Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Physics
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications physics
  3. articles
  4. article
Regularized micromagnetic theory for Bloch points
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 March 2026

Regularized micromagnetic theory for Bloch points

  • Vladyslav M. Kuchkin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-320X1,
  • Andreas Haller  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-16281,
  • Andreas Michels1,
  • Thomas L. Schmidt  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-39131 &
  • …
  • Nikolai S. Kiselev  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7423-08402 

Communications Physics , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1346 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Magnetic properties and materials

Abstract

Magnetic singularities known as Bloch points (BPs) present a fundamental challenge for micromagnetic theory, which is based on the assumption of a fixed magnetization vector length. Due to the divergence of the effective field at a BP, classical micromagnetics fails to adequately describe BP dynamics. To address this issue, we propose a regularized micromagnetic model in which the magnetization vector can vary in length but not exceed a threshold value. More specifically, the magnetization is treated as an order parameter constrained to an \({{\mathbb{S}}}^{3}\)-sphere. This constraint respects fundamental properties of local spin expectation values in quantum systems. We derive the corresponding regularized Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation and the analog of the Thiele equation describing the steady motion of spin textures under various external stimuli. We demonstrate the applicability of our theory by modeling the dynamics of several magnetic textures containing BPs, including domain walls in nanowires, chiral bobbers, and magnetic dipolar strings. The presented results extend micromagnetic theory by incorporating a regularized description of BP dynamics.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bloch points and topological dipoles observed by X-ray vector magnetic tomography in a ferromagnetic microstructure

Article Open access 17 March 2023

Tailoring the energy landscape of a bloch point domain wall with curvature

Article Open access 11 August 2025

Current-induced motion of nanoscale magnetic torons over the wide range of the Hall angle

Article Open access 15 February 2025

Data availability

Source data for micromagnetic simulations and scripts for post-processing are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17474662.

References

  1. Brown, W. F. Micromagnetics (Interscience Publishers, 1963).

  2. Aharoni, A. Introduction to the Theory of Ferromagnetism. (Clarendon Press, 2000).

  3. Chikazumi, S. & Graham, C. D. Physics of Ferromagnetism. (Oxford University Press, 1997).

  4. Hubert, A. & Schäfer, R. Magnetic Domains: the Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures (Springer, 2008).

  5. Chumak, A. V., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing. Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2014).

  6. Parkin, S. S. P., Hayashi, M. & Thomas, L. Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory. Science 320, 190–194 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wolf, S. A. et al. Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future. Science 294, 1488–1495 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’ Dell, T. H. Magnetic bubble domain devices. Rep. Prog. Phys. 49, 589 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malozemoff, A. & Slonczewski, J. C. Magnetic Domain Walls in Bubble Materials: Advances in Materials and Device Research, vol. 1 (Academic Press, 1979).

  10. Victora, R. & Shen, X. Exchange coupled composite media for perpendicular magnetic recording. IEEE Trans. Magn. 41, 2828–2833 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coey, J. Permanent magnet applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 248, 441–456 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, H.-W., Sakar, M. S., Petruska, A. J., Pané, S. & Nelson, B. J. Soft micromachines with programmable motility and morphology. Nat. Commun. 7, 12263 (2016).

  13. Wu, S. et al. Evolutionary algorithm-guided voxel-encoding printing of functional hard-magnetic soft active materials. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2, 202000060 (2020).

  14. Feldtkeller, E. Mikromagnetisch stetige und unstetige magnetisierungskonfigurationen. Z. f.ür. Angew. Phys. 19, 530–536 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Döring, W. Point singularities in micromagnetism. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1006–1007 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rybakov, F. N., Eriksson, O. & Kiselev, N. S. Topological invariants of vortices, merons, skyrmions, and their combinations in continuous and discrete systems. Phys. Rev. B 111, 134417 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bogdanov, A. N. & Yablonskii, D. A. Thermodynamically stable “vortices" in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of magnets. Sov. Phys. JETP 68, 101 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tokura, Y. & Kanazawa, N. Magnetic skyrmion materials. Chem. Rev. 121, 2857–2897 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Voinescu, R., Tai, J.-S. B. & Smalyukh, I. I. Hopf solitons in helical and conical backgrounds of chiral magnetic solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 057201 (2020).

  20. Rybakov, F. N. et al. Magnetic hopfions in solids. APL Mater. 10, 99942 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0099942 (2022).

  21. Zheng, F. et al. Hopfion rings in a cubic chiral magnet. Nature 623, 718–723 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slonczewski, J. C. Properties of bloch points in bubble domains. In AIP Conference Proceedings 24, 613–614 (AIP, 1975). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.30197.

  23. Jantz, W., Slonczewski, J. & Argyle, B. Effects of bloch lines and bloch points on resonances of magnetic bubbles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 23, 8–14 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Argyle, B. E., Maekawa, S., Dekker, P. & Slonczewski, J. C. Gradientless propulsion and state switching of bubble domains. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 131–137 (American Institute of Physics, 1976). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2946038.

  25. Bullock, D. C. The effect of a constant in-plane magnetic field on magnetic bubble translation in. In MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS - 1973: Nineteenth Annual Conference, 232-236 (ASCE, 1974). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2947324.

  26. Hasegawa, R. Effect of bloch points on the dynamic properties of bubble domain. In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 24, 615–616 (AIP, 1975). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.30198.

  27. Josephs, R. M., Stein, B. F. & Bekebrede, W. R. Bubble domain translational motion in the presence of an in-plane field. AIP Conference Proc. 29, 65–66 (AIP, 1976). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.30506.

  28. Milde, P. et al. Unwinding of a skyrmion lattice by magnetic monopoles. Science 340, 1076–1080 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Da Col, S. et al. Observation of bloch-point domain walls in cylindrical magnetic nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 89, 180405 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jamet, S. et al. Quantitative analysis of shadow x-ray magnetic circular dichroism photoemission electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 92, 144428. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.144428 (2015).

  31. Im, M.-Y. et al. Dynamics of the bloch point in an asymmetric permalloy disk. Nat. Commun. 10, 593 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng, F. et al. Experimental observation of chiral magnetic bobbers in b20-type fege. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 451–455 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wartelle, A. et al. Bloch-point-mediated topological transformations of magnetic domain walls in cylindrical nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 99, 024433. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.024433. (2019).

  34. Álvaro-Gómez, L. et al. Topological analysis and experimental control of transformations of domain walls in magnetic cylindrical nanowires. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023092 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wohlhüter, P. et al. Nanoscale switch for vortex polarization mediated by bloch core formation in magnetic hybrid systems. Nat. Commun. 6, 8836 (2015).

  36. Kanazawa, N. et al. Critical phenomena of emergent magnetic monopoles in a chiral magnet. Nat. Commun. 7, 11622 (2016).

  37. Donnelly, C. et al. Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with x-ray vector nanotomography. Nature 547, 328–331 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Donnelly, C. et al. Experimental observation of vortex rings in a bulk magnet. Nat. Phys. 17, 316–321 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Han, H.-S. et al. Topology-dependent stability of vortex-antivortex structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 212407 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0045593 (2021).

  40. Schöbitz, M. et al. Time-resolved imaging of Ersted field induced magnetization dynamics in cylindrical magnetic nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 172411 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046643 (2021).

  41. Arekapudi, S. S. P. K. et al. Direct imaging of distorted vortex structures and magnetic vortex annihilation processes in ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic disk structures. Phys. Rev. B 103, 014405 (2021).

  42. Grelier, M. et al. Three-dimensional skyrmionic cocoons in magnetic multilayers. Nat. Commun. 13, 6843 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Savchenko, A. S. et al. Diversity of states in a chiral magnet nanocylinder. APL Mater. 10, 97650 (2022).

  44. Yasin, F. S. et al. Bloch point quadrupole constituting hybrid topological strings revealed with electron holographic vector field tomography. Adv. Mater. 36, 11737 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202311737 (2024).

  45. Han, H.-S. et al. Manipulation of the magnetic monopole injection for topological transition. NPG Asia Mater. 16, 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-024-00529-9 (2024).

  46. Kern, L. et al. Controlled formation of skyrmion bags. Adv. Mater. 37, 2501250 (2025).

  47. Hubert, A. Mikromagnetisch singuläre punkte in bubbles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2, 25–31 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Arrott, A., Heinrich, B. & Aharoni, A. Point singularities and magnetization reversal in ideally soft ferromagnetic cylinders. IEEE Trans. Magn. 15, 1228–1235 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Aharoni, A. Exchange energy near singular points or lines. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3330–3332 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sokalski, K. Spin configurations near singularities in micromagnetism. Phys. Lett. A 75, 491–492 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kufaev, Y. A. & Sonin, E. B. Vibrations of a bloch line with a bloch point. Fiz. Tverd. Tela 30, 3272–3275 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kufaev, Y. A. & Sonin, E. B. Dynamics of a bloch point (point soliton) in a ferromagnet. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 95, 1523–1529 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kabanov, Y. P., Dedukh, L. M. & Nikitenko, V. I. Bloch points in an oscillating bloch line. Pis.Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 551–554 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kufaev, Y. A. & Sonin, E. B. Effects of magnetostatic stray fields on the dynamics and interaction of bloch points. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 101, 1550–1560 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Galkina, E., Ivanov, B. & Stephanovich, V. Phenomenological theory of bloch point relaxation. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 118, 373–378 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Thiaville, A. & Miltat, J. Controlled injection of a singular point along a linear magnetic structure. Europhys. Lett. 26, 57–62 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Forster, H. et al. Domain wall motion in nanowires using moving grids (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 91, 6914–6919 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Thiaville, A., García, J. M., Dittrich, R., Miltat, J. & Schrefl, T. Micromagnetic study of bloch-point-mediated vortex core reversal. Phys.Rev. B 67, 094410 (2003).

  59. Van Waeyenberge, B. et al. Magnetic vortex core reversal by excitation with short bursts of an alternating field. Nature 444, 461–464 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Komineas, S. Rotating vortex dipoles in ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 117202 (2007).

  61. Volkov, V. V. & Bokov, V. A. Domain wall dynamics in ferromagnets. Phys. Solid State 50, 199–228 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Elías, R. G. & Verga, A. Magnetization structure of a bloch point singularity. Eur. Phys. J. B 82, 159–166 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lebecki, K. M., Hinzke, D., Nowak, U. & Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. Key role of temperature in ferromagnetic bloch point simulations. Phys. Rev. B 86, 094409 (2012).

  64. Pylypovskyi, O. V., Sheka, D. D. & Gaididei, Y. Bloch point structure in a magnetic nanosphere. Phys. Rev. B 85, 224401 (2012)..

  65. Zverev, V. V. & Filippov, B. N. Transition micromagnetic structures in asymmetric vortexlike domain walls (static solutions and dynamic reconstructions). J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 117, 108–120 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schütte, C. & Rosch, A. Dynamics and energetics of emergent magnetic monopoles in chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. B 90, 174432 (2014).

  67. Andreas, C., Gliga, S. & Hertel, R. Numerical micromagnetism of strong inhomogeneities. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 362, 7–13 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Carvalho-Santos, V., Elías, R. & Nunez, A. Spin wave vortex from the scattering on bloch point solitons. Ann. Phys. 363, 364–370 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pylypovskyi, O. V., Sheka, D. D., Kravchuk, V. P. & Gaididei, Y. Vortex polarity switching in magnets with surface anisotropy. Low. Temp. Phys. 41, 361–374 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  70. De Lucia, A., Litzius, K., Krüger, B., Tretiakov, O. A. & Kläui, M. Multiscale simulations of topological transformations in magnetic-skyrmion spin structures. Phys. Rev. B 96, 020405 (2017).

  71. Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Diversity of knot solitons in liquid crystals manifested by linking of preimages in torons and hopfions. Phys. Rev. X 7, 011006 (2017).

  72. Beg, M. et al. Stable and manipulable bloch point. Sci. Rep. 9, 2 (2019).

  73. Charilaou, M. Prediction of confined and controllable bloch points in nanocubes of chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. B 102, 014430 (2020).

  74. Müller, G. P., Rybakov, F. N., Jónsson, H., Blügel, S. & Kiselev, N. S. Coupled quasimonopoles in chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. B 101, 184405 (2020).

  75. Gorobets, O., Gorobets, Y., Tiukavkina, I. & Gerasimenko, R. Spin-polarized current-driven ferromagnetic domain wall motion with a skyrmion-like building block. Ukrainian J. Phys. 65, 919 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pathak, S. A. & Hertel, R. Three-dimensional chiral magnetization structures in fege nanospheres. Phys. Rev. B 103, 104414 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.103.104414 (2021).

  77. De Riz, A. et al. Mechanism of fast domain wall motion via current-assisted bloch-point domain wall stabilization. Phys. Rev. B 103, 054430 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.054430(2021).

  78. Birch, M. T. et al. Topological defect-mediated skyrmion annihilation in three dimensions. Commun. Phys. 4, 4 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00675-4 (2021).

  79. Azhar, M., Kravchuk, V. P. & Garst, M. Screw dislocations in chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 157204 (2022).

  80. Sáez, G., Díaz, P., Vidal-Silva, N., Escrig, J. & Vogel, E. E. Bloch points stabilization by means of diameter modulations in cylindrical nanowires. Results Phys. 39, 105768 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kuchkin, V. M. et al. Heliknoton in a film of cubic chiral magnet. Front. Phys. 11, 1201018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1201018 (2023).

  82. Zambrano-Rabanal, C. et al. Magnetostatic interaction between bloch point nanospheres. Sci. Rep. 13, 34167 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34167-y (2023).

  83. Castillo-Sepúlveda, S. et al. Nucleation and stability of toron chains in non-centrosymmetric magnetic nanowires. Nanomaterials 13, 1816 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Lang, M., Beg, M., Hovorka, O. & Fangohr, H. Bloch points in nanostrips. Sci. Rep. 13, 33998 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33998-z (2023).

  85. Qiu, L., Shen, L. & Shen, K. Spin-wave-driven tornado-like dynamics of three-dimensional topological magnetic textures. Commun. Phys. 7, 116 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01608-7 (2024).

  86. Hermosa-Muñoz, J. et al. Hyperbolic bloch points in ferrimagnetic exchange spring. Results Phys. 61, 107771 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kim, S. T., Han, H.-S., Im, M.-Y. & Je, S.-G. Control of a twisted domain wall motion supported by topology. J. Appl. Phys. 135, 0187965 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0187965 (2024).

  88. Shimizu, K., Okumura, S., Kato, Y. & Motome, Y. Current-induced motion of nanoscale magnetic torons over the wide range of the hall angle. Commun. Phys. 8, 69 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-01970-0 (2025).

  89. Yastremsky, I. A. Magnetization length in the bloch point at finite temperatures. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 616, 172834 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Winkler, T. B., Beg, M., Lang, M., Kläui, M. & Fangohr, H. Simulating bloch points using micromagnetic and heisenberg models. IEEE Trans. Magn. 61, 1–8 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Baryakhtar, V. Phenomenological description of relaxation processes in magnets. ZHurnal Eksperimentalnoi I Teoreticheskoi Fiziki 87, 1501–1508 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Garanin, D. A. Fokker-planck and Landau-lifshitz-bloch equations for classical ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 55, 3050–3057 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Elías, R. G., Carvalho-Santos, V. L., Núñez, A. S. & Verga, A. D. Spin waves scattering on a bloch point. Phys. Rev. B 90, 224414 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224414 (2014).

  94. Tapia, A., Saji, C., Roldán-Molina, A. & Nunez, A. S. Stability enhancement by zero-point spin fluctuations: a quantum perspective on bloch point topological singularities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 12721 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202312721 (2024).

  95. Kuchkin, V. M. et al. Quantum and classical magnetic bloch points. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013195 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013195 (2025).

  96. Hubert, A. & Schäfer, R.Magnetic domains: the analysis of magnetic microstructures (Springer, 1998).

  97. Di Fratta, G., Muratov, C. B., Rybakov, F. N. & Slastikov, V. V. Variational principles of micromagnetics revisited. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52, 3580–3599 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Zheng, F. et al. Magnetic skyrmion braids. Nat. Commun. 12, 5316 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Physikalische Z. der Sowjetunion 8, 153 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Zhang, S. & Li, Z. Roles of nonequilibrium conduction electrons on the magnetization dynamics of ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.127204 (2004).

  101. Bajpai, U. & Nikolić, B. K. Time-retarded damping and magnetic inertia in the landau-lifshitz-gilbert equation self-consistently coupled to electronic time-dependent nonequilibrium green functions. Phys. Rev. B 99, 69 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.134409 (2019).

  102. Mondal, R. et al. Inertial effects in ultrafast spin dynamics. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 579, 170830 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Thiele, A. A. Steady-state motion of magnetic domains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 230–233 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Kuchkin, V. M. & Kiselev, N. S. Homotopy transitions and 3D magnetic solitons. APL Mater. 10, 071102 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0097559 (2022).

  105. Liu, Y., Hou, W., Han, X. & Zang, J. Three-dimensional dynamics of a magnetic hopfion driven by spin transfer torque. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 127204 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.127204 (2020).

  106. Kuchkin, V. M. et al. Stability and nucleation of dipole strings in uniaxial chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. B 111, 174410 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.174410 (2025).

  107. Vansteenkiste, A. et al. The design and verification of mumax3. AIP Adv. 4, 4899186 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4899186 (2014).

  108. Kuchkin, V. M. Regularized LLG simulations MuMax3 (extension). https://github.com/kuchkin/mumax3-gneb (2022).

  109. Rybakov, F. N., Borisov, A. B., Blügel, S. & Kiselev, N. S. New type of stable particlelike states in chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 117201 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.117201 (2015).

  110. Fert, A. & Piraux, L. Magnetic nanowires. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 338–358 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Biziere, N. et al. Imaging the fine structure of a magnetic domain wall in a ni nanocylinder. Nano Lett. 13, 2053–2057 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Schöbitz, M. et al. Fast domain wall motion governed by topology and Ersted fields in cylindrical magnetic nanowires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 217201 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.217201 (2019).

  113. Ruiz-Gómez, S. et al. Tailoring the energy landscape of a bloch point domain wall with curvature. Nat Commun 16, 7422 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62705-x (2025).

  114. Hertel, R. & Kirschner, J. Magnetic drops in a soft-magnetic cylinder. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 278, L291–L297 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Thiaville, A. & Nakatani, Y.Domain-Wall Dynamics in Nanowiresand Nanostrips, 161–205 (Springer, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/10938171_5.

  116. Hertel, R. Ultrafast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes and nanowires. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 483002 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Charilaou, M., Braun, H.-B. & Löffler, J. F. Monopole-induced emergent electric fields in ferromagnetic nanowires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 097202 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ma, X.-P., Zheng, J., Piao, H.-G., Kim, D.-H. & Fischer, P. Cherenkov-type three-dimensional breakdown behavior of the bloch-point domain wall motion in the cylindrical nanowire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 013002 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0013002 (2020).

  119. Charilaou, M. Bloch point dynamics in exchange-spring heterostructures. APL Mater. 10, 097610 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0097610 (2022).

  120. Moreno, R., Carvalho-Santos, V., Altbir, D. & Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. Detailed examination of domain wall types, their widths and critical diameters in cylindrical magnetic nanowires. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 542, 168495 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Fernandez-Roldan, J. A. & Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. Dynamics of chiral domain walls under applied current in cylindrical magnetic nanowires. APL Mater. 10, 103408 (2022).

  122. Askey, J., Hunt, M., Langbein, W. & Ladak, S. Asymmetric dual bloch point domain walls in cylindrical magnetic nanowires. APL Mater. 10, 071105 (2022).

  123. Fernandez-Roldan, J. A., P. del Real, R., Bran, C., Vazquez, M. & Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. Electric current and field control of vortex structures in cylindrical magnetic nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 102, 024421 (2020).

  124. Tejo, F., Fernandez-Roldan, J. A., Guslienko, K. Y., Otxoa, R. M. & Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. Giant supermagnonic bloch point velocities in cylindrical ferromagnetic nanowires. Nanoscale 16, 10737–10744 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Bittencourt, G. H. R., Carvalho-Santos, V. L., Chubykalo-Fesenko, O., Altbir, D. & Moreno, R. Dynamics of chiral domain walls in bent cylindrical magnetic nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 135, 188985 (2024).

  126. Saugar, E., Moreno, R., Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. & Guslienko, K. Topology-driven complex magnetization dynamics of the bloch-point domain wall in cylindrical geometry. Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 064028 (2025).

  127. Kuchkin, V. M. et al. Magnetic skyrmions, chiral kinks, and holomorphic functions. Phys. Rev. B 102, 144422 (2020).

  128. Grundy, P., Hothersall, D., Jones, G., Middleton, B. & Tebble, R. The formation and structure of cylindrical magnetic domains in thin cobalt crystals. Phys. Status Solidi 9, 79–88 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Han, M.-G. et al. Topological magnetic-spin textures in two-dimensional van der waals cr2ge2te6. Nano Lett. 19, 7859–7865 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Szilva, A. et al. Quantitative theory of magnetic interactions in solids. Reviews of Modern Phys. 95, 035004 (2023).

  131. Haller, A., Groenendijk, S., Habibi, A., Michels, A. & Schmidt, T. L. Quantum skyrmion lattices in heisenberg ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043113 (2022).

  132. Rózsa, L., Wuhrer, D., Díaz, S. A., Nowak, U. & Belzig, W. Hidden quantum correlations in the ground states of quasiclassical spin systems. Phys. Rev. B 111, 174441 (2025).

  133. Millard, K. & Leff, H. S. Infinite-spin limit of the quantum heisenberg model. J. Math. Phys. 12, 1000–1005 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Hertel, R. & Andreas, C.Multiscale simulation of Bloch point dynamics in thick nanowires, 653–677 (Elsevier, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100164-6.00022-9.

  135. Andreas, C.Multiscale Multimodel Simulation of Micromagnetic Singularities, vol. 88 of Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe Schlüsseltechnologien / Key Technologies (Forschungszentrum Jülich, 2014).Dissertation, Universität Duisburg-Essen/Université de Strasbourg.

  136. Skyrme, T. H. R. A nonlinear field theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 260, 127–138 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  137. Landau, L. D. On the theory of phase transitions. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 19–32 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Schieback, C., Hinzke, D., Kläui, M., Nowak, U. & Nielaba, P. Temperature dependence of the current-induced domain wall motion from a modified landau-lifshitz-bloch equation. Phys. Rev. B 80, 214403 (2009).

  139. Kuchkin, V. M. et al. Geometry and symmetry in skyrmion dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 104, 165116 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.165116 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.S.K. and V.M.K. acknowledge F. N. Rybakov for fruitful discussions and critical comments. V.M.K., A.H., T.L.S., and A.M. acknowledge financial support from the National Research Fund of Luxembourg (AFR/23/17951349 and C22/MS/17415246/DeQuSky). V.M.K. acknowledges financial support from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101203692 (QUANTHOPF). N.S.K. acknowledges support from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (Grant No. 856538—project “3D MAGiC”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Vladyslav M. Kuchkin, Andreas Haller, Andreas Michels & Thomas L. Schmidt

  2. Peter Grünberg Institute, Forschungszentrum Jülich and JARA, Jülich, Germany

    Nikolai S. Kiselev

Authors
  1. Vladyslav M. Kuchkin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Haller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Michels
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas L. Schmidt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nikolai S. Kiselev
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

V.M.K. and N.S.K. conceived the project. V.M.K. developed the theoretical model and performed numerical simulations. V.M.K., A.H., A.M., T.L.S., and N.S.K. discussed the results and contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladyslav M. Kuchkin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

- Communications Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplemental material (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuchkin, V.M., Haller, A., Michels, A. et al. Regularized micromagnetic theory for Bloch points. Commun Phys (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02565-z

Download citation

  • Received: 29 July 2025

  • Accepted: 17 February 2026

  • Published: 11 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02565-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Referees
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Physics (Commun Phys)

ISSN 2399-3650 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing