Fig. 5: Thickness dependence of B0 and B1. | Communications Materials

Fig. 5: Thickness dependence of B0 and B1.

From: Scalable Sondheimer oscillations driven by commensurability between two quantizations

Fig. 5: Thickness dependence of B0 and B1.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a B0 is inversely proportional to the thickness. b In all samples, B0 is about 3 times ΔB. c B1 in different samples. It decreases with increasing d. The data for d = 1.02 mm is taken from Ref. 8. The error bar originates from the uncertainty in the extraction of the threshold field, B130. d The ratio of B1/ΔB is close to 10 in all samples. e) A comparison of g(x) = x−4 and f(x) = exp( − x/3) ⋅ x−2.5. The two functions cross each other at x⋆ ≃ 10.5.

Back to article page