Fig. 2: Iron isotope composition (δ56Fe) versus MgO/FeOT for different lithologies from ocean lithosphere. | Communications Earth & Environment

Fig. 2: Iron isotope composition (δ56Fe) versus MgO/FeOT for different lithologies from ocean lithosphere.

From: Fractional crystallization causes the iron isotope contrast between mid-ocean ridge basalts and abyssal peridotites

Fig. 2: Iron isotope composition (δ56Fe) versus MgO/FeOT for different lithologies from ocean lithosphere.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a Global MORB1,7,9 (orange circles). b Gabbro (green squares) and felsic vein (red circle) samples, as well as mineral, separate from Hole 735B of this study. c Global AP2 (blue squares). MORB are considered to have uniform Fe isotope composition (δ56Fe = +0.050 to +0.176‰) with a mean of +0.105 ± 0.006‰1 (orange dashed line). AP, as MORB mantle melting residues, have lighter iron isotope composition (δ56Fe = −0.094 to +0.108‰) with a mean of +0.010 ± 0.014‰2 (blue dashed line). The bulk rock gabbro and felsic vein samples have Fe isotope compositions varying as low as those of AP and as high as and even higher than those of MORB. The modeled compositions (purple squares) of melt (Supplementary Data 4) in equilibrium with gabbroic samples and olivine, pyroxene therein are plotted a for comparison (see “Methods” section for model details). The mineral separates such as olivine (Ol, purple diamonds), clinopyroxene (Cpx, yellow diamonds), amphibole (Am, brown diamonds), and Fe–Ti oxides (black diamonds) also show a similar negative correlation between δ56Fe and MgO/FeOT (b). The best-fit lines at 95% confidence intervals with R2 values are given for the calculated melt (a) and bulk rock samples (b). Error bars are ±1 SD.

Back to article page