Table 1 Nitrogen budget for wildfire aerosol fueled Eastern Eurasian Basin phytoplankton bloom.

From: Wildfire aerosol deposition likely amplified a summertime Arctic phytoplankton bloom

Eastern Eurasian Basin phytoplankton bloom 2014

Accumulated chlorophyll a (mg m−3)

0.7 ± 0.3a

MLD (m)

10.0 ± 5b

Integrated chlorophyll a (mg m−2)

7.0 ± 4.6

Chlorophyll a: N (mg: mmol N)

2.0 ± 2c

N requirement (mmol N m−2)

3.5 ± 6.4

Total N deposition July 1Aug 31, 2014 (mmol N m−2)

Standard Model

0.2 ± 0.4

Inclusion of peat biomass

0.7 ± 1.4d

Base deposition estimate

(Inclusion of peat fires ×2)

1.4 ± 2.8e

High deposition estimate

(Inclusion of peat fires ×5)

3.5 ± 70.0e

N requirement met by wildfire aerosol deposition (%)

Standard Model

5.7 ± 15.5

Inclusion of peat biomass

20.0 ± 54.3

Base deposition estimate

(Inclusion of peat fires ×2)

39.9 ± 108.6

High deposition estimate

(Inclusion of peat fires ×5)

99.8 ± 271.5

  1. Note: adetermined as difference between the average chlorophyll a concentration during the period of peak bloom (indicated in Fig. 1a shaded region) and the pre-bloom period before 7/16/2014, bdefined based on NABOS expeditions in the Laptev Sea (see Fig. S2), cestimated using in situ data collected during ICESCAPE 201069 and 201169 as well as results from ref. 70 and ref. 71, dinclusion of the specificities of peat biomass, i.e., N and PM2.5 concentrations are up to ~3.5 times higher than emissions from boreal8 and tropical67 forest fires, e2 to 5-fold uncertainty exists in modeled deposition estimates31 (e.g., Figs. 2 and S7).