Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Preferential remdesivir triphosphate incorporation by SARS-CoV-2 polymerase is altered to ATP by the S759A mutation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 March 2026

Preferential remdesivir triphosphate incorporation by SARS-CoV-2 polymerase is altered to ATP by the S759A mutation

  • Calvin J. Gordon  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8259-62011,2 na1,
  • Mizar F. Oliva3 na1,
  • Hery W. Lee  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3981-02841,
  • Quinten Goovaerts  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-11033,
  • Brent De Wijngaert  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-88973,
  • Matthias Götte  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-58061 &
  • …
  • Kalyan Das  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8897-324X1,2,3 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1279 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cryoelectron microscopy
  • Enzyme mechanisms

Abstract

Nucleoside analogs are successful in treating viral infections. dNTP analogs are primarily DNA chain terminators, while NTP analog remdesivir can inhibit RNA synthesis by delayed chain termination or when embedded in the template strand. Here, enzymatic assays, mass spectrometry, and cryo-EM structures demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) preferentially incorporates remdesivir triphosphate (RTP), outcompeting 10-fold excess ATP; however, successive RTP incorporations are disfavored when ATP is present. The RdRp structures demonstrate that 1′-cyano-imposed conformational restriction of the remdesivir:UMP base-pair is resistant to translocation, reducing successive RTP incorporations. The S759A mutant confers RTP resistance. We show that the mutation switches the RdRp preference to ATP; RTP is incorporated only at 10-fold excess to ATP. The structures of S759A RdRp reveal that the primer 3′-end nucleotide repositioning and its altered ribose-ring conformation contribute to RTP resistance. These findings have implications for designing non-obligate nucleoside analogs with different inhibition mechanisms.

Similar content being viewed by others

Structural basis for substrate selection by the SARS-CoV-2 replicase

Article 01 February 2023

Construction and validation of a cell based reporter assay for identifying inhibitors of SARS coronavirus 2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity

Article Open access 26 May 2025

Dynamic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 genetic mutations in a lung transplantation patient with persistent COVID-19

Article Open access 29 April 2024

Data availability

The data that support this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The coordinates and cryo-EM density maps for the structures WT-AMP, WT-RMP, S759A-AMP, and S759A-RMP are deposited with PDB accession codes/EMDB codes 9SAR /EMD-54695, 9SAP/EMD-54693, 9SAQ/EMD-54694, and 9SAO/EMD-54692, respectively. All MS data can be obtained from the Open Science Framework (OSF) online repository at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YDRT3.

References

  1. Seley-Radtke, K. L. & Yates, M. K. The evolution of nucleoside analogue antivirals: A review for chemists and non-chemists. Part 1: early structural modifications to the nucleoside scaffold. Antivir. Res. 154, 66–86 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh, A. K. & Das, K. Insights into HIV-1 Reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibition and drug resistance from thirty years of structural studies. Viruses 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/v14051027 (2022).

  3. Keating, G. M. Sofosbuvir: a review of its use in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Drugs 74, 1127–1146 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, S. S. et al. Inhibition of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by 2’-modified nucleoside analogs. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 11979–11984 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon, C. J. et al. Remdesivir is a direct-acting antiviral that inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with high potency. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 6785–6797 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dangerfield, T. L., Huang, N. Z. & Johnson, K. A. Remdesivir is effective in combating COVID-19 because it is a better substrate than ATP for the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. iScience 23, 101849 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seifert, M. et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase by nucleotide analogs from a single-molecule perspective. Elife 10, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70968 (2021).

  8. Gordon, C. J. et al. Efficient incorporation and template-dependent polymerase inhibition are major determinants for the broad-spectrum antiviral activity of remdesivir. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101529 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tchesnokov, E. P., Feng, J. Y., Porter, D. P. & Gotte, M. Mechanism of inhibition of Ebola Virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by remdesivir. Viruses 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/v11040326 (2019).

  10. Gordon, C. J., Tchesnokov, E. P., Schinazi, R. F. & Gotte, M. Molnupiravir promotes SARS-CoV-2 mutagenesis via the RNA template. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 100770 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kabinger, F. et al. Mechanism of molnupiravir-induced SARS-CoV-2 mutagenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 740–746 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, E. C., Blanc, H., Surdel, M. C., Vignuzzi, M. & Denison, M. R. Coronaviruses lacking exoribonuclease activity are susceptible to lethal mutagenesis: evidence for proofreading and potential therapeutics. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003565 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, E. C. & Denison, M. R. Coronaviruses as DNA wannabes: a new model for the regulation of RNA virus replication fidelity. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003760 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Minskaia, E. et al. Discovery of an RNA virus 3’->5’ exoribonuclease that is critically involved in coronavirus RNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5108–5113 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bouvet, M. et al. RNA 3’-end mismatch excision by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein nsp10/nsp14 exoribonuclease complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9372–9377 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agostini, M. L. et al. Coronavirus susceptibility to the antiviral remdesivir (GS-5734) is mediated by the viral polymerase and the proofreading exoribonuclease. mBio 9, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00221-18 (2018).

  17. Agostini, M. L. et al. Small-Molecule antiviral beta-d-N(4)-hydroxycytidine inhibits a proofreading-intact coronavirus with a high genetic barrier to resistance. J. Virol. 93, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01348-19 (2019).

  18. te Velthuis, A. J. Common and unique features of viral RNA-dependent polymerases. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 71, 4403–4420 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yin, W. et al. Structural basis for inhibition of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from SARS-CoV-2 by remdesivir. Science 368, 1499–1504 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malone, B. F. et al. Structural basis for substrate selection by the SARS-CoV-2 replicase. Nature 614, 781–787 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kokic, G. et al. Mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase stalling by remdesivir. Nat. Commun. 12, 279 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bravo, J. P. K., Dangerfield, T. L., Taylor, D. W. & Johnson, K. A. Remdesivir is a delayed translocation inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 replication. Mol. Cell 81, 1548–1552 e1544 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lu, G. et al. Development of a simple in vitro assay to identify and evaluate nucleotide analogs against SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 65, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01508-20 (2020).

  24. Wang, Q. et al. Structural basis for RNA replication by the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase. Cell 182, 417–428 e413 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tchesnokov, E. P. et al. Template-dependent inhibition of coronavirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by remdesivir reveals a second mechanism of action. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 16156–16165 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, J. et al. Remdesivir overcomes the S861 roadblock in SARS-CoV-2 polymerase elongation complex. Cell Rep. 37, 109882 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gordon, C. J. et al. Mechanism and spectrum of inhibition of a 4’-cyano modified nucleotide analog against diverse RNA polymerases of prototypic respiratory RNA viruses. J. Biol. Chem. 300, 107514 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stevens, L. J. et al. Mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase confer resistance to remdesivir by distinct mechanisms. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabo0718 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sama, B. et al. The effects of Remdesivir’s functional groups on its antiviral potency and resistance against the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase. Antivir. Res 232, 106034 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, N., Zhang, S. & Szostak, J. W. Activated ribonucleotides undergo a sugar pucker switch upon binding to a single-stranded RNA template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3691–3694 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chang, C. E., Chen, W. & Gilson, M. K. Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1534–1539 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Donlin, M. J., Patel, S. S. & Johnson, K. A. Kinetic partitioning between the exonuclease and polymerase sites in DNA error correction. Biochemistry 30, 538–546 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Posthuma, C. C., Te Velthuis, A. J. W. & Snijder, E. J. Nidovirus RNA polymerases: complex enzymes handling exceptional RNA genomes. Virus Res. 234, 58–73 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gong, P. & Peersen, O. B. Structural basis for active site closure by the poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22505–22510 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shannon, A. et al. Rapid incorporation of Favipiravir by the fast and permissive viral RNA polymerase complex results in SARS-CoV-2 lethal mutagenesis. Nat. Commun. 11, 4682 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Campagnola, G., Govindarajan, V., Pelletier, A., Canard, B. & Peersen, O. B. The SARS-CoV nsp12 polymerase active site is tuned for large-genome replication. J. Virol. 96, e0067122 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Traut, T. W. Physiological concentrations of purines and pyrimidines. Mol. Cell Biochem 140, 1–22 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Palermiti, A. et al. A Novel HPLC-MS/MS Method for the Intracellular Quantification of the Active Triphosphate Metabolite of Remdesivir: GS-443902. J. Xenobiot. 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15040107 (2025).

  39. Humeniuk, R. et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of remdesivir, an antiviral for treatment of COVID-19, in healthy subjects. Clin. Transl. Sci. 13, 896–906 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, Y. et al. Molecular basis of SARS-CoV-2 proofreading enzyme-mediated resistance to remdesivir. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2519755122 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gandhi, S. et al. De novo emergence of a remdesivir resistance mutation during treatment of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in an immunocompromised patient: a case report. Nat. Commun. 13, 1547 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hedskog, C. et al. Viral resistance analyses from the remdesivir phase 3 adaptive COVID-19 treatment trial-1 (ACTT-1). J. Infect. Dis. 228, 1263–1273 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hogan, J. I. et al. Remdesivir resistance in transplant recipients with persistent coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 76, 342–345 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Igari, H. et al. Dynamic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 genetic mutations in a lung transplantation patient with persistent COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 15, 3604 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Martinot, M. et al. Emerging RNA-dependent RNA polymerase mutation in a remdesivir-treated B-cell immunodeficient patient with protracted coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73, e1762–e1765 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ichikawa, T. et al. Characterization of remdesivir resistance mutations in COVID-19 patients with various immunosuppressive diseases. Antivir. Res. 242, 106264 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fernandez-Antunez, C. et al. SARS-CoV-2 remdesivir exposure leads to different evolutionary pathways that converge in moderate levels of drug resistance. Viruses 17, https://doi.org/10.3390/v17081055 (2025).

  48. Malone, B. et al. Structural basis for backtracking by the SARS-CoV-2 replication-transcription complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102516118 (2021).

  49. Das, K. & Arnold, E. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and antiviral drug resistance. Part 2. Curr. Opin. Virol. 3, 119–128 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sarafianos, S. G. et al. Lamivudine (3TC) resistance in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase involves steric hindrance with beta-branched amino acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10027–10032 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Das, K. et al. Molecular modeling and biochemical characterization reveal the mechanism of hepatitis B virus polymerase resistance to lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC). J. Virol. 75, 4771–4779 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jordan, P. C. et al. Initiation, extension, and termination of RNA synthesis by a paramyxovirus polymerase. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006889 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Warren, T. K. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of the small molecule GS-5734 against Ebola virus in rhesus monkeys. Nature 531, 381–385 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Madru, C. et al. Fast and efficient purification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase complex expressed in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 16, e0250610 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42166 (2018).

  57. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Canada Excellence Research Chair (CERC) funding and KU Leuven research grant C24E/22/035 to K.D. K.D. and M.G. also acknowledge support from The Alberta Ministry of Technology and Innovation, through SPP-ARC (Striving for Pandemic Preparedness—The Alberta Research Consortium). C.J.G. acknowledges support from CIHR funding reference number 181545. Q.G. acknowledges financial support from the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) through doctoral fellowship grant number 1162823N and 1162825N. The authors acknowledge Dr. Abhimanyu Singh for advice on protein expression, Dr. Randy Whittal and Dr. Joseph Utomo at the Mass Spectrometry facility at the University of Alberta for the MS analysis.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Calvin J. Gordon, Mizar F. Oliva.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Calvin J. Gordon, Hery W. Lee, Matthias Götte & Kalyan Das

  2. Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Calvin J. Gordon & Kalyan Das

  3. Molecular Structural and Translational Virology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Mizar F. Oliva, Quinten Goovaerts, Brent De Wijngaert & Kalyan Das

Authors
  1. Calvin J. Gordon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mizar F. Oliva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hery W. Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Quinten Goovaerts
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brent De Wijngaert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthias Götte
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kalyan Das
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: C.J.G., M.G., K.D.; Investigation and Methodology: C.J.G. and H.W.L.; Biochemistry: C.J.G.; MS: C.J.G.; Protein purification: M.F.O.; Cryo-EM and structural studies: M.F.O., Q.G., and B.D-W.; Data analysis: C.J.G., H.W.L., M.G.; Structural biology: M.F.O., Q.G., and K.D.; Funding acquisition: K.D. and M.G.; Project administration and supervision: K.D. Original draft written by: C.J.G., M.F.O., K.D.; Reviewed and edited by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalyan Das.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Joanna Timmins and Laura Rodríguez Pérez. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

reporting summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gordon, C.J., Oliva, M.F., Lee, H.W. et al. Preferential remdesivir triphosphate incorporation by SARS-CoV-2 polymerase is altered to ATP by the S759A mutation. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09844-z

Download citation

  • Received: 06 October 2025

  • Accepted: 02 March 2026

  • Published: 13 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09844-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing