Table 2 Summary of the baseline estimates for parameters describing threats to Southern Resident killer whales, and the ranges considered in sensitivity testing

From: Warning sign of an accelerating decline in critically endangered killer whales (Orcinus orca)

Input parameter

Baseline (current)

Range tested

Prey impacts

Low

High

Prey abundance (index relative to long-term mean)

1.0

0.5

1.5

Modeling demographic consequences of anthropogenic threats

 

Climate change: percent decline in Chinook abundance over 40 years

No climate change impacts on prey

No decline in prey

90% decline over 40 years

Changes in Chinook size years to 8% decline

No decline

20 y

60 y

Noise (percent of feeding time with disturbance)

85%

0%

100%

Contaminants

Accumulation rate

2 ppm/y

0 ppm/y

4 ppm/y

Impact on calf survival (logistic slope)

−0.02

−0.01

−0.03

Half-life of PCBs in environment

No decline

25 y

75 y

Total equivalents of PCBs plus other contaminants

1.0

1.0

2.0

Other threats

Direct human-caused mortality (potentially preventable)

28.3% of deaths (included within annual mortality)

No reduction

All 28.3% of natural mortality prevented each year

Inbreeding impact (lethal equivalents/diploid)

6.29 LE

0 LE

12 LE

Variance in male breeding success (sampled from beta distribution with mean=0.4)

SD = 0.4

SD = 0.3

SD = 0.5

Fishery reductions, closures, or relocations

No increase in percentage of Chinook available to SRKW

3% increase

25% increase amplified by another 40% improvement in size over 50 years

Oil spill

None

Small: 1.08% frequency; 12.5% mortality Large: 0.21% frequency; 52% mortality

Small: 2.16% frequency Large: 0.42% frequency

  1. Note that parameter ranges drawn from the literature are noted as such in the text; otherwise, ranges were provided by coauthors with subject-matter expertise as a first-order approximation of plausible values.