Fig. 1: Specific heat vs. temperature for Ag3LiIr2O6 and α–LiIr2O3.
From: Signatures of a Majorana-Fermi surface in the Kitaev magnet Ag3LiIr2O6

Measured values of the specific heat C(T) divided by temperature T (denoted by γ(T) ≡ C(T)/T) vs T for a Ag3LiIr2O6 and c α–LiIr2O3, both with the Schottky contributions subtracted. We also give the plots of δ(T) ≡ (γ(T) − γ0)/T for the same compounds (shown in b and d, respectively). The specific heat data for α–LiIr2O3 is taken from the work of Mehlawat, Thamizhavel, and Singh41. For plots of the raw data of the Ag3LiIr2O6, see Figs. 6 and 7 in the Methods section. The data in a fit to a general quadratic, in agreement with Eqn. (1). However, the general temperature dependence for the specific heat in α–LiIr2O3, as shown in c, lacks the strong quadratic behavior predicted from Eqn. (1). The plotted values of δ(T) in b and d represent the same specific heat data, but plotted in such a way as to discern possible linear-T dependence. The blue dots (left axis) are the unrenormalized data of δ(T) defined in text, while the red dots (right axis) are the data renormalized by the projected T = 0 value. A finite y-intercept in b suggests a finite T/Tcut term in γ(T).