Fig. 2: Performance comparison of process-based (E-HYPE) and hybrid models (E-HYPE integrated with GLM, QM, RF and LSTM) in predicting streamflow total volume (SMAE), high extremes (NSE) and low extremes (logNSE). | Communications Earth & Environment

Fig. 2: Performance comparison of process-based (E-HYPE) and hybrid models (E-HYPE integrated with GLM, QM, RF and LSTM) in predicting streamflow total volume (SMAE), high extremes (NSE) and low extremes (logNSE).

From: Hybrid approaches enhance hydrological model usability for local streamflow prediction

Fig. 2

The cumulative distribution of model performance is shown using the SMAE (a), NSE (b), and logNSE (c) metrics (see Methods). Perfect performance corresponds to 0 for SMAE and 1 for NSE and logNSE. The grey line represents E-HYPE, while colored lines with varying styles denote hybrid models with different post-processing methods. Performance improves as the lines approach the perfect value marker on the x-axis. The x-axis represents the metric values, and the y-axis indicates the proportion of stations with performance not exceeding the corresponding metric level. The inset plot provides a zoomed-in view of the most common range (highlighted on the x-axis) for clarity.

Back to article page