Table 1 Average abundance and average weight concentration of microplastics in surface and subsurface samples in the Eurasian Arctic different seas and different water masses in comparison to available previous research surveys in the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans.

From: Microplastics distribution in the Eurasian Arctic is affected by Atlantic waters and Siberian rivers

 

Surface samples

Subsurface samples

 

N of samples

Mean abundance items/m3 (items/km2)

Mean particle surface area (mm2)

Mean weight concentration μg/m3

N of samples

Mean abundance itemsa/m3 (fragm/fibre)

Mean particle surface area (mm2)

Mean weight concentration μga/m3

Present study

 Total

48

0.004 (800)

3.2

3.7

60

0.8 (0.3/0.5)

0.04

1.3

 For each Sea

  Barents Sea

7

0.005 (1000)

6.1

12.5

6

0.8 (0.4/0.4)

0.21

6.6

  Kara Sea

15

0.003 (700)

3.5

3.8

16

1.0 (0.7/0.3)

0.04

1.1

  Laptev Sea

20

0.002 (400)

1.2

0.5

20

0.7 (0.2/0.5)

0.03

0.5

  East-Siberian Sea

6

0.010 (2000)

2.2

3.9

18

0.8 (0.2/0.6)

0.02

0.4

 For each water mass

  Inner plume

6

0.0045 (900)

1.3

1.6

3

0.8 (0/0.8)

0.02

0.3

  Outer plume

21

0.0051 (1000)

2.2

2.9

29

0.6 (0.2/0.4)

0.03

0.4

  Polar surface water

10

0

 

0

16

0.9 (0.5/0.4)

0.04

1.1

  Atlantic surface water

11

0.0045 (900)

6.1

9.8

12

1.0 (0.6/0.4)

0.08

3.8

Other studies

 Barents Sea

21 (Ref. 10), 17 (Ref. 12)

0.34 (Ref. 10) (28,000(Ref. 10); 63,000(Ref. 12))

  

75 (Ref. 10)

2.68 (Ref. 10)

  

 North Atlantic

- (Ref. 65), >6100 (Ref. 66)

0.01–0.04 (Ref. 65) (20,328) (Ref. 66)b

  

470 (Ref. 64)

2.46 (Ref. 64)

  

 Arctic Oceanc

21 (Ref. 12)

(0; 0–27,000) (Ref. 12)b

  

7 (Ref. 15)

2.4 (Ref. 15)

  

 Arctic Central Basin

    

57 (Ref. 16)

0.7 (Ref. 16)

  

 Western Atlantic

>6100 (Ref. 66)

(1500) (Ref. 66)

      

 Equatorial Atlantic

88 (Ref. 67)

0.01 (Ref. 67)

      
  1. atotal abundance of plastic particles (sum of fragments and fibres).
  2. b>0.5 mm and macroplastic.
  3. cwithout Barents Sea.