 103, 411–426 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  168. Dhollander, T. et al. Multi-tissue log-domain intensity and inhomogeneity normalisation for quantitative apparent density. In 29th International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2472 (2021).

  169. Helms, G., Dathe, H., Kallenberg, K. & Dechent, P. High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 60, 1396–1407 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  170. Rowley, C. D. et al. A model-based framework for correcting B1+ inhomogeneity effects in magnetization transfer saturation and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer saturation maps. Magn. Reson. Med. 86, 2192–2207 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  171. Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. Improved probabilistic streamlines tractography by 2nd order integration over fibre orientation distributions. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 18 (2010).

  172. Smith, R. E., Tournier, J. D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. SIFT2: Enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography. Neuroimage 119, 338–351 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  173. Daducci, A., Dal Palù, A., Lemkaddem, A. & Thiran, J. P. COMMIT: convex optimization modeling for microstructure informed tractography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34, 246–257 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  174. Daducci, A., Dal Palu, A., Lemkaddem, A. & Thiran, J. P. A convex optimization framework for global tractography. In Proc. International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 524–527 (IEEE, 2013).

  175. Schiavi, S. et al. Bundle myelin fraction (BMF) mapping of different white matter connections using microstructure informed tractography. Neuroimage 249, 118922 (2022).

  176. Yeatman, J.D., Dougherty, R.F., Myall, N.J., Wandell, B.A. & Feldman, H.M. Tract profiles of white matter properties: automating fiber-tract quantification. PLoS One 7, 11 (2012).

  177. Roberts, J. A., Perry, A., Roberts, G., Mitchell, P. B. & Breakspear, M. Consistency-based thresholding of the human connectome. Neuroimage 145, 118–129 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  178. Betzel, R. F., Griffa, A., Hagmann, P. & Misic, B. Distance-dependent consensus thresholds for generating group-representative structural brain networks. Netw. Neurosci. 3, 475–496 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  179. Bruns, A., Eckhorn, R., Jokeit, H. & Ebner, A. Amplitude envelope correlation detects coupling among incoherent brain signals. Neuroreport 11, 1509–1514 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  180. Colclough, G. L., Brookes, M. J., Smith, S. M. & Woolrich, M. W. A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes. Neuroimage 117, 439–448 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge research support from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR), Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé (FRQ-S), CFREF Healthy Brains for Healthy Lives, the Killam Trusts, and Brain Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Mark C. Nelson, Heather A. Hansen, Bratislav Misic & Christine L. Tardif

  2. McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Mark C. Nelson, Wen Da Lu, Ilana R. Leppert, Bratislav Misic & Christine L. Tardif

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Wen Da Lu & Christine L. Tardif

  4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Christopher D. Rowley

Authors
  1. Mark C. Nelson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wen Da Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilana R. Leppert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heather A. Hansen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christopher D. Rowley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bratislav Misic
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christine L. Tardif
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology: M.C.N. and C.L.T. Data curation: M.C.N., W.D.L., I.R.L., H.A.H., and C.D.R. Formal analysis: M.C.N. Funding acquisition, resources, and supervision: C.L.T. Visualization and writing—original draft: M.C.N. Writing—review and editing: M.C.N., W.D.L., I.R.L., H.A.H., C.D.R., B.M., and C.L.T.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mark C. Nelson or Christine L. Tardif.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Matteo Battocchio and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Michel Thiebaut de Schotten and Christina Karlsson Rosenthal. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary material (download PDF )

Supplementary data (download ZIP )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download DOCX )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, M.C., Da Lu, W., Leppert, I.R. et al. The role of white matter myelin in structural-functional network coupling. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09813-6

Download citation

  • Received: 28 August 2025

  • Accepted: 24 February 2026

  • Published: 27 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09813-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing