Table 2 Monthly averaged emission and uncertainty range of EICO and MEIC/EDGAR at different areas of Cases I, II, and III
From: Space-based inversion reveals underestimated carbon monoxide emissions over Shanxi
Time | Emissions over different areas | Case I (≥9 µg m-2 s-1) | Case II (6 ~ 9 µg m-2 s-1) | Case III (<6 µg m-2 s-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019–2020 | Spatial sampling of cases according to MEIC | MEIC | 17.4 | 6.9 | 0.8 |
EICO | 7.3 ± 3.6 | 7.6 ± 3.7 | 6.6 ± 3.3 | ||
Spatial sampling of cases according to EDGAR | EDGAR | 36.5 | 7.5 | 0.4 | |
EICO | 9.0 ± 4.3 | 8.4 ± 4.0 | 6.5 ± 3.3 | ||
Spatial sampling of cases according to EICO | EICO | 10.0 ± 4.7 | 6.9 ± 3.4 | 5.5 ± 2.8 | |
January & December in 2019 and 2020 | Spatial sampling of cases according to MEIC | MEIC | 12.5 | 7.0 | 1.1 |
EICO | 11.3 ± 5.0 | 11.7 ± 5.3 | 10.3 ± 4.6 | ||
Spatial sampling of cases according to EDGAR | EDGAR | 33.4 | 7.6 | 0.5 | |
EICO | 14.7 ± 6.4 | 14.2 ± 6.2 | 10.2 ± 4.6 | ||
Spatial sampling of cases according to EICO | EICO | 12.2 ± 5.4 | 7.7 ± 3.8 | 5.2 ± 3.5 | |
