Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Physics
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications physics
  3. articles
  4. article
Dismantling complex networks based on higher-order graph neural network
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 March 2026

Dismantling complex networks based on higher-order graph neural network

  • Wennan Zhou  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0007-1936-63191 na1,
  • Suoyi Tan1 na1,
  • Yang Fang1,
  • Xin Lü  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-64931 na2 &
  • …
  • Xiang Zhao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-02191 na2 

Communications Physics , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1299 Accesses

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational science
  • Information theory and computation

Abstract

Although existing research has confirmed the importance of higher-order structures in identifying key nodes within networks, the challenge remains on how to effectively integrate different types of higher-order information to precisely locate nodes that may be inconspicuous in lower-order structures but play a crucial role in higher-order interactions. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a general Higher-order Graph Neural Network representation learning framework (HoGNN) that can flexibly adapt to various types of higher-order relationships. Based on a robust theoretical framework, we develop a network dismantling model, SPR(Structural and Processual Role-aware Network Dismantling), which integrates multi-dimensional higher-order relations from both macro and micro perspectives. Empirical analysis demonstrated that the proposed model exhibits superior dismantling efficiency on both real-world and synthetic networks, using the minimal number of target node removals to collapse the network. Moreover, we show that SPR is more resilient to interference and accurately identifies key nodes in networks with multi-dimensional complex structures.

Similar content being viewed by others

Study on the robust control of higher-order networks

Article Open access 27 February 2025

Unifying topological structure and self-attention mechanism for node classification in directed networks

Article Open access 04 January 2025

Nonparametric inference of higher order interaction patterns in networks

Article Open access 31 July 2024

Data availability

All datasets supporting the findings of this study are available at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/zhouwn/spr.

Code availability

The custom code that supports the findings of this study is available at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/zhouwn/spr.

References

  1. Mazzolini, A., Gherardi, M., Caselle, M., Cosentino Lagomarsino, M. & Osella, M. Statistics of shared components in complex component systems. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021023 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zachary, W. W. An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. J. Anthropol. Res. 33, 452–473 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grilli, J., Barabás, G., Michalska-Smith, M. J. & Allesina, S. Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nature 548, 210–213 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agrawal, S., Galmarini, S. & Kröger, M. Energy formulation for infinite structures: Order parameter for percolation, critical bonds, and power-law scaling of contact-based transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 196101 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krause, S. M., Danziger, M. M. & Zlatić, V. Hidden connectivity in networks with vulnerable classes of nodes. Phys. Rev. X 6, 041022 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grassia, M., De Domenico, M. & Mangioni, G. Machine learning dismantling and early-warning signals of disintegration in complex systems. Nat. Commun. 12, 5190 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Osat, S., Papadopoulos, F., Teixeira, A. S. & Radicchi, F. Embedding-aided network dismantling. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013076 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, R., Erez, K., Ben-Avraham, D. & Havlin, S. Breakdown of the internet under intentional attack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3682 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Musciotto, F. & Miccichè, S. Effective strategies for targeted attacks to the network of Cosa Nostra affiliates. EPJ Data Sci. 11, 11 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morone, F., Min, B., Bo, L., Mari, R. & Makse, H. A. Collective influence algorithm to find influencers via optimal percolation in massively large social media. Sci. Rep. 6, 30062 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabási, A.-L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. nature 406, 378–382 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wandelt, S., Sun, X., Feng, D., Zanin, M. & Havlin, S. A comparative analysis of approaches to network-dismantling. Sci. Rep. 8, 13513 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bonacich, P. Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62, 1170–1182 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman, L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 40, 35–41 (1977).

  15. Newman, M. Networks (Oxford University Press, 2018).

  16. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T. et al. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web (1999).

  17. Braunstein, A., Dall’Asta, L., Semerjian, G. & Zdeborová, L. Network dismantling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 12368–12373 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mugisha, S. & Zhou, H.-J. Identifying optimal targets of network attack by belief propagation. Phys. Rev. E. 94, 012305 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zdeborová, L., Zhang, P. & Zhou, H.-J. Fast and simple decycling and dismantling of networks. Sci. Rep. 6, 37954 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tan, S.-Y., Wu, J., Lü, L., Li, M.-J. & Lu, X. Efficient network disintegration under incomplete information: the comic effect of link prediction. Sci. Rep. 6, 22916 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fan, C., Zeng, L., Sun, Y. & Liu, Y.-Y. Finding key players in complex networks through deep reinforcement learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 317–324 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, J. & Wang, B. Dismantling complex networks by a neural model trained from tiny networks. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2559–2568 (2022).

  23. Zhang, J. & Wang, B. Encoding node diffusion competence and role significance for network dismantling. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, 111–121 (2023).

  24. Artime, O. et al. Robustness and resilience of complex networks. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 114–131 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zügner, D., Akbarnejad, A. & Günnemann, S. Adversarial attacks on neural networks for graph data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2847–2856 (2018).

  26. Zeng, Y., Huang, Y., Ren, X.-L. & Lü, L. Identifying vital nodes through augmented random walks on higher-order networks. Inf. Sci. 679, 121067 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Benson, A. R., Gleich, D. F. & Leskovec, J. Higher-order organization of complex networks. Science 353, 163–166 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Torres, L., Blevins, A. S., Bassett, D. & Eliassi-Rad, T. The why, how, and when of representations for complex systems. SIAM Rev. 63, 435–485 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Papillon, M., Sanborn, S., Hajij, M. & Miolane, N. Architectures of topological deep learning: A survey of message-passing topological neural networks. preprint at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10031 (2023).

  30. Ebli, S., Defferrard, M. & Spreemann, G. Simplicial neural networks. In NeurIPS Workshop on Topological Data Analysis and Beyond, 1–7 (2020).

  31. Yang, M., Isufi, E. & Leus, G. Simplicial convolutional neural networks. In ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 8847–8851 (IEEE, 2022).

  32. Bodnar, C. et al. Weisfeiler and Lehman go topological: Message passing simplicial networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 1026–1037 (PMLR, 2021).

  33. Chen, Y., Gel, Y. R. & Poor, H. V. Bscnets: Block simplicial complex neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, 6333–6341 (2022).

  34. Hacker, C. k-simplex2vec: a simplicial extension of node2vec. In 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1–8 (2020).

  35. Feng, Y., You, H., Zhang, Z., Ji, R. & Gao, Y. Hypergraph neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference On Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, 3558–3565 (2019).

  36. Jiang, J., Wei, Y., Feng, Y., Cao, J. & Gao, Y. Dynamic hypergraph neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 28, 2635–2641 (2019).

  37. Yadati, N. et al. Hypergcn: A new method for training graph convolutional networks on hypergraphs. Advances in Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 32 (2019).

  38. Huang, J. & Yang, J. Unignn: a unified framework for graph and hypergraph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 563–2569 (2021).

  39. Bai, S., Zhang, F. & Torr, P. H. Hypergraph convolution and hypergraph attention. Pattern Recognit. 110, 107637 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wu, H., Yan, Y. & Ng, M. K.-P. Hypergraph collaborative network on vertices and hyperedges. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45, 3245–3258 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Roddenberry, T. M., Glaze, N. & Segarra, S. Principled simplicial neural networks for trajectory prediction. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 9020–9029 (PMLR, 2021).

  42. Henderson, K. et al. Rolx: structural role extraction & mining in large graphs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1231–1239 (2012).

  43. Henderson, K. et al. It’s who you know: graph mining using recursive structural features. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 663–671 (2011).

  44. Gu, W., Yang, C., Li, L., Hou, J. & Radicchi, F. Deep-learning-aided dismantling of interdependent networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 1–12 (2025).

  45. Guo, G., Zhang, J. & Yorke-Smith, N. A novel evidence-based bayesian similarity measure for recommender systems. ACM Trans. Web (TWEB) 10, 1–30 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Guimera, R., Danon, L., Diaz-Guilera, A., Giralt, F. & Arenas, A. Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions. Phys. Rev. E. 68, 065103 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kunegis, J. Konect: the Koblenz network collection. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 1343–1350 (2013).

  48. Bu, D. et al. Topological structure analysis of the protein–protein interaction network in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 2443–2450 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ewing, R. M. et al. Large-scale mapping of human protein–protein interactions by mass spectrometry. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 89 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hagberg, A., Swart, P. J. & Schult, D. A. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. Tech. Rep. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) (2008).

  51. Bonacich, P. Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am. J. Sociol. 92, 1170–1182 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Boldi, P. & Vigna, S. Axioms for centrality. Internet Math. 10, 222–262 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Engsig, M., Tejedor, A., Moreno, Y., Foufoula-Georgiou, E. & Kasmi, C. Domirank centrality reveals structural fragility of complex networks via node dominance. Nat. Commun. 15, 56 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Huang, Y., Wang, H., Ren, X.-L. & Lü, L. Identifying key players in complex networks via network entanglement. Commun. Phys. 7, 19 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ren, X.-L., Gleinig, N., Helbing, D. & Antulov-Fantulin, N. Generalized network dismantling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 6554–6559 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R. & Skiena, S. Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 701–710 (2014).

  57. Grover, A. & Leskovec, J. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 855–864 (2016).

  58. Ahmed, N. K. et al. Role-based graph embeddings. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 34, 2401–2415 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kipf, T. N. & Welling, M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, 5, 1–14 (2016).

  60. Velickovic, P. et al. Graph attention networks. stat 1050, 10–48550 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu, Q. & Wang, B. Neural extraction of multiscale essential structure for network dismantling. Neural Netw. 154, 99–108 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFB3102600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (U25B2047, 62272469, 72474223, 62306322, 72025405, 72421002, 92467302, 72301285), Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2023RC1007, 2024RC3133, 2023JJ40685), the Innovation Research Foundation of National University of Defense Technology (JS24-04), the National Science and Technology Major Project for Brain Science and Brain-like Intelligence Technology (2025ZD0215700), the Major Program of Xiangjiang Laboratory (24XJJCYJ01001) and the Postgraduate Innovation Program of National University of Defense Technology (XJQY2024064). The authors thank Stefano Boccaletti for useful discussions.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Wennan Zhou, Suoyi Tan.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Xin Lü, and Xiang Zhao.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China

    Wennan Zhou, Suoyi Tan, Yang Fang, Xin Lü & Xiang Zhao

Authors
  1. Wennan Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suoyi Tan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yang Fang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xin Lü
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiang Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Idea and Supervise: Wennan Zhou, Suoyi Tan, Yang Fang, and Xiang Zhao. Data Analysis: Wennan Zhou, Suoyi Tan, Yang Fang, and Xiang Zhao. Writing Original Draft: Wennan Zhou, Suoyi Tan, and Yang Fang. Writing Discussions & Editing: Wennan Zhou, Suoyi Tan, Yang Fang, Xin Lü, Xiang Zhao.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Lü or Xiang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Physics thanks Yang Liu and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, W., Tan, S., Fang, Y. et al. Dismantling complex networks based on higher-order graph neural network. Commun Phys (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02601-y

Download citation

  • Received: 26 February 2025

  • Accepted: 13 March 2026

  • Published: 27 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02601-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Referees
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Physics (Commun Phys)

ISSN 2399-3650 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics