Fig. 3: Infrasound signals and arrivals at balloons following the Mw 7.3 Flores earthquake, compared to arrivals predicted from the inverted models. | Communications Earth & Environment

Fig. 3: Infrasound signals and arrivals at balloons following the Mw 7.3 Flores earthquake, compared to arrivals predicted from the inverted models.

From: Balloon seismology enables subsurface inversion without ground stations

Fig. 3: Infrasound signals and arrivals at balloons following the Mw 7.3 Flores earthquake, compared to arrivals predicted from the inverted models.The alt text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a Picked Rayleigh wave group velocities, derived from picked arrival times assuming the true location and time of the Mw 7.3 Flores earthquake, shown in blue. These measurements are compared to 400 group velocity curves constructed from a random selection of posterior models. The MAP model is shown in green. b Pressure waveforms used to pick arrivals, bandpass-filtered between 0.06 and 0.2 Hz, with picked times shown in blue and arrival times predicted from the MAP in green. c Zoom on TTL4-15 signal, showing the posterior distribution of arrival times for P and S waves compared to the picked value and its uncertainty in blue.

Back to article page